<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; tommy-sheppard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/tag/tommy-sheppard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who Scotland? (part two)</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/29/who-scotland-part-two/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/29/who-scotland-part-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 14:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tommy-sheppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youscotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/29/who-scotland-part-two/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would normally reserve a link like this to the linklog, but this one gives me the chance to say, &#8220;Told you so, neeeh!&#8221; Richard Thomson says: You Scotland &#8212; RIP? A couple of weeks ago, a video appeared on YouTube featuring Tommy Sheppard, former Labour apparatchik and owner of &#8216;The Stand&#8217; comedy clubs. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would normally reserve a link like this to the linklog, but this one gives me the chance to say, &#8220;Told you so, neeeh!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.richardthomson.com/2007/09/you-scotland-rip.html">Richard Thomson says: You Scotland &#8212; RIP?</a></p>
<blockquote><p>A couple of weeks ago, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jACI1F6H_fY">a video appeared on YouTube featuring Tommy Sheppard</a>, former Labour apparatchik and owner of &#8216;The Stand&#8217; comedy clubs. The film was a request for feedback from the founding fathers of a website called &#8216;<a href="http://youscotland.com/">YouScotland.com</a>&#8216;, asking whether or not they should continue with their venture.</p>
<p>That their video has at the time of writing had only 257 hits and attracted precisely zero viewer comments, is probably all the feedback they need.</p></blockquote>
<p>Back when YouScotland launched, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/02/27/who-scotland/">I wrote a rather critical post</a>. It looked as though I was wrong when their viral, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuvLVXXKt6I">The Best Wee Numpty in the World</a>, proved to be immensely successful.</p>
<p>But since then, nothing again. I have to admit that before Richard Thomson&#8217;s post, I had completely forgotten about YouScotland. I suppose it is natural that YouScotland was going to quieten down a bit once the election was over. But these are the people who thought they could kick-start a second enlightenment. One funny video then disappearing without a trace isn&#8217;t enough to achieve that sort of thing.</p>
<p>Looking at site&#8217;s failings, I think Richard Thomson hits the nail on the head. And I can&#8217;t help feeling that I was right when I wrote my first post about YouScotland in February. The virals made me have a re-think, but it looks like my initial gut instincts turned out to be right.</p>
<p>Funniest of all about YouScotland was the fact that they tried their best to sound like a state-of-the-art Web 2.0 campaigning machine. But the middle-aged clique who ran it fundamentally misunderstood what Web 2.0 is all about. I&#8217;m afraid it was a real disco Dad moment.</p>
<p>Even more embarrassingly, they seemed to misunderstand how grass-roots movements form. Hint: grass-roots movements tend to form from the bottom-up, not at the say-so of a clique.</p>
<p>And now that the SNP are in charge, they can&#8217;t really point at Scottish Labour and complain about the establishment any more. Change happened. They can&#8217;t use the same old anti-establishment rhetoric, because a pro-independence party <em>is</em> the establishment now!</p>
<p>They were also not helped by the fact that they didn&#8217;t seem to be very different to a lot of pro-independence organisations, or the established pro-change movement as a whole. Why be bombarded with requests for donations at YouScotland when it didn&#8217;t offer anything different?</p>
<p>Ah yes, those requests for donations. In <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jACI1F6H_fY">Tommy Sheppard&#8217;s latest video</a>, he says that the only way YouScotland could continue is if all of its users donated &#8220;a minimum of ten pounds&#8221;. <em>Ten pounds!! What?!</em></p>
<p>I mean, really, how expensive is it to make a website like YouScotland (which was shoddy anyway)? There are any number of political movements who do not go around cap in hand &#8212; and they certainly do not ask for a <em>minimum</em> of £10.</p>
<p>As I said in my original post about YouScotland, it costs nothing to set up a blog. While I accept that you could not expect a website like YouScotland to be made for nothing, you have to ask what they were intending to spend the money on?</p>
<p>I mean, say that YouScotland managed to get 1,000 members (in some ways, quite modest for a revolutionary, rip-roaring grass-roots movement). If each member donates a tenner per year, YouScotland would have £10,000 to spend every single year. I mean, what on earth was that website going to have on it for it to cost that much to make?!</p>
<p><a href="http://youscotland.com/">Try to visit YouScotland today</a> and the website will not load. If I had donated some money in the run-up to the election, I reckon I would feel pretty short-changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/29/who-scotland-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

