Archive: stephen-fry

This is an accompanying article to my contribution on this week’s episode of The Pod Delusion. You can listen below.

This week, Freeview has had one of its occasional retuning events. As new channels come and old channels go, the channel list becomes increasingly messy until the point where the powers-that-be decide enough is enough and it’s time to bring some organisation to it.

This sort of thing is a necessary evil of the digital era. But I feel sorry for those, particularly older, people who are used to setting up their television once when they buy it, then making do with two and a half channels for the rest of their lives.

A couple of weeks ago in the first episode of The Pod Delusion, James O’Malley spoke about the bonkers-sounding Conspiracy Channel. Sadly, I do not have Sky, so have been unable to sample its delights for myself. I must rely on humble Freeview for my post analogue switch-off telly fix.

Freeview brings a wealth of choice that simply did not exist on analogue terrestrial television. That is of course a good thing, and I personally cannot imagine going back to making do with the five analogue channels. But there is an element of truth to that Fry & Laurie sketch, where a dining Government minister is dumped on by the waiter with a “choice” of cutlery which turns out to be countless plastic coffee stirrers.

At the same time as this week’s big retune, the long-awaited launch of Quest, the new channel from Discovery, has taken place. Its original launch had already been long delayed and finally aborted at the last minute several months ago.

While a channel that promises something resembling quality struggled to get off the ground, there has been no shortage of utter crud getting airtime on Freeview. In fact, I struggled to think of any half-decent channels that had launched recently. So I decided to look it up, and see what changes had been made to Freeview over the previous year.

  • 10 September — Smile TV 2 (a mucky Babestation-style channel; closed on 19 March)
  • January — Rocks & Co (shopping channel)
  • 8 January — SuperCasino (roulette channel)
  • 8 January — NetPlay TV (broadcasting shopping programmes or infomercials)
  • 15 January — CNN International — 4 hours per day
  • 22 January — Dave+1
  • 2 February — Russia Today — 2 hours per day
  • 3 February — DirectGov (text service)
  • 12 March — Partyland
  • 1 April — Gems TV — 5 hours per day
  • 5 April — CNN increases hours to 7 hours per day, 2 hours of which is SuperCasino
  • 1 May — Gems TV closed down
  • 13 May — Smile TV 2 relaunched — 5 hours per day
  • 14 May — Quest — 14 hours per day — launch aborted!
  • 20 May — Virgin 1 goes 24 hours per day
  • 20 May — Virgin 1+1 — 12 hours per day
  • 23 May — Film4 extends hours
  • 1 July — Create & Craft (shopping channel) launches — 5 hours per day
  • 4 July — Russia Today gets second slot — 2 hours per day
  • 15 July — Big Deal (quiz channel) launches — 7 hours per day
  • 27 August — Price-drop tv returns
  • 27 August — Smile TV 3
  • 27 August — Babestation
  • 30 September — Quest launched

So a couple of channels — Film4 and Virgin 1 — have extended their hours. A couple of news channels have been able to find scraps of space here and there. I say news channels, though in the case of Russia Today, propaganda may be a more accurate description. These channels broadcast at quite obscure hours. It is certainly an interesting spin on the concept of “24 hour news”.

Beyond that, the vast majority of new Freeview channels are pure trash. There are two new “+1″ channels, replaying exactly what was broadcast on a channel an hour ago. By my reckoning, there are now at least five such channels on Freeview, which doesn’t seem like the best use of limited bandwidth.

Beyond that, there is a collection of shopping channels, gambling channels, quiz channels and adult channels. Frankly, this is the sort of stuff you expect at the arse end of the darkest nooks of the Sky EPG. I am not quite sure this is what they had in mind when the digital revolution was promised.

The Babestation channels have long been a fixture on Sky. But their presence on Freeview is relatively novel. They are interesting for the fact that it hasn’t taken long for four of them to crop up. It is surprising because their appeal seems rather limited to me.

If you have never seen it (er, not that I’m an expert, of course), basically the format is quite simple. A few glamour models who couldn’t present their way out of a paper bag sit on a couch trying to encourage people to phone in for a mucky chit-chat.

Once someone with more money than sense takes the bait, the microphone is switched off, and some cheap-sounding music is turned up. The women proceeds to talk dirty on the phone — without the viewer being able to hear a word. They sort of wriggle around on the couch in a way that I assume is supposed to look sexy, but it really just makes them look vaguely like they need the toilet.

In short, it is the modern-day equivalent of the dodgy services advertised on business cards left in piss-stained telephone boxes, only with the beady eye of Ofcom overseeing proceedings. There is nothing extreme in the slightest about these channels. You wonder what goes through the mind of people who would sooner pay through the nose to sample such services when you could quite easily find more enticing free porn on the internet.

Up until this week’s retune, the positioning of one of these channels — Partyland — in the channel list was certainly interesting. It was channel number 50, but with no channels occupying numbers 51-69, the next channel up was CBBC. Even though the broadcasting hours do not clash, I can imagine plenty of children just pressing the down button on their remote and coming across a strange new channel promising a party land. It certainly would provide a more eye-popping rite of passage than accidentally stumbling across the frilly knickers section of the Argos catalogue.

It remains to be seen whether these channels remain a long-term fixture on the Freeview platform. One trashy genre which sadly appears to have stood the test of time is quiz channels. These late-night televisual travesties are hypnotically awful. A slightly desperate presenter will appear to engage you in a stare-out competition while goading you into answering questions with non-existent answers.

Even though they still live on, such quiz channels are not quite as prevalent as they used to be. They were a major victim of the collapse in trust that broadcasters faced a couple of years ago. Into the vacuum came the gambling channels.

It’s noted that this sort of programming tends to be on late at night, especially at the weekend. In other words, they are aimed squarely at the post-pub market.

The morals are pretty dubious. The clear idea is to target people whose judgement has been impaired by their alcoholic consumption, goading people into phoning premium rate phone lines when they perhaps shouldn’t. In the case of the gambling channels, it could be said that they intend to capture a particular section of the population that may have problems with addiction.

This is not quite the vision of digital television that was sold to the public. It is funny how most of the extra “choice” that has been brought into our living rooms revolves around extracting large amounts of cash from our wallets.

Some parts of the blogosphere are like a completely different world. The bits that are all geared around marketing and business are especially odd.

I will come back to that in a future post. In the meantime though, here is a post on a blog called Marketing Profs Daily Fix (via Weblog Tools Collection).

Why Blog Post Frequency Does Not Matter Anymore

“Thou shall post every day” is the most fundamental and most well known principle of blogging….

Every new blogger is warned about “the” ultimate rule and is confronted with the pressure of a day going by with no new post.

??? I don’t recall ever being warned about this. Maybe they just mean bloggers in marketing, but it says “every new blogger”.

Nevertheless, it does seem to be a widely held view. It is not uncommon to come across somebody who is under the impression that blogging is an incredibly time-consuming hobby. I have seen bloggers being asked, “do you ever get fed up with blogging every day?”, and “what if you can’t think of something to write about every day?”

But the only way blogging could be excessively time-consuming is if you wanted it to be. Sure, a really good, thorough post can take an hour or two to write. But you can only possibly blog in your spare time. If I didn’t blog then I would probably just spend that extra hour getting stupid in front of the television.

And who is to say that you have to blog every day? I certainly don’t. I try to blog as often as possible. But I think it is painfully obvious if you can’t think of anything to write about but still try to write it.

I am sure Stephen Fry once said that all newspaper columnists fill their space up by telling us that they can’t think of anything to write about. They all do this twice. The first one is expected at one point or another. The second one gets you sacked.

I assume that newspaper columnists usually have to write the same number of words week in, week out. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that every once in a while they have to write shit. But bloggers have no such excuse. This is, infact, one of the brilliant things about blogging — flexibility. You could write a post every hour if you wanted to, or you could just write once a month. Hell, there’s no need to be regular about it. Just post whenever you want to!

It is true that this approach means that bloggers can accidentally fall out of the habit. I have done once or twice, and I have to confess that I have come dangerously close to it recently (noticed the decreasing number of posts?). If you have spent a few months writing posts every day or so and all of a sudden you don’t write anything for a week people might begin to think that you have dropped off the face of the planet, and may therefore stop visiting.

In my experience, that is not the case. Semi-regular posting is probably a must, but that alone doesn’t bring visitors. And here I return to the Marketing Profs post, because it actually contains a number of very good points, even if I disagree that it was ever a “must” for bloggers to post every single day.

#1- Traffic is generated by participating in the community; not daily posting

That is a key in my view. This is why I am such an advocate of comments sections in blogs. It is the community element which is important. Conversation is the whole point of blogging. This blog had very few visitors until I started linking to other blogs and dropping in on the comments. That is a key way of discovering new blogs.

#3- Loyal readers coming back daily to check your posts is so Web 1.0 – …Loyal readers subscribe to your blog via RSS feeds and have new content pushed to them.

This is also true. I seldom browse blogs any more. I read them all via RSS feeds. Blogs without an RSS feed get forgotten about. In some cases I think this might have encouraged me to develop some bad habits. For instance — and I’m sure I’m not the only one who does this — I scan every single unread post, but I don’t read any of them. Perversely, the goal becomes getting the ‘unread’ count to zero rather than actually reading blogs. Slapped wrists all round.

But there is no doubt about it. Browsing blogs via the web is time consuming, particularly if you are constantly visiting sites which haven’t updated. RSS feeds make keeping track of your favourite websites much easier, and it saves a lot of time. (Any newcomers to RSS can find an explanation here. This site’s RSS feed is here.)

But this is the real biggie for me:

#6: Frequent posting drives poor content quality

I mentioned constipated newspaper columnists above, and noted that bloggers shouldn’t have the same problem. Simply, if you can’t think of anything to write about or even if you don’t feel up to writing it, then don’t write it! I am sure people can tell whenever I do this because the quality slides down the drain. So I try not to do that, even though I still sometimes feel obliged to write a wee post just to prove that I’m still alive!

So despite the initial sarcastic comments I made at the start, I salute the post. It contains some very sound advice that bloggers should bear in mind. It is, after all, the summer. Why should we all be trying to write posts regularly when we could be outside getting slightly less pale?