Archive: stats

I was all set to have a little bloggy party. “Another blogging milestone reached!” etc. There I was sitting pretty on the rankings of every blogger’s favourite website, Technorati.

doctorvee
98 blogs link here

That is the message that greeted me when I visited Technorati’s home page yesterday. Fans of round numbers will undoubtedly have noticed that 98 is tantalisingly close to 100 (which is technically less of a round number than it is two round digits and a straight digit).

Of course, we are talking about Technorati here, so I could probably get a more accurate idea of how many blogs are linking to this one by throwing darts. But still, I could say that 100 blogs link here according to Technorati, which is good enough for me.

So what did I see when I logged in to Technorati today?

97 blogs link here

This reminds me of the good old days of Ceefax. Page 360, motor sport news, was always one of my favourites. So I would call page 360 and keep my beady eye on that top line that scrolls through all of the page numbers. Almost there. 356, 357, 358, 359… WTF? 361?! I have to wait a whole while longer.

A question for you. Has this blog been slow to load for you over the past, say, couple of weeks? I had noticed it, but I just put it down to something loading slowly in the sidebar. These things happen from time to time and usually they get fixed eventually.

But I had also noticed big problems accessing my Sitemeter account. The results pages were extremely slow to load, and often they didn’t even load at all. I thought maybe they were just having some temporary issues. These things happen from time to time and usually they get fixed eventually.

On Saturday evening I was putting the finishing touches to Scottish Roundup. I was wondering what I should use for tracking stats. I had used Sitemeter on my blog for years, but I was tempted by StatCounter. I had used it before on an old, long-forgotten blog, and it does the job fairly well.

When I was browsing the StatCounter site, I spotted this little ‘news item’ in the top corner of the page: “StatCounter Says NO!” No to what? I was intrigued. I clicked through, and read the post.

A few months back, StatCounter was approached by an advertiser, offered lots of $$$, and asked to include a spyware cookie on all of our member sites…we refused on the spot.

We were shocked to discover just today that another well known stats provider is allowing up to 9 cookies to be installed in the browser of every visitor that hits one of their member websites. This means that the provider is making money by transmitting data on you and your visitors to a third party advertiser. Not only that, but to add insult to injury, the cookies are causing the member websites to load very slowly too.

Oh, a familiar story. The blog post written by StatCounter did not name the provider involved, but this was clearly what I had been experiencing recently. But I couldn’t find confirmation. Although I had an inkling that they were talking about Sitemeter, I couldn’t be certain.

I opted to give Sitemeter the benefit of the doubt. I was, after all, used to their service and it had never caused any major problems for me before. I decided to keep the Sitemeter code on my blog. But the commitment from StatCounter was encouraging, so I chose to use StatCounter for Scottish Roundup.

Today I have read this post on Troubled Diva. Well it pretty much seems as though Sitemeter has been using dodgy spyware cookies which not only invades your privacy but — to add insult to injury — also makes your web pages as slow as hell to load.

It’s funny. Sitemeter always had a funny whiff about it. The pages were ugly, and unlike most websites there didn’t seem to be much of a human voice about them. It did feel like it was being run by either robots or secretive people. That had changed when they introduced their blog, but posts on that have dried up. And the fact that they haven’t replied to any emails or made any statement about this news speaks volumes.

Mike at Troubled Diva says that the problem hasn’t affected Firefox, but I use Firefox 2.0 and I noticed the chronic slowdown. Needless to say, I removed Sitemeter from this blog immediately and I have replaced it with StatCounter.

It’s madness for Sitemeter to do this though. Users of the internet despise spyware and anybody who assists in this kind of behaviour is portrayed as the some kind of spamming e-Hitler. It’s especially bad news on the internet, where blogs and the like allow this kind of news to spread like wildfire. Sitemeter’s reputation will be irreparably tarnished, and they won’t be able to make much more dirty money again. Certainly not by using me anyway.

Continued from this post.

Look at what’s causing a spike of traffic to this blog…

Site referrers

And I haven’t even highlighted all of them. Crazy old internet, huh?

So there has been a lot of buzz about Google Analytics, a new fancy-pants stats thingy. Because of this buzz, though, there have been real teething troubles. They ought to have learned by now. It reminds me of the first days of Google Reader — it was far too slow to use at first; I haven’t been back since even though it’s probably quite good.

Anyway, this Google Analytics is apparently just Urchin with a new name. And Urchin cost $199. Per month. And now it’s free. So smelly little people like me can play about with it. And it broke for everybody, including existing Urchin users. Oops.

Anyway, some data has appeared today so now I can blog about it. I don’t really think this is aimed at smelly little people like me. It’s a little bit weird; all about things like goals that I don’t have and funnels that I’ve never even heard of. It’s pretty clear that the main target user is the businessman, which would explain the old £199 per month price tag. But there is plenty of interesting stuff for a plain old blogger like me to look at.

It’s got all the usual things that you’d expect from stats: browsers, platforms, resolutions, all the rest of it. It isn’t real time though. At the moment I’ve only got data for up to halfway through Tuesday. Nevertheless, there are some interesting things to see. For instance, it comes as no surprise that a hefty amount of visitors to this blog come from Google — but 70%?! Only 7% of visitors came directly, which kind of shows how much of bubble I’m sitting on when I look at how many visits the blog gets. And 80.53% of visitors ‘bounce’ (i.e. they come to look at one page and then bugger straight back off again). Thanks a bunch!

Another interesting feature is the map overlay. I remember when this dot-on-a-map thing was revolutionary. It’s becoming a bit standard now. Anyway, it says, “Zoom in on any region by right-clicking and selecting “zoom in” in the Display menu.” Basically, you’re using Flash’s own zoom in feature. This results in the location names being unreadably large. A special hello to whoever my reader in Kinghorn is though.

The big disappointment for me, though, is the feature that everybody was going on about. Site Overlay appears not to be working at the moment. That was the feature that interested me most in Google Analytics aswell. Hopefully it will be fixed soon enough though.

Overall, I’m pretty impressed with Google Analytics, but I’ll continue to use Sitemeter et al as well, for the time being at least.

Now, can somebody explain to me what the hell Google Base actually is?