Archive: scottish-tv

Today viewers were given a preview of Scottish and Grampian’s brand new uber-identity, STV — er sorry, I mean stv — which launches next Tuesday.

STV ident The idents are a bit strange. We’re treated to a variety of gormless people goofing about, sometimes in recognisable locations, with a plastic ‘S’ which resembles the old British Steel logo. I think it’s meant to look like they’re all passing the ‘S’ to each other, but the editing is pretty awful so it looks nothing like that. At one point we see a couple of women chatting to each other over a coffee, and this big blue ‘S’ just gets shoved into her hands! Bizarre.

You can see the idents on the video clip attatched to this story on the Scotland Today website. It contains an interview with STV’s big wig Bobby Hain who makes a strange comment about how the two shades of blue in the logo are about people connecting the top to the bottom, or something like that? Where have I seen two shades of blue in a logo before? doctorvee logo

The new logo is nothing though. Here is the press release about it.

stv’s new website, stv.tv , will be launched later this summer and will feature an exciting new range of entertainment, lifestyle, news and sports services.

Hang on a minute, stv.tv? Just in case you weren’t aware that STV is a television channel, they have put ‘tv’ in the URL twice. This new website sounds rubbish anyway. There are already a million generic websites claiming to offer an “exciting range of entertainment, lifestyle, news and sports services.” They need to get with the times. Don’t they realise that the coolest thing for broadcasters to do these days is to buy social network websites? They can’t all have been taken already?!

There will also be an exciting new gaming section designed to satisfy Scotland’s evergreen love of bingo and quiz-show based games.

Translation: $$$!

This bit is interesting though.

Some of the first services available in the coming months on stv.tv will include a minute-by-minute comprehensive news service which will be boosted by users posting their own stories, sound bites and video clips…

So is this STV getting into citizen journalism? It could be interesting… But then again, it could just be a bunch of illiterate neds yapping about fitbaw.

The biggest question, though, is what does the ‘S’ stand for? Surely the answer is obvious: Scottish, surely? Well I heard that STV are eager to downplay the idea that the ‘S’ stands for Scottish or Scotland in case it alienates people in the Grampian region! So apparently the ‘S’ can mean anything you want. That’s what S-Club always used to say, so I assumed it just stood for ‘shite’…

Well that’s another blog milestone notched up. One of my posts has been linked on Wikipedia — an article on Nighttime TV.

Substub which appears to refer to a broadcasting error, the only other reference to which appears to be here. Not notable unless a lot more information emerges.

(Emphasis mine.)

Just as well STV and Grampian are rebranding then…

Do you think it’s worth editing the article? I’m not sure if Nighttime TV is very notable either!

I completely missed this news yesterday. The first time I heard about it, it was buried in a newspaper review on Radio Scotland this morning. SMG have finally decided to stop pretending that they are running two television stations and just be upfront about it. Grampian Television will be gone forever, and the two SMG regions will now be called good old ‘STV’.

Thing is, they’ve actually taken quite a brave decision. Well, kind of. A real brave decision would have involved making good programmes. But by ditching the Grampian name they are opening themselves up to accusations of Glasbolisation and general central belt centredness. People will start to think that SMG are doing things on the cheap by ending regional programmes.

Some sign trouble at Cowcaddens
Sign trouble at Cowcaddens

When I told my dad about this he said, “So are they not going to have regional programmes any more?” Then I pointed out to him that both Scottish and Grampian have been showing almost exactly the same output on both stations (apart from regional news) for years already. In fact, I’m sure I’ve read somewhere that it is actually in their Ofcom licenses that Grampian programmes must be shown on Scottish and vice-versa.

This sort of thing can mean so much to a lot of people. Some MPs are up in arms about it of course. My gran lived in Glenrothes, and when she moved to a different house a few blocks away all of a sudden she found herself in a different ITV region! She said was upset because she’d miss Shereen! Not that that would matter any more anyway…

I guess SMG thought that with the planned sub-regions for the news (two each in Scottish and Grampian) they decided it would be as easy just to have four sub-regions under the one brand. It’s all a bit odd. Launch sub-regional bulletins then sack all the staff! It will probably be painful viewing…

As I say, though, despite the heritage and all that stuff, I am glad they are ditching the regions idea (symbolically at least). Regional television is a relic, a hangover from the 1950s. Does anybody actually like regional television? But local television programmes are usually unduly parochial, made on the cheap and generally don’t make for pleasent viewing. I think the exception is Newsnight Scotland (I know a lot of people dislike it, but it is so much better than the London-based section of Newsnight which is like watching The Day Today; at least they seem to get somewhere on Newsnight Scotland), and that’s more national than regional / local anyway. Local radio and newspapers can be good, but it just doesn’t work on television. It’s also pretty silly for a television station to have over a dozen different names anyway, when the third channel is usually referred to as ‘ITV’.

Most of the ‘regional’ programmes are nothing to do with the region anyway. I could kind of understand it when they did a programme about fishing or something. But that shoestring budget copycat version of Ready Steady Cook, or that programme about films, and that holiday programme? Let’s not forget those repeats of repeats of repeats of repeats of twenty-year-old editions of Weir’s Way. Cheap or what?

It was also plain embarassing watching Scottish / Grampian Television because of how they tried to escape ever mentioning either of the brands for fear of alienating half of the viewers. More often they would just call it This Channel (‘This Channel?’ which one is that then?), and the logo would consist of four generic blue squares. After midnight the channel actually appeared to be called ‘Nighttime TV’, which fooled nobody. This mess is finally being cleared up, with a much tidier ‘STV’.

That’s according to ITV’s marketing people, who have decided that ITV1 needs a name that reflects its programming better. Not really.

Sorry for my third media post in a row (doh), but I’ve just read this article on ITV’s upcoming rebrand, and it is such a pile of absolute minge.

Welcome to the world of marketing, where the BBC is Daddy and Channel 4 is brother. And there was me thinking they were television stations! ITV, incidentally, is nobody — well, at least I agree with that.

…some groups (upmarket men, affluent culture vultures), are so prejudiced against ITV1 that it stops them trying newer services.

This makes it sound like only hoity-toity people dislike ITV1. This isn’t the case — you only need a modicum of brain to hate ITV1 with a burning passion.

You don’t need to be a member of a made-up section of the population in order to like or dislike a channel. *BIG CLUE FOR ITV*: The reason people trust the BBC and Channel 4 is because, occasionally, they make some good programmes. ITV, on the other hand, throw loads of money at some music industry big-wig who has reinvented himself as a pantomime villain and ask him to hold a singing contest where the best singer doesn’t win.

And channels aren’t personified by celebrities either.

As for ITV1, “for me the best aspirational figure would be Robbie Williams, iconic, British, supremely entertaining with the common touch and ability to bring flair, glamour and pathos to his work … in contrast to the BBC and Daddy”.

This just sums it all up. For a second, run along with the idea that the BBC is Daddy (yes, I can see that) and that Channel 4 is brother (yup). ITV1 has decided that, instead of being a cozy close family member, it wants to be some overblown egotistical celebrity that nobody really knows and is well past his best anyway. Good work guys!

Believe it or not, the article just gets worse from there. How tragic. Greg Dyke is much more sensible about it all.

As it happens, ITV1′s new idents sound like they might actually be alright. Just a shame that SMG probably won’t treat us to them. We’ll probably be left with those five-year-old idents where the camera, in slow motion, goes right up the nostrils of somebody who you might have seen reading the news on Scotland Today once or twice but probably left the station a few years ago, but they don’t have any presentation department to make any new idents, or even adapt to ITV plc’s ones, so they’ve just got to make do with it.

Update: More examples of ITV’s new idents here. I think they look quite good from these stills.