<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; openid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/tag/openid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping comments under control</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/12/keeping-comments-under-control/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/12/keeping-comments-under-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbc.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybernats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have-your-say]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metafilter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotsman.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-generated-content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ideas of Civilisation has written a really interesting post about the state of the Scottish blogosphere compared with the dodgy comments that get posted on The Herald&#8216;s website, Scotsman.com and the like. The Scottish blogosphere is indeed, by and large, a pretty good place for a debate. Nowadays it is probably dominated a bit too [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ideasofcivilisation.blogspot.com/2008/06/considered-debate.html">Ideas of Civilisation has written a really interesting post</a> about the state of the Scottish blogosphere compared with the dodgy comments that get posted on <i>The Herald</i>&#8216;s website, Scotsman.com and the like.</p>
<p>The Scottish blogosphere is indeed, by and large, a pretty good place for a debate. Nowadays it is probably dominated a bit too much by SNP supporters, but I think the debate is usually pretty respectful. IoC asks, why does this respectful atmosphere not cross over into the mainstream media comment sites?</p>
<p>The answer is that they are mainstream media comment sites. As <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/07/comments-dont-belong-on-the-msm/">I have pointed out before</a>, trolls, flamers and knuckle-draggers are attracted to MSM comment sites like flies on a shit. The blog <a href="http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/">spEak You&#8217;re bRanes</a>, a blog I mention many times, does a good job of compiling the most ridiculous comments posted to MSM outlets.</p>
<p>The thing is that IoC is right when he says that the debate in the Scottish blogosphere is good. But this isn&#8217;t peculiar to Scotland. The debate in the blogosphere world-wide is also good. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of extreme comments in MSM websites does not just exist on Scottish websites (although Scotland does have a distinct phenomenon with its &#8216;cybernats&#8217;). It is known to media outlets the world over, and even some big websites such as Digg and YouTube.</p>
<p>So why is there such a difference? After all, the point of blogging is meant to be that it&#8217;s really easy to get involved in. So why don&#8217;t people with poisonous views pollute the blogosphere so easily?</p>
<p>The answer is that it&#8217;s so simple to avoid poisonous people in the blogosphere. Does someone have a terrible blog? That&#8217;s okay, because no-one will read it. Knuckle-dragging extremists find that they will reach a far wider audience if they post on a website like Scotsman.com or the BBC.</p>
<p>There is another answer. Even though in theory it is easy to set up a blog, the reality is slightly different. You still have to put in quite a lot of effort. It can be time-consuming and you have to come up with the goods to make sure people read it. If you are not interested in having a genuine discussion, you will soon find that blogging is quite costly. But for those who are willing to put the effort in for there to be a good debate, the pay-off can be good. For this reason, bloggers tend to be more articulate, reasoned and intelligent than your average Have Your Sayer.</p>
<p>Does this mean that we should give up on the idea of having comments on the BBC&#8217;s blogs or <i>The Herald</i>&#8216;s political stories? Far from it. All you have to do to improve the nature of the debate is create the right mechanism to ensure that the cream will rise up.</p>
<p>Websites such as Digg and YouTube have implemented a voting mechanism in an attempt to get rid of trolls. You can choose to give a comment a &#8216;thumbs up&#8217; or a &#8216;thumbs down&#8217;. The BBC&#8217;s Have Your Say has a similar voting mechanism. However, this doesn&#8217;t work in my view. In fact, if anything, it exacerbates the problem. It just makes the comments section even more of a hotbed of demagoguery &#8212; the loudest attention seekers, not the most reasoned and articulate, will grab the most votes.</p>
<p>Some websites are just lucky enough to have a good audience that respects debate. <a href="http://www.economist.com/"><i>The Economist</i>&#8216;s website</a> is said to be relatively free of HYS-style trolls. That is probably due to the target audience of the publication. I suspect many HYSers aren&#8217;t even aware of the existence of <i>The Economist</i> and if they are, they aren&#8217;t interested in posting there because it&#8217;s not a publication for them.</p>
<p>However, for the more mass-market audiences of the likes of the BBC, <i>The Herald</i> and <i>The Scotsman</i>, it&#8217;s too late to do anything about this. They made a decision long ago to appeal to the masses, so its audience will have that demagogic element that will be reflected in the comments.</p>
<p>Another alternative might be to force users to post under their real names. It is generally believed that once people&#8217;s cloak of anonymity has been removed, their online debating style becomes more respectful and considered.</p>
<p>On the other hand, many bloggers and commenters have genuine reason to wish to remain anonymous. And, barring the universal adoption of an <a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a>-style system, it would be nigh on impossible to police. A decent &#8216;middle ground&#8217; option might be to place OpenID comments at the top of the thread and hide the anonymous comments towards the bottom of the page.</p>
<p>Another possible solution is simply to make it costly for the ill-informed jokers to take part. For some, it may be an anathema to make people pay to post comments &#8212; almost against the culture of the web. But it needn&#8217;t be.</p>
<p>There is one big website that is known for having decent comments sections that avoid the numbskullery of sites such as YouTube &#8212; <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/">MetaFilter</a>. There <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/10/can-5-improve-reader-comments/">it costs $5 to post comments</a>. That is a one-time life-long fee. Pay $5 and you can post to your heart&#8217;s content. There is also a one-week time lag between signing up and being able to post.</p>
<p>This ensures that only the people who are interested in contributing properly get involved. $5 is quite a small fee for those who really value MetaFilter, but it is enough to deter time-wasting trolls. A one-week time lag also prevents people from just posting a crazy extreme rant in the heat of the moment. Just like blogging, MetaFilter is costly for the time-wasters, but beneficial for those who want to make a genuine contribution.</p>
<p>The solution for the MSM websites if they want to clean out their comment sections is therefore to somehow create a mechanism that makes it costly for extremist ranters to post, but makes it beneficial for those who want to take part in a reasoned debate.</p>
<p>Perhaps a MeFi-style one-off fee or a time lag might do the trick. If you had to pay, say, £5 to open a lifetime account on Scotsman.com to allow you to post, you might just go for it if that £5 was enough to deter the ranting trolls. It could also be a handy (though potentially small) additional source of income for the media outlets.</p>
<p>IoC&#8217;s issue isn&#8217;t just with the media websites though. It&#8217;s also with the Scottish Government&#8217;s website. If a government website becomes an outlet for extreme views, that is undoubtedly a problem. The Scottish Government&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/a-national-conversation">National Conversation</a>&#8221; has been accused of being &#8220;<a href="http://news.scotsman.com/scottishindependence/SNP39s-national--conversation-39a.4019944.jp">a chatroom for cybernats</a>&#8220;. That was probably always inevitable. After all, a &#8220;conversation&#8221; about independence initiated by the SNP is bound not to last long or be very meaningful.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I have to applaud the Scottish Government for going ahead with the project. To have user-generated content on a government website is pretty big stuff if you ask me and it&#8217;s probably the right thing to do &#8212; engaging the citizens in the policy-making process and all that.</p>
<p>But the contributions have to be meaningful. I&#8217;ve not been following the National Conversation very closely. Skimming through it just now, it doesn&#8217;t look too bad, but obviously it&#8217;s caused concern among some.</p>
<p>Perhaps for user-generated content on government websites there should be an expectation that you do not contribute anonymously. I think that is probably a reasonable expectation for someone who wants to take part in civic society. People who write a letter to their MP or MSP or another figure in public office can&#8217;t expect a reply without supplying a name and address. The <a href="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/">Government&#8217;s e-petition website</a> also requires you to enter a name and address. The authenticity of some of these names is questionable though.</p>
<p>Perhaps future projects like the National Conversation might require people to supply real names and addresses (not publicly viewable of course) in order to participate. This would remove the cloak of anonymity and improve the likelihood of there being a sensible debate. Looking at the National Conversation website, it looks like most (but not all) participants are contributing under their real names anyway. Still, it&#8217;s a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/12/keeping-comments-under-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s happening here</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/31/whats-happening-here/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/31/whats-happening-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 03:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vee8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First things first. I have upgraded to WordPress 2.5. The new admin panel takes a bit of getting used to, and it is a little bit buggy for my liking. But then again that is probably because I am using so many plugins. For the first time I upgraded using the astonishing WordPress Automatic Upgrade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first. I have upgraded to WordPress 2.5. The new admin panel takes a bit of getting used to, and it is a little bit buggy for my liking. But then again that is probably because I am using so many plugins.</p>
<p>For the first time I upgraded using the astonishing <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wordpress-automatic-upgrade/">WordPress Automatic Upgrade plugin</a>. I&#8217;ve been meaning to use it for a while, but forgot about it until <a href="http://jamesomalley.co.uk/blog/">James O&#8217;Malley</a> reminded me. So thanks for that James. Upgrading vee8 and doctorvee was flawless, although something funny happened to Scottish Roundup. Fixed it in the end (I hope), but it did make me scratch my head, especially as the other two upgrades went so smoothly.</p>
<p>Another thing to point out is that I have finally got that OpenID plugin installed. It doesn&#8217;t work <em>exactly</em> how I&#8217;d like it to, but it will do. Don&#8217;t be freaked out by it if you leave a comment and you don&#8217;t know what OpenID is. You can leave the OpenID field blank.</p>
<p>You might be wondering if it was even worth me upgrading this blog. It is rather shit of me to have posted next to nothing for the past three weeks and come back with a dull admin post. Well here&#8217;s what&#8217;s happening.</p>
<p>Last week in the comments of this increasingly quiet blog, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/15/a-reminder-vee8/#comment-408273">a very public sociologist wrote</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Looks like F1 has stolen you away from us.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s kind of true. When I launched vee8, originally I had every intention of posting here (almost) as often as before.</p>
<p>What I was forgetting was that because of my <em>mad hectic busy important 24/7 lifestyle</em> and / or laziness, I was blogging less and less here anyway. In all seriousness, I am in my final year at university. And while I still have luxuries such as not having to get up before lunchtime, it does mean that I get shards of guilt searing through my conscience every time I write a blog post or open Google Reader. After all, I should be studying.</p>
<p>For around &#8212; ooh, let&#8217;s see &#8212; the past year, I have had hardly any time to blog, or indeed read blogs. Google Reader always has 1000+ items for me to read. I think I&#8217;ve only got it down to zero about twice in the past year.</p>
<p>Plainly, even pretending that I can keep on top of all my RSS feeds is a nonsense. I have come to realise that I don&#8217;t have the time to read blogs in the same way as I used to. I have probably gone for weeks without even reading blogs actually (excepting Scottish blogs which I have to read for the Roundup). And the thing is that I don&#8217;t really miss the blogosphere &#8212; especially the politics blogs. (My years at university studying politics have ironically made me deeply apathetic.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Boo, hiss,&#8221; I hear you cry. But that&#8217;s the way it is. Once I got fed up with Guido et al, it was just the start of the ball rolling and reading hundreds of <a href="http://flyingrodent.blogspot.com/2008/03/common-sense.html">posts like this</a> is no longer my idea of fun.</p>
<p>This is not to say that I will retreat from politics or political blogging &#8212; and definitely not blogging as a whole &#8212; altogether. But I have to face up to the fact that as a student I have increasingly found that I do not have enough time to engage in it properly.</p>
<p>So many of the posts I have written over the past few months have been about topics that were lingering in my head for weeks or even months. For instance, the one about <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/02/reasons-to-favour-road-tolls/">road tolls</a> was written in my head in December as a response to Calum Cashley. I didn&#8217;t get the chance to actually write it until March. See if you can spot more (a fun game for long journeys, I&#8217;m sure)!</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s like when I am a lazy student bum! So what on earth is it going to be like when I actually get a proper job?!</p>
<p>At the same time, last month I launched vee8, a dedicated Formula 1 blog. The original intention was to spare the many readers here who do not like F1 from having to read what can at some points during the year become a blog almost exclusively about F1.</p>
<p>But in its first month I think vee8 has quite unexpectedly taken a life of its own. I am enjoying every minute of it. It is such a refreshing feeling to be blogging about something that actually matters rather than that politics nonsense! <img src='http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Seriously though, I have been staggered by how much fun I am having with it and how successful it has been.</p>
<p>I try to avoid talking about stats because inevitably someone takes offence at the showing off. So I&#8217;ll say this up-front. The following may be a reflection of how bad this blog is. Readership here has, after all, stagnated over the past 2 or 3 years which shouldn&#8217;t really happen (as someone once told me, telling me off for showing off my stats, &#8220;it&#8217;s a viral thing&#8221;).</p>
<p>But at vee8 &#8212; which, I remind you, is little over a month old &#8212; I am already getting as more &#8220;returning visitors&#8221; than I am on this blog. As I say, that is probably partly down to the fact that I post here far less often than I used to, while there is usually daily content at vee8. But I&#8217;m still amazed at how quickly it has got a solid readership. Obviously it helps that I had plenty of F1 fans reading here originally, but boy &#8212; if only I found it this easy to get readers the first time round!</p>
<p>Long story short. I am now running three major blogs. Scottish Roundup has to have a new post every Sunday, so a lot of my Fridays and Saturdays are spent making sure that happens. vee8 is fresh, new and exciting and this season looks like it&#8217;s going to be a corker, so a lot of my attention is now focussed there. This one is my personal blog, so I don&#8217;t feel like I owe it much attention.</p>
<p>Just two years ago this was my only blog. Now it is just part of my wider blogging activity. With that fact along with impending adulthood, I am having to steer a new path for this blog.</p>
<p>I am probably being melodramatic (it is 4am), so I will say that probably not much will change. In fact, the changes have already happened and I just need to adapt to it.</p>
<p>I stopped being part of the conversation in the wider blogosphere a long time ago without ever meaning that to happen. I just don&#8217;t have the time to follow it. So that probably means writing fewer, more in depth posts on a miscellany of subjects.</p>
<p>You might well have noticed that already. The previous five posts here were about coffee, Autechre, income tax, Freeview and Radio 5 Live &#8212; quite a mixture. And that takes us practically to the beginning of March. To think that I used to write an average of six pithy posts per day about the day&#8217;s current subjects!</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t pick up any time soon. Those shards of guilt will be extra painful as it&#8217;s exam time. But I have just three exams, and then it will all be over! The difficult part comes after that &#8212; looking for a job. (My status as a person, incidentally, is another thing that it making me more reluctant to blog here&#8230; Google and all.)</p>
<p>I just remembered that <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/04/01/fed-up-with-being-a-blogger/">almost a year ago</a> I <em>hilariously</em> joked about giving up blogging. Now I am looking back on the past year thinking it was actually quite prescient.</p>
<p>Anyway, please forgive the navel gazing. I am planning to return tomorrow with another post here, but whether it will interest you is a different matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/31/whats-happening-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new look</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/18/a-new-look/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/18/a-new-look/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associated-rediffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cambria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[custom fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[favicons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fonts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravatars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardian unlimied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helvetica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identicons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharethis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times new roman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumblelog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verdana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/18/a-new-look/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#8217;ve decided to give the blog a new look again. I couldn&#8217;t wait to get this up, but it&#8217;s not quite finished. I still need to do a few tweaks here and there. (Surprise surprise, it looks a bit guff in Internet Exploder.) But it&#8217;s quite late now and I can&#8217;t bring myself to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve decided to give the blog a new look again. I couldn&#8217;t wait to get this up, but it&#8217;s not quite finished. I still need to do a few tweaks here and there. (Surprise surprise, it looks a bit guff in Internet Exploder.) But it&#8217;s quite late now and I can&#8217;t bring myself to switch it back to the old theme, so I&#8217;m throwing caution to the wind and leaving it up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll update this post later some time in the afternoon explaining the thinking behind it all. In the meantime, if you spot any problems or if you have any suggestions, please leave a comment.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Okay, so now I have the time to post a bit about what I&#8217;ve done here.</p>
<p>Perhaps the first thing I should point out is the fact that, regrettably, some URLs have changed. Permalinks to posts and the like should still work perfectly. But you&#8217;ll notice that I&#8217;ve moved the pages in the navigation panel around a bit. I&#8217;ve also reorganised the categories (in fact, I haven&#8217;t quite finished that yet).</p>
<p>Speaking of categories, I have finally created a &#8216;media&#8217; category. It never quite made sense for media posts to be listed under &#8216;entertainment&#8217;, particularly if I was writing about some kind of media coverage of a serious story. So I&#8217;ve gone ahead and separated them, and now television, radio and newspapers are listed under media. As such, some category URLs have also changed, so sorry about that if you had them bookmarked or something.</p>
<p>So why the change? Well, I am still very fond of the old design. It will probably make a reappearance somewhere &#8212; possibly on another blog. But perhaps I will release it as a WordPress theme for others to use &#8212; if I can find the time to make the appropriate tweaks to it.</p>
<p>Despite my pride though, I was always aware that a lot of people were not very keen on the previous design. And it has been there for almost a year. (Maybe this change will become an annual occurrence, a doctorvee Christmas tradition.)</p>
<p>Common complaints were about the dark background (apparently an acquired taste) and the bright links. So I&#8217;ve decided to swing back to a white background and rather more muted colours, if you can call green muted.</p>
<p>This is also the equivalent of growing a moustache to try and signify that you are growing up (not that many people grow moustaches these days, but you know what I mean). The previous design was deliberately jazzy and distinctive. But since then I have become a <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/03/20/thumbs-up-for-iriver/">can&#8217;t-get-away-from-it adult</a>. And in the next few months I will hopefully be finished with university.</p>
<p>So that means ditching the childish neon colours and adopting a serif font. I have spoken before about <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/03/17/a-new-zenith-of-sadness/">my devotion to Verdana</a>, but I am afraid I have become rather tired of it. It is suffering from Times New Roman syndrome.</p>
<p>You know. It&#8217;s become a ubiquitous, default font. As such, it is used in so many pieces of ugly design. We have all stumbled upon badly thrown-together websites written in Verdana, just as we see too many <a href="http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/">passive aggressive notes</a> written in Times New Roman.</p>
<p>I had become very keen on the recently redesigned websites for <a href="http://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/">Times Online</a> and <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/">Guardian Unlimited</a>. Both use plenty of Georgia, so I was going to use that. Besides Times New Roman, it&#8217;s the only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_fonts_for_the_Web">core serif font</a> anyway.</p>
<p>But while I was designing I visited <a href="http://www.modernlifeisrubbish.co.uk/">Modern Life</a> which uses <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambria_%28typeface%29">Cambria</a>. It is basically the Vista version of Times New Roman, but lovely. I fell in love and decided to use the font on my blog. But as far as I know Cambria is only available on Vista, so for everyone else it is still Georgia.</p>
<p>A funny thing about Cambria is that it appears to be extraordinarily small, so the font size is rather large. But there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that I suppose.</p>
<p>Headings and some other bits and pieces are in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helvetica">Helvetica</a> where possible, although Windows users (including me!) will have to make do with Arial. I know it&#8217;s a bit clichéd, and rather too ubiquitous, but you never grow tired of it. I do love Helvetica so I was keen to use it when I decided to give the blog a cleaner design.</p>
<p>I suppose now is a good time to talk about the general inspiration for the redesign. I was tempted to go back to a clinical, Helvetica-led design when I first saw <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/exclusive-screen-shots-and-feature-overview-of-delicious-20-preview/">screenshots for the new beta version of Delicious</a>. Delicious is a very apt word. Mind you, the end result on this blog has ended up looking very little like the Delicious screenshots.</p>
<p>A more direct inspiration has been the beautifully-designed <a href="http://www.lokeshdhakar.com/">Lokesh Dhakar</a> website. In fact, parts of this blog&#8217;s design have turned out to be embarrassingly similar. I first came across his blog when I read <a href="http://www.lokeshdhakar.com/2007/08/20/an-illustrated-coffee-guide/">this guide to different kinds of coffee</a> and it instantly struck me as an excellent design.</p>
<p>Layout-wise, I very much went for the &#8216;less is more&#8217; approach. This has meant compromises in places, but I&#8217;ll go on to that. The main change is that I&#8217;ve moved away from a three column layout to two columns. I had read somewhere that multiple columns just confuse people, which makes sense. So it&#8217;s back to one sidebar.</p>
<p>I was keen to get everything lined up nicely with each other. This does make it look quite neat, but one problem is that the main column is quite close to the sidebar. The solution was to have a neat line running along the left of the sidebar, although I&#8217;m still not sure if it is enough. I toyed with using full justification, but decided in the end that the cons outweighed the pros.</p>
<p>Despite the intimate position of the main column and the sidebar, the page is wider than before. Making good use of the space available and all that. As such, the design only really works if your screen is at least 1024 pixels wide. But the same was true of the previous design. And people with smaller screens make up around 3% of this blog&#8217;s visitors. Sorry to those 3%, but the rest of us just get masses of white space.</p>
<p>On to the content. One thing you&#8217;ll notice is that categories are now taking pride of place above every single post. They used to be hidden away, only appearing in the sidebar of single post pages.</p>
<p>The reason I&#8217;ve made them more prominent is because over the years I have become more and more guilty about the fact that this blog is a bit of a ragbag of different topics. And the Formula 1 posts in particular are beginning to overshadow everything else. So having the category as the first thing of every post is just a heads-up for everyone, so that you know what the post is about and you can easily skip the posts you aren&#8217;t interested in.</p>
<p>Another new addition is subtitles. I saw this on a few other blogs and really liked the idea, so I&#8217;m going to give it a go. Inspired by <a href="http://justintadlock.com/archives/2007/10/16/using-wordpress-custom-fields-subtitles">this article</a>, I did it using custom fields, a feature of WordPress that I have never really explored before.</p>
<p>Gone from the top of the post, however, are the date and the comments link. The date still appears there on single posts, but I am thinking of including them everywhere again. I already feel a bit lost without them (although I didn&#8217;t use dates much on any of the designs I used before the previous one).</p>
<p>I am also open to putting the comments link back up there, although the link still appears at the bottom of the post as expected. Any comments on this would be appreciated.</p>
<p>I have also taken the plunge and decided to add a <a href="http://sharethis.com/">ShareThis</a> button, despite <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/18/why-do-those-social-bookmarking-links-exist/">what I wrote about it</a> a few months ago. I&#8217;m still experimenting with the position of this, so any ideas would be welcome.</p>
<p>Over to the sidebar. I&#8217;ve reduced the amount of stuff that&#8217;s there to a bare minimum. The latest comment is still there as I like to highlight the great discussions that go on in the comments, which is really what blogging is all about.</p>
<p>Twitter is still there, although I&#8217;ve reduced it to just the latest update rather than the last three. Delicious too has been reduced to just the five most recent links. I normally post to Delicious more often than five times a day, so this might be a bit odd. But there is method to my madness.</p>
<p>I made a decision a short while ago that this blog should concentrate mainly on original content. That&#8217;s just the way the blog has evolved, and I don&#8217;t really like to fob people off with YouTube clips all the time.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s good to highlight interesting websites and videos. After all, that was the original meaning of the word &#8216;weblog&#8217;, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7147728.stm">celebrating its tenth anniversary</a> this week. So I will create another home for them. Probably a tumblelog, but I will get round to that later.</p>
<p>The other prominent feature on the main page (and, indeed, every page, the big whore that I am) is adverts. An early version of this design had the adverts appearing in a garish green colour scheme, but I screwed my head on enough to revert to a more sane grey version. I am ridiculously proud of having the idea of paying homage to <a href="http://www2.tv-ark.org.uk/itvlondon/rediffusion-main.html">Associated-Rediffusion</a>, which wouldn&#8217;t really have worked with the green scheme.</p>
<p>The part of the design I am most worried about is the comments. For some reason, I always find the comments section the most difficult to design, and this time was no different.</p>
<p>I decided to move the comment author information to the left of the comment rather than above. Part of this was to get the full size of the Gravatar displayed, which would take up too much room if you have it above. It is also a layout familiar to message board users, so no real issue there.</p>
<p>There is a problem, however, if somebody has quite a long word in their name. In a recent example, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-259012">Bellgrovebelle is cut off</a>, although there are worse examples. Thankfully, these are quite rare and hopefully not too distracting.</p>
<p>As has already been noted by <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/18/a-new-look/#comment-265581">Ollie in the comments</a> to this post, there is an inconsistency between the sizes of the Gravatars and the <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/11/avatars-are-back/">Identicons</a>. I&#8217;ve not worked too hard on this yet, although my attempts so far have only produced pixellated-looking Identicons. I am working on it though.</p>
<p>Other features I&#8217;m thinking about adding to the comments section are favicons and OpenID.</p>
<p>In the pages (about, archives, etc.) I have also removed a lot of stuff that I didn&#8217;t really consider important any more. I&#8217;m thinking of completely uninstalling the post popularity plugin as this blog now has a post ratings system which I prefer. As for the other stuff, see if you can work out what&#8217;s gone. I doubt anyone will be too upset.</p>
<p>One last thing. I am using some icons from the <a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/lab/icons/silk/">Silk set</a> by <a href="http://www.famfamfam.com/">Fam Fam Fam</a>. I&#8217;ve still not quite finished this aspect of the design, as I&#8217;m not sure which bits should have icons and which shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I think that just about covers it. Sorry this post went on for so long. I would be grateful to hear any comments or ideas. And of course, if something seems broken then please let me know about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/18/a-new-look/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moan, whine, isn&#8217;t that what a LiveJournal is for?</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/23/moan-whine-isnt-that-what-a-livejournal-is-for/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/23/moan-whine-isnt-that-what-a-livejournal-is-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commuting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[econometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiveJournal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/23/moan-whine-isnt-that-what-a-livejournal-is-for/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might have noticed that I haven&#8217;t posted for a few days. I shouldn&#8217;t even have written that post about Celebrity Big Brother, but I couldn&#8217;t really stop myself. I didn&#8217;t proofread it properly which is why it came complete with a glaring error in the post title for five whole days. It&#8217;s been crazy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have noticed that I haven&#8217;t posted for a few days. I shouldn&#8217;t even have written that <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/18/where-else-were-channel-4-supposed-to-do/">post about Celebrity Big Brother</a>, but I couldn&#8217;t really stop myself. I didn&#8217;t proofread it properly which is why it came complete with a glaring error in the post title for five whole days.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been crazy over the weekend. I had this mad Econometrics project to hand in on Monday. Once upon a time the deadline for it was the 4<sup>th</sup> of December, but so many people complained that it got moved all the way back to the 22<sup>nd</sup> of January. I still crapped it up.</p>
<p>You see, it involves using a certain computer program for carrying out econometric analysis. The program probably costs hundreds of pounds, so you&#8217;re meant to do it all in the computer labs at the university. I probably spent a couple of hours each day last week, but as the deadline closed in it consumed more and more of my time.</p>
<p>You see, what I was doing was just doing all of the regressions at university and emailing the results to myself so that I could analyse them at home. This was a <em>huge</em> mistake. Every single night &#8212; every single night! &#8212; I realised that I had made some kind of error that meant I had to start all over again. And I had work every day over the weekend. So I got up at 7am on Saturday morning to trudge into Edinburgh for the library opening at 9am.</p>
<p>It was eerily quiet in the library at that time. When I got there there was only one other person in the usually packed-out computer lab. Some cleaners came along after a while though to lighten the mood. I had to finish up by about half past eleven though so that I could get to work. Not my happiest day ever.</p>
<p>Of course, that night I realised that I had made a mistake so I had to go in on Sunday as well. I turned up at the train station to discover that there weren&#8217;t any trains from Kirkcaldy, so I had to wait for the bloody replacement bus service which I had to wait ages for as well. In total it took me two and a half hours just to get to the library. What a waste of time!</p>
<p>Then I came home and tried to write the report. Remember, this was Sunday, and the deadline was for Monday. Inevitably, I had discovered that I had done it all wrong. Sunday evening was really bleak. I was in deep trouble with a project that was originally supposed to be handed in seven weeks before!</p>
<p>So I salvaged what I could on Sunday evening and got up at 6am on Monday morning to get into the library and just do all of the work I had to do and write the report. In the end it was actually quite easy, but that was possibly because I was beyond caring. Obviously isn&#8217;t not going to turn out amazing, but at least hopefully it will pass. I had completely finished the report by about 11:30, which left me plenty of time to have a relaxing lunch before handing it in. And then going to work.</p>
<p>I thought I wasn&#8217;t going to get a rest, but this morning I woke up at about half past 10. I had no recollection of switching my alarm clocks off, but they both had been switched off. That&#8217;s when you know you&#8217;re sleep deprived and you know you need to take a rest. I promised I wouldn&#8217;t do that. After all, not working at the time probably contributed a lot to my problems with econometrics (that, and the fact that econometrics is the worst subject ever).</p>
<p>But bollocks to that. I have no spare time any more. A couple of hours here and there to blog if I&#8217;m lucky. No time to watch the DVDs I got for Christmas. No time to listen to all of the CDs I bought <em>before</em> Christmas. A pile of books that I&#8217;ve been meaning to read since <em>last summer</em>. And a huge list of personal goals that I know I&#8217;ll never have the chance to meet.</p>
<p>So I took the day off university.</p>
<p>You might sense from this post that I&#8217;ve not been in the best of moods recently. And you know what that means. <a href="http://doctorvee.livejournal.com/">My LiveJournal</a> is coming back into action. Maybe. I kind of drifted away from posting on it, especially after I decided to write more &#8216;personal&#8217; posts on this blog. I&#8217;ve also had some strange log in issues with LiveJournal which I couldn&#8217;t be bothered sorting out.</p>
<p>Anyway, now is probably a good point in my life to start writing on my LiveJournal again, but this time it&#8217;s going to be friends only. So if you want to read it, <a href="http://doctorvee.livejournal.com/profile">add me</a> as a friend and see if I add you back. You don&#8217;t have to have a LiveJournal account &#8212; you can gain access to LiveJournal using <a href="http://openid.net/">OpenID</a> (if you don&#8217;t know what OpenID is, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenID">check out the Wikipedia article</a>).</p>
<p>Normal-ish blogging will resume shortly, hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/23/moan-whine-isnt-that-what-a-livejournal-is-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

