Lewis Hamilton has been at it again with the whining. This time he is “fuming” over the fact that Fernando Alonso had the audacity to try and have a motor race with him. In the middle of a Grand Prix as well! Whatever will happen next!

It is true that Hamilton was forced onto the run-off area by Alonso’s aggressive move. But you see such a thing happen probably about a dozen times a year. It is just part of motor racing. Indeed, Hamilton himself came very close to doing the same thing to Felipe Massa at Monza last week.

It was an immensely exciting start. The possibility of fireworks between Alonso and Hamilton is real and mouthwatering. We almost got that at Spa with the battle at the first corner. What’s more, Hamilton got a good run out of La Source and ended up going side-by-side with Alonso into the entry to the intimidating Eau Rouge corner.

This is what motor racing is about. If Hamilton doesn’t like it, he ought to go fishing instead.

This has turned out to be McLaren’s annus horribilis when it should have been a year of celebration. After an unprecedented series of years in the doldrums on the track, McLaren have finally gone back to their winning ways. But off the track, it is difficult to imagine what else could have gone wrong.

It would have been bad enough had it just been the Stepneygate scandal from which McLaren (at the time) escaped any harsh punishment (probably rightly given the evidence there was at the time). But despite escaping punishment, the cloud of suspicion lingered, the media was not impressed and the tifosi were livid.

But there have also been rows over team orders and the status of the drivers which was kicked off by a deterioration in the relationship between Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton. McLaren probably have the two best drivers in the world in their cars, but instead of being an unmitigated success it has turned out to be a disaster.

At Hungary the FIA stepped in to prevent McLaren from scoring constructors’ points due to what was essentially an issue between the two drivers. It was harsh to levy such a heavy penalty on McLaren due to something that the team itself was seemingly quite peripheral to.

Then at Monza the race stewards decided to fine the team $50,000 for running a lightweight gearbox at the Hungaroring. The race stewards say that the new gearbox should have been crash tested prior to being run. For their part, McLaren say they were open with the FIA at all times about the existence their new gearbox.

Even if the FIA were not made aware of the situation, you have to ask the question: what were the Italian stewards doing passing judgement on something that happened two races ago? There is a discussion on this over at BlogF1. This is the equivalent of a referee in a football match giving a footballer a yellow card for something he did three weeks ago.

This is not to say that the FIA should not have punished McLaren. But the race stewards are not the people to do it. And the scrutineers at Hungary were seemingly okay with the new gearbox. It all looks a bit fishy to me, particularly since it happened at the Italian Grand Prix. Italy is, of couse, the country where Ferrari almost rivals Catholicism as the biggest religion.

A similar thing happened last year at the Italian Grand Prix when Fernando Alonso was penalised for “blocking” a Ferrari that was a hundred metres behind him. The video of the entire lap is still available. Yes, that distant speck on the horizon is meant to be blocking Felipe Massa. The only people in the world who actually believe this are FIArrari.

But the FIA does not have to be in Italy to unfairly find in favour of Ferrari and against every single other team. Jackie Stewart rightly pointed this out today.

Now the whole Stepneygate saga is being opened up again, and the World Motor Sport Council is meeting on Thursday to discuss it. It will be a big day for Formula 1. Will the FIA cave into their pro-Ferrari instincts and award the Scuderia the Championship in the courtroom? Or will they act like the governing body of a sport and allow the Championship to be won and lost on the racetrack?

This series of events has prompted some to ask: are McLaren being picked on by the FIA this season? Craig has also taken a look at this. Many have mentioned the fact that FIA president Max Mosley has a pretty frosty relationship with Ron Dennis. The FIA deny that there is a witch hunt, but they would say that wouldn’t they?

For what it’s worth, I do not think that the FIA are deliberately singling out McLaren. At least, not beyond the extent we have come to expect from the FIA’s pro-Ferrari bias. But I think the adverse reaction to the original WMSC hearing in July has encouraged the FIA to punish McLaren heavily for the slightest wrongdoing.

The FIA are quite right to re-open the Stepneygate case if they think there is sufficient evidence. The integrity of the sport is important, and if McLaren are found to have benefited from Ferrari documents then they should face a heavy punishment.

But to me, it just does not stack up for the reasons I explained in my previous post on Stepneygate. The McLaren car had already been built by the time Mike Coughlan got his hands on the documents, and from then on basing developments on Ferrari blueprints would surely be like trying to piece together pieces from two different jigsaw puzzles.

But the whole saga became much more serious when drivers became involved. It is suggested that Fernando Alonso gained some insight into set-up data as a result of an email conversation with test driver Pedro de la Rosa, who is good buddies with Mike Coughlan.

This could prove crucial because beforehand McLaren had claimed that no employee was aware of the Ferrari information except for Mike Coughlan. If it transpires that de la Rosa and Alonso also knew, then there could be serious consequences.

A lot of people are asking themselves how the FIA could punish McLaren (if they are found guilty) without damaging the great story of this World Championship — particularly the emergence of the hugely exciting Lewis Hamilton. There is a nasty idea in my head that the FIA could end up punishing McLaren and punishing Alonso (because of the emails) but exonerating Hamilton. That way, Hamilton can win the World Championship while McLaren still get punished.

Yesterday Rory left a comment on this blog pointing out that the rumoured conversation between de la Rosa and Alonso was infact a fabrication. But that does not mean that the emails did not exist. They could have contained perfectly innocent information — or it could have been far worse than suggested by La Gazzetta dello Sport.

For the integrity of F1, and for the sake of this year’s fantastic World Championship, let us hope it is the former.

Update: See also Formula 1 Insight: Sport and Politics in Formula One.

Well, that was a surprise. The Italian Grand Prix seemed destined to be dull. Monza is an anomaly in today’s Formula 1. It is a fast slipstreaming circuit in an age where slipstreaming is effectively discouraged by the aerodynamic features of the cars. We saw last year how it is impossible for F1 cars to follow closely on a circuit like Monza.

But the funny thing about Formula 1 is that whenever you are ready to give up and declare overtaking to be officially impossible, away they go and start overtaking each other! Suzuka 2005 springs to mind as well. Okay, so Monza 2007 cannot hold a candle to Suzuka 2005. But it was still a pleasant surprise to see what was expected to be a processional race turn out to be quite interesting.

Most impressive of all was Lewis Hamilton. He might not be the nicest person, but his racing is absolutely superb. His start line battle with Felipe Massa was firm but fair, and a joy to watch.

And his amazing lunge on Kimi Räikkönen towards the end of the race is surely a contender for move of the year. It was not just the move itself, but the fact that it was so unexpected. After the race Räikkönen claimed that he saw Hamilton coming the whole time, but I’m not convinced. Räikkönen panicked and moved to the left as soon as Hamilton came up the inside.

It is interesting to note that Räikkönen’s instinct was to immediately move to the left to avoid a collision with Hamilton. Meanwhile, yet again, Hamilton saw an opportunity, pounced, and completed the move with 100% commitment. There is no hint that Hamilton will ever get intimidated by any situation. Most drivers who try that kind of move end up completely missing the chicane. But Hamilton negotiated it with perfection.

But, despite the impressive start and the flashy overtaking manoeuvres, Hamilton finished 2^nd. Alonso won the race because he put his foot down and kept it down for the entire race. Alonso’s second stint probably shows where he is more experienced. He just drove off from Hamilton, who seemingly fell asleep a bit. Alonso rightly saw that as the opportunity to tie the race up.

There is also the plain fact that Alonso was faster than Hamilton at Monza. Alonso qualified ahead of Hamilton despite having a heavier fuel load. Yet again, despite all of the hype surrounding Hamilton, there was somebody who was doing a better job (albeit not putting on a better show) than him.

As for Ferrari, it looks all over for them (on the racetrack at least). I think most people must have been expecting them to dominate at Monza, but there were well off the pace. The decision to put Räikkönen on a one-stop strategy was a clever risk that they almost pulled off. But Hamilton’s amazing overtaking manoeuvre put paid to that, and Ferrari had to make do with 3^rd.

And then there are the strange things going on with their cars. Massa got a suspension failure (although this may have been down to a first-lap collision), and Räikkönen had that strange (and scary) accident during free practice. (I would put a video here, but FOM have taken them all off YouTube. Great way to promote the sport, guys!)

BMW will be disappointed. I expected them to do better at Monza — to perhaps even be on the podium like they were last year. But both cars ended up being a minute behind the leader by the end of the race. The gap was less than half of that last time round.

Conversely, Honda will be pleased. They got into the final part of qualifying, which is just amazing given the season that they have had so far. And Button managed to bring the car home in 8^th, without any major retirements (apart from Massa) ahead of him. If only all those other circuits didn’t have those pesky corners!

All-in-all, Ferrari look as though they are out of contention. I did not expect that. On balance, McLaren have been the stronger team for most of the season, but Ferrari always looked like they were going to bounce back. But that bounce has always turned out to be a damp squib.

We did have an exciting four-way title fight, but now that is at best a three-way fight. And who would have expected Massa to be the first to drop out after the season he has had? Now Ferrari will have to throw their weight behind Räikkönen who has had plenty of off-days this season.

The saddest thing of all though is the fact that the World Championship could be won and lost in the World Motor Sport Council hearing on Thursday. After the exciting championship we have been given on the track, it would be terrible for it all to be taken away off the track.

You know, I didn’t think the FIA or the World Motor Sport Council had it in them, but they’ve managed it — they have actually made the right decision. Moreover, they have made a decision that has angered Ferrari! Blow me down!

While the media has been tempted to spin this as motorsport’s governing body letting McLaren off the hook, this misses an important point. There isn’t much evidence that McLaren have done anything wrong. The saga remains an issue concerning two rogue employees — Mike Coughlan of McLaren and Nigel Stepney of Ferrari.

There is no evidence that McLaren have benefited at all from the Ferrari documents. Indeed, there is not even evidence that the documents were ever in the possession of any McLaren employee except for Mike Coughlan. And while, as chief designer of McLaren, he was a pretty important figure, he can not have had the time to do much with the documents anyway.

Somebody yesterday said to me that it was a bit fishy that McLaren have come up with a fast car this year. But Mike Coughlan came into possession of the documents in late March — long after this year’s McLaren was designed; even after it first raced. And it is not as if it is unusual for McLaren to design a fast car. Indeed, it has been overdue, as they have experienced an unprecedented drought of success in recent years.

You only need to take a glance at the Ferrari and the McLaren to appreciate that they are not similar cars. The joke normally goes that if you gave all of the F1 cars the same paint job you would be unable to tell them apart. But the chassis of the Ferrari and the McLaren are very noticeably different to each other. Seemingly, nothing on the inside of the cars has rung alarm bells either.

There is the possibility that some Ferrari information was used in the development of the car as the season has gone on. But McLaren’s incredibly open offer to hand its car over to the FIA for inspection shows just how confident Ron Dennis was that his team had not broken the rules. The fact that the FIA have seemingly found no evidence of copied Ferrari parts vindicates this. Ron Dennis is a meticulous and honest man, and McLaren’s record is about as unblemished as they come.

Furthermore, a careful reading of the saga as it has drawn out has revealed that McLaren was never going to be the team where the Ferrari documents would have come in handy anyway. The most likely scenario is that Stepney approached Coughlan with a view to creating a “dream team” of engineers who would approach Honda.

Stepney in particular, and presumably Coughlan as well, were disillusioned with their employers for whatever reason. In Honda they would have seen the perfect opportunity: a team with a big budget and in desperate need to extra engineering and technical expertise.

They were looking for a boost in pay and status, and saw Honda as their best option. The Ferrari documents merely formed part of their arsenal. Honda are in the clear though, as they did not hire Stepney or Coughlan.

And Stepney’s involvement is important. GrandPrix.com has suggested that McLaren may have argued in court that if McLaren are to receive a penalty because of Mike Coughlan’s actions, then Ferrari ought to receive a similar penalty for Nigel Stepney’s actions. Given the lack of evidence of McLaren actually benefiting from the documents, this seems like a sound argument to me.

Given all of this information, it would have been pretty difficult for the WMSC to justify any draconian punishment for McLaren. Yes, Ferrari are livid. But this is typical of Ferrari. It is tough to think of a year in the past decade or so where Ferrari have not resorted to the rulebooks and the courts in an attempt to win the championship.

I will pluck just a few examples from the top of my head. The illegal bargeboards at Sepang in 1999: cleared by FIArrari. The sudden appeal against Michelin tyres towards the end of 2003, despite the fact that they had been used for almost two years: upheld by FIArrari. Last year’s claim at Monza that during qualifying Massa was being “impeded” by a Renault that was half a kilometre further up the track: supported by FIArrari.

Usually Ferrari’s whining succeeds because the FIA are Ferrari lackeys. This is why Jean Todt’s claim that Ferrari would have been punished if they were in the same situation is so laughable.

This latest saga is yet another example of Ferrari trying to win the championship through the many grey areas of the rulebook rather than the grey surface of the race track. What a breath of fresh air for the FIA to go against Ferrari’s wishes. It further demonstrates how little evidence there must have been of McLaren wrongdoing.

It is also worth remembering that McLaren have not gone completely unpunished. The FIA will be keeping an eye on them for the next two years to check for an evidence of the Ferrari information being used by McLaren. If McLaren step out of line, they face immediate exclusion from the championship. This is surely a fair verdict. As Ron Dennis said yesterday, “the punishment fits the crime.”

Keith Collantine has come to a similar conclusion to me, and makes a number of interesting points.

Ferrari claimed that the verdict creates a damaging precedent. They’re wrong. Imagine if McLaren had been docked points, even banned from the championship, simply because Coughlan was found to have Ferrari documents in his possession, without having used them.

We would then have a scenario where any disgruntled employee could hold their team to ransom by claiming they possessed similar confidential documents about another team.

In all legal systems, there has to be a dividing line between the companies’ responsibility and the individual’s.

Now for a bit of tin foil hat stuff. Where has this all come from? Many observers have noted how difficult they found it to believe that such well-regarded figures as Nigel Stepney and Mike Coughlan would get involved in this kind of behaviour. Whatever their motives, there is little doubt that it has not paid off, as their reputations are in tatters and they both face lengthy bans from motorsport.

There is, indeed, a real whiff of fish around this entire saga. Sidepodcast outlined a number of the aspects that just didn’t add up. A good point is made about the whistleblower who contacted Ferrari, said to be a worker at a Woking photocopying shop:

here’s a challenge. pretend you’re the copier guy, try and call the Italian team, see how many hoops you have to jump through to get in touch with them. then see if they even respond, let alone believe what you’re claiming.

i’m damn sure if it were me the first call i’d make would be to the police…or failing that, the Daily Mirror. this guy could be worth a fortune now!

final point. where is this mysterious tipster and why isn’t he talking? what a great story he would have. the tabloids would love it, especially on the weekend of the British GP. we’re not getting half the story here.

Here is something else that has got me scratching my head. It is this month’s ‘Friction Circle’ column in F1 Racing, written by Peter Windsor. He is a bit of an FIA / Ferrari lackey, but he is also a wise man whose word and experience are surely to be trusted. Here is what he said:

…espionage is alive and well in F1 and has been for the past couple of decades. I’m not talking about ‘cloned’ cars such as the Benetton–Ligier or the current Newey or Honda chassis. I’m talking deliberate industrial espionage — and I speak from the experience of having worked in F1 teams for a total of eight years during that period. I saw it with my own eyes — the evidence of senior employees sending drawings to destinations that could only be described as arch-rivals. It was blatant, obvious, but the F1 world just seemed to take it for granted.

…

A big thank you, then, to Ferrari, McLaren and Honda — and especially to the FIA — for giving this most recent matter the publicity and sincerity it deserves.

Now this is surprising to me, because almost every other experienced observer that I have read has written about how unbelievable they found the entire situation. Yes, they say, spying is normal. Taking photographs of rival cars is standard practice. But industrial espionage on this scale? “I’m shocked, just shocked!”

So is Peter Windsor right? Is industrial espionage the norm in F1? If it is, why has nobody said anything about it before? Why hasn’t Peter Windsor himself ever said anything about it?

Assuming Peter Windsor is right, this just adds on another question to the never-ending list. Why have Stepney and Coughlan been singled out, while similar behaviour has been “taken for granted” in the past?

I put “race” in scare-quotes because it did not feel like much of a race, as a great deal of it was spent behind the safety car. Yet more of it was being spent by drivers being confused by the new safety car rules, and serving their penalties for it. And then there was Robert Kubica’s absolutely horrifying accident which took a lot of the attention away from the on-track action.

I was absolutely shocked when I saw Kubica’s car flying in the air before hitting a safety barrier, careering back onto the track in front of oncoming traffic, barrel-rolling a couple of times, then hitting a concrete wall before ending up on its side. I can’t recall seeing many worse accidents since I started watching F1 and it was sickening to view.

BlogF1 has a picture of Kubica’s car mid-accident — and that is before it hit the wall.

Although I am no medical expert, I was most concerned about the possibility of head injury or concussion as Kubica’s helmet bobbed around in that cockpit quite horrendously. It reminded me a little bit of Mika Häkkinen’s accident at Adelaide in 1995, although Häkkinen’s was much worse because it was just one, hard impact.

The fact that Kubica has apparently escaped with nothing more than a broken leg uninjured is a testament to the relative safety of F1 cars. But the shocking violence of his accident is a reminder of why safety is, rightly, such a major concern to F1.

Kubica’s accident brought about the second of four safety car periods. It was also the first outing of the safety car this year, which meant it was the first time the new rules got an airing. And boy, did it turn out to be a confusing situation.

The pitlane is now closed for a certain period once the safety car has been deployed. Two drivers — Alonso and Rosberg — were unfairly punished by this rule as they would have run out of fuel if they hadn’t pitted. They both had to serve 10 second stop–go penalties.

I cannot for the life of me understand why Mark Webber and Rubens Barrichello did not make their pitstops while the safety car was out. The only reason I can think was that they were banking on the safety car staying out longer so that they could conserve more fuel — but Webber obviously did not have much fuel left anyway, as he pitted as soon as the safety car period finished!

Finally, I do not like the rule about lapped cars being allowed to overtake the safety car after a certain period of time has elapsed. It is like Nascar’s “competition yellows” — contriving a race where there shouldn’t be one. As a result, the entire field of cars was covered by little more than thirty seconds at the chequered flag. It just doesn’t seem right.

Massa and Fisichella were both disqualified for making silly mistakes. The pitlane exit was closed as the queue behind the safety car was seemingly still on turn 2. Kubica saw the red light and waited patiently, but Massa and Fisichella made mistakes that earned them both disqualification. These are not new rules, so these experienced drivers really should have known better, particularly when Kubica has less than a season under his belt.

Hats off to Lewis Hamilton though. While he might not have had a lot of racing to do, he effectively had five race starts to lead away from. He carried them all off immaculately.

Hamilton is gaining a reputation for having a cool head while cars are flying off all around him. Today Alonso panicked at the start and tried to catch him on the outside. Alonso ended up braking way too late and running onto the grass. Hamilton, meanwhile, kept his head and stayed on the racing line as though he was driving a Scalextric car.

Alonso’s car must have been damaged, and he fell off the track a few times. But nothing must have beaten the embarrassment of being overtaken by Takuma Sato in the Super Aguri. I genuinely laughed out loud. I take back every negative thing I’ve ever said about Sato. That move made my day, particularly following the sombre note struck by Kubica’s accident.

Alonso had a torrid time, but Räikkönen’s race was equally awful. Seemingly, Räikkönen is not the driver we all thought he was. He had better shape up quickly, because the reputation he has built up over the past five years is diminishing like air rushing out of a balloon, complete with comedy “pffffrrrrttt” noise.

Someone else whose reputation has taken a bit of a battering so far this season is Ralf Schumacher. Apparently the sword of Damocles dangles above his head, but he scored a point today. Even though being overtaken by Sato was embarrassing, he can console himself with the fact that the same happened to double World Champion Alonso.

Meanwhile, the fact that Kovalainen managed to finish 4^th is proof that no matter how dreadful Friday and Saturday are, it is what happens on Sunday that matters. He started from the back of the grid, and while he was helped by the large number of retirements, eight cars were behind him — including some big names.

It is great to see Nick Heidfeld finishing 2^nd. The BMW was obviously quick, particularly one circuits with lots of straights like Circuit Gilles Villeneuve. Heidfeld is looking forward to Indianapolis next week and Monza, where BMW also excelled last year. BMW are probably not in much of a mood to celebrate, given Kubica’s accident.

It was also fantastic to see Alexander Wurz on the podium — with a broken rear wing, no less! The safety car periods allowed Wurz to cleverly save fuel and adopt a one-stop strategy. He was the only driver to do so. It was a risk that paid off big time.

The bottom line of the race

Hamilton was superb. While the hype surrounding him is often unbearable, there is no doubt that Lewis Hamilton is a highly exciting talent. Today he showed precisely why.

Ferrari must be really worried though. Most people thought that McLaren’s dominance at Monaco was a one-off. Apparently it wasn’t, and Ferrari must work out how to make up time quickly, before the Championship becomes a two-horse race between Alonso and Hamilton.

Hamilton has an eight point cushion over Alonso, and a fifteen point cushion over Massa! (A 21-point cushion over Räikkönen — but can he really be considered a title contender any more?)

Bring on Indy! But no scary accidents please.

Update: According to Pitpass, Kubica didn’t even break his leg and he will be released from hospital tomorrow. Incredible! Great news.