<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; magic-eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/tag/magic-eye/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s true &#8212; I&#8217;ve moved to the right</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/13/its-true-ive-moved-to-the-right/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/13/its-true-ive-moved-to-the-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic-eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical-illusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pastafarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbols]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/13/its-true-ive-moved-to-the-right/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is this spinning woman who is doing the rounds on the internet at the moment. Thinks she&#8217;s really clever by looking like she&#8217;s turning clockwise when she&#8217;s actually turning anti-clockwise, while in actual fact she was turning clockwise all along! And anti-clockwise. At the same time. Apparently, whether you perceive the woman to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is <a href="http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22556281-661,00.html">this spinning woman who is doing the rounds on the internet</a> at the moment. Thinks she&#8217;s really clever by looking like she&#8217;s turning clockwise when she&#8217;s actually turning anti-clockwise, while in actual fact she was turning clockwise all along! And anti-clockwise. At the same time.</p>
<p>Apparently, whether you perceive the woman to be turning clockwise or anti-clockwise tells you which side of your brain you use the most. Immediately it was obvious to me that the woman was turning clockwise. I felt a bit smug. After all, clockwise must be the side of the brain that makes me intelligent, witty, good looking and a mathematical genius.</p>
<p>Err.</p>
<blockquote><p>If clockwise, then you use more of the right side of the brain&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>RIGHT BRAIN FUNCTIONS</strong><br />
uses feeling<br />
&#8220;big picture&#8221; oriented<br />
imagination rules<br />
symbols and images<br />
present and future<br />
philosophy &#038; religion<br />
can &#8220;get it&#8221; (i.e. meaning)<br />
believes<br />
appreciates<br />
spatial perception<br />
knows object function<br />
fantasy based<br />
presents possibilities<br />
impetuous<br />
risk taking</p></blockquote>
<p>Are they calling me a girl or something?</p>
<p>Seriously. Looking at the lists, I would have always guessed that I would have been the left side of the brain. Not that I wish to blow my own trumpet, but I always consider myself to use logic, have attention to detail, reasonably good numerical skills and reality based. I am far to strategic for my own good, in the sense that I always spend so long thinking about things that I miss the boat.</p>
<p>Not that the skills for the right side of the brain are that bad. But I just don&#8217;t see it. I have less spatial awareness than Stevie Wonder, a dire imagination and I&#8217;m apathetic about symbolism. I am only religious in the sense that I am a <a href="http://www.venganza.org/">Pastafarian</a>. As for risk-taking, I can&#8217;t climb a ladder without completely crapping myself beforehand.</p>
<p>As if to compound the matter, the the article states that most people see the woman turning anti-clockwise. Brilliant! Other people are mathematical genii. I do little more than believe.</p>
<p>I believe, and I also live in a fantasy land. So what if I believe that I am a left-brainer? Or is that just a fantasy? This was all getting a bit too much for me.</p>
<p>I struggled to comprehend the situation. When I first loaded the page it was patently obvious to me that the woman was turning clockwise &#8212; there were no two ways about it. But I knew that she could turn anti-clockwise as well. In order to regain a modicum of self esteem, I strained my hardest to get the woman to turn anti-clockwise. It&#8217;s Magic Eye for the noughties.</p>
<p>And blow me down. It worked! It happened when I began to lose my focus while staring at her neck. I started to feel a little bit sick. It&#8217;s quite earth-shattering to see someone who has only ever turned clockwise suddenly decide to turn anti-clockwise. What&#8217;s more, I was now just as adamant that the woman could only possibly ever turn anti-clockwise, and surely never clockwise.</p>
<p>But soon enough I was able to switch between clockwise woman and anti-clockwise woman at will, as though I was flicking between The God Channel and BBC Four. My tip: look at the shadow that the sticky-out foot makes on the floor.</p>
<p>Now I feel much better. I can switch between clockwise and anti-clockwise at will. This must mean that I am brilliant at everything.</p>
<p>Also: Hehehehe. Boobs.</p>
<p>Seriously though. Does the illusion fail to work if it is a boobless man? What about that funny pose she is pulling? She doesn&#8217;t know if she&#8217;s slipping on a banana or if she is a little teapot, short and stout.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flashboy.org/blog/?p=245">Flashboy was similarly freaked out by the strange levitating woman</a>.</p>
<p>Aaaannyway. How did they decide that clockwise equals the right side and vice-versa? I have not seen any solid science on this &#8212; just a crappy Digg-magnetic article on an Australian newspaper. Part of me suspects that this article either</p>
<ol type="a">
<li>Is a pile of horseshit</li>
<li>Got the lists for the left and right sides of the brain the wrong way round</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ll have my eye on <a href="http://badscience.net/">Ben Goldacre&#8217;s blog</a> for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/13/its-true-ive-moved-to-the-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And we interrupt this report to bring you a sneeze</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/21/and-we-interrupt-this-report-to-bring-you-a-sneeze/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/21/and-we-interrupt-this-report-to-bring-you-a-sneeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC News 24]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben-brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emily-maitlis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[have-i-got-news-for-you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james-rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic-eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/21/and-we-interrupt-this-report-to-bring-you-a-sneeze/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#8217;t like to criticise newsreaders too harshly. I imagine their job is pretty difficult, particularly on the rolling news channels where there must be a lot to keep on top of. Lots of people seem to bemoan the fact that newsreaders supposedly have an easy job because it consists merely of &#8220;reading the autocue&#8221;. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t like to criticise newsreaders too harshly. I imagine their job is pretty difficult, particularly on the rolling news channels where there must be a lot to keep on top of. Lots of people seem to bemoan the fact that newsreaders supposedly have an easy job because it consists merely of &#8220;reading the autocue&#8221;. As if that would be easy. Have they not seen recent series of &#8216;Have I Got News For You&#8217;? (Well, I haven&#8217;t, because it&#8217;s shit, but that&#8217;s not the point.)</p>
<p>But the news channels have recently become pretty unwatchable in the evening. Whenever I tune into News 24&#8242;s hyped-up star lineup of Emily Maitlis and Ben Brown it seems awfully uncomfortable. There seem to be awkward pauses, stilted banter and <a href="http://www.artsigloo.co.uk/mtn/2006/04/we-hope-that-this-new-occasional.html">duff links</a> all over the shop. Last week I saw Ben Brown interrupt himself when he was reading the autocue: &#8220;&#8211; as my colleage just has a sneeze there&#8230;&#8221; I&#8217;m sure Emily Maitlis was delighted that he pointed it out!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that Ben Brown has had enough of getting shot at in warzones, but he never looks quite at home when he&#8217;s sitting at the desk. He always has an expression on his face like a sullen schoolboy, still in the huff having just returned from standing in the corner. I bet his shirt isn&#8217;t tucked in underneath the desk.</p>
<p>At the same time on the other side, though, it&#8217;s so much worse. Sky News&#8217; James uhhh Rubin is really errr quite uhhh wooden a-a-nd uhhh&#8230; hesitant. But I guess you should expect some of that as he&#8217;s not had much experience as a television presenter (makes him an odd person for Sky News to employ as a prime time news presenter though). Mind you, he certainly seems to know his stuff.</p>
<p>Rubin never seems startled &#8212; he never looks like a &#8216;rabbit caught in the headlights&#8217; as some newsreaders do from time to time. Instead, he just stares. And stares and stares and stares. I think he&#8217;s actually trying to solve a Magic Eye puzzle.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tvnewsroom.co.uk/viewpictures.php?gallery=jamesrubin"><img src="http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/images/jamesrubin.jpg" alt="James Rubin" /></a><br />
&#8220;I think I can see a pyramid!&#8221;</p>
<p><i>(<a href="http://www.tvnewsroom.co.uk/viewpictures.php?gallery=jamesrubin">Image nicked from TV Newsroom</a>.)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/21/and-we-interrupt-this-report-to-bring-you-a-sneeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

