Archive: London bombings

According to The Guardian.

And now also the BBC.

So he was just an Asian guy with a jacket on then? (Update: Now it turns out he wasn’t even Asian, but Brazilian.)

It’s possibly best to wait and see what further news there is until commenting properly though.

Update: Nosemonkey posts on this aswell.

Update: And perfect.co.uk.

Update: A Big Stick and a Small Carrot. Given that the police haven’t shot any terrorists or bombers yet, I wonder if they’re going to apologise…

Update: Blood and Treasure:

From the FT:

Police have been given secret new shoot-to-kill guidelines in recent weeks, it emerged on Friday after officers shot a man dead on an Underground train at Stockwell, south London…

…Now it was obviously pretty stupid to run away when challenged by a bunch of jumpy, armed cops. But let’s get this straight. The man was pushed to the floor and given five in the head. If he’d known that a shoot to kill policy was in operation then it’s a good deal likely he’d have been less stupid in the first place. This should have been made public.

A very interesting poll about issues related to the London bombings. (Via.)

Nosemonkey on the Vauxhall incident and citizen journalism.

BANG

BANG

BANG

BANG

BANG

If the reports are true then I think this is quite a lot, especially considering the guy was apparently already on the floor. My initial thought train went something like this:

“Holy shit they shot a suspected terrorist… But couldn’t they have just arrested him? If the bomb was on a timer it would go off anyway. And shooting the guy is fine if they think it’s the only option, but five times? And isn’t shooting at a guy with explosives a bit dangerous anyway?”

But I don’t know anything, and this might be very premature of me. I suppose you should reserve final judgement until we know the full facts. For the moment I guess we have to be thankful that more people weren’t hurt.

Interesting discussion at Shot by both sides.

Hmm, and according to Sky News,

Initial examinations though, said [Sky correspondent Martin] Brunt, did not discover any explosives on the suspect.

Update: The Yorkshire Ranter has a plausible theory as to why there were five shots.

Revised Traffic Lights of Doom — in order to “take into account the lameness of this latest attack.” (Via.)