Archive: driving

Ryan has a query about 20mph zones. Apparently “the use of 20mph repeater signs within the area is not allowed under the signing regulations.” What is that all about?

I’m taking driving lessons at the moment, and one of my biggest problems is working out whether the speed limit is 20mph or 30mph. Even if you can’t see any signs you can usually tell if the limit is 30mph by the fact that it is a built-up area.

But 20mph zones? The only clue I have is that it is always a 20mph limit around schools — but apparently this is a Fife thing and not necessarily across the whole country. And that information is useless if you don’t know there’s a school in the area. Another clue should be the presence of lots of speed bumps, but there is at least one 30mph zone in Kirkcaldy with plenty of speed bumps and chicanes.

MSPs set to raise legal age for buying cigarettes to 18.

Hmm. I’m not at all sure about this. Sixteen-year-olds are smart enough to know that cigarettes are bad for you. And obviously this legislation would hardly stop under-18s — or under-16s for that matter — getting cigarettes.

This sort of age is very confusing for knowing where you stand in the grand scheme of things. At the age of 16 you can get married, but you can’t have a pint, you can’t drive a car and you can’t vote. And who decided that 17-year-olds should be allowed to drive — did they pull that number out of a hat?

I’m not a fan of age restrictions in general really. Take driving for instance. I don’t think accidents are caused by under-25s more per se. But that’s kind of beside the point. If a driver is so bad, they shouldn’t be on the road, whether they are 17, 35, 75 or 14.

16-year-olds aren’t kids. If they’re going to drink and smoke — and they are — then why not? Their bodies are more than likely as developed as any adult’s. They are old enough and educated enough to know about the risks involved. A little law is hardly going to stop them anyway.