<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; blogfocus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/tag/blogfocus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I am so great being modest</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/31/i-am-so-great-being-modest/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/31/i-am-so-great-being-modest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogfocus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britblog Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Formula 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Roundup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/31/i-am-so-great-being-modest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this week&#8217;s Scottish Roundup, Will P wrote: Duncan&#8230; is still too modest (frustratingly so) to nominate his own posts when someone else is fronting the Roundup&#8230; While I would like to boast about how awesome I am because of my modesty, the truth is that I never nominate any of my own posts for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://scottishroundup.co.uk/2007/07/29/extremism-suspension-and-resignation-oh-my/">this week&#8217;s Scottish Roundup</a>, <a href="http://macnumpty.blogspot.com/">Will P</a> wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Duncan&#8230; is still too modest (frustratingly so) to nominate his own posts when someone else is fronting the Roundup&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>While I would like to boast about how awesome I am because of my modesty, the truth is that I never nominate any of my own posts for two reasons.</p>
<p>The first reason is just because of the way I nominate posts in general. During the week I read blogs using Google Reader, and I use the star feature to store posts that catch my eye. At the end of the week, I collect them all up and write the roundup or send my suggestions from there.</p>
<p>But because I do not subscribe to my blog&#8217;s feed, none of my own posts get starred. Besides, which posts of my own would I star? Which leads on to my next point.</p>
<p>I can never tell whether one of my own posts is going to be good. I have had my fingers burnt too often, writing what I thought would be awesomely popular crowd-pleasing posts only for many to sink like a brick in a pond.</p>
<p>This week, for instance, one of my posts has featured in the <a href="http://liberalengland.blogspot.com/2007/07/britblog-roundup-128.html">Britblog Roundup</a> &#8212; for the first time in ages. When I saw this week&#8217;s Britblog Roundup appear on my <a href="http://technorati.com/blogs/doctorvee.co.uk?reactions">Technorati watchlist</a>, I thought I had a pretty good idea which post had made it.</p>
<p>I was certain that the featured post would be <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/25/the-bbc-covers-its-own-scandals-its-rivals-cover-their-tracks/">the one about the BBC</a>. I was surprised to find out that it was actually the <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/28/why-yesterdays-verdict-is-good-for-f1/">post about F1&#8242;s espionage malarkey</a>. It also made <a href="http://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2007/07/blogfocus-saturday-you-want-exotic.html">James Higham&#8217;s excellent Blogfocus</a>.</p>
<p>And there was me thinking that everybody just skipped the F1 posts! Goes to show what I know. And that&#8217;s the reason why I don&#8217;t nominate my own posts.</p>
<p>On a slightly related note, I am planning on resurrecting the &#8216;best of&#8217; page. The page (which <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/the-best-of/">still exists in its old form here</a>) always looked like a load of self-congratulatory wank, which is why I stopped updating it a year ago.</p>
<p>But those people that go around giving people tips on how to make loads of money by sitting on your arse blogging say it&#8217;s a good idea to draw attention to some of your older posts. Makes sense I guess, particularly since I often do not have the energy to blog as much as I used to.</p>
<p>These things take time though, as I will now have to try and remember or otherwise find out which of my posts have made it onto Britblog, Blogfocus and the like in the past year. But when I&#8217;m finished it will either appear in the sidebar or as a link at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/31/i-am-so-great-being-modest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

