Archive: bafta

ITV showed that when it mattered, they could cover an unfolding event properly. Even though it was a low point for Formula 1, the 2005 United States Grand Prix was a high point for ITV’s coverage. When it became clear that there was a chance that the race would go ahead without the Michelin runners, ITV ripped up the running order and covered the unfolding scenario almost as though it was a rolling news channel.

When the Michelin runners pulled in at the end of the formation lap, ITV could easily have chosen to dump the coverage. Apparently, some channels around the world did. But ITV, to their credit, stuck with the race which was in a prime-time slot, knowing that what was happening was a huge story for Formula 1. The coverage itself was superb, striking just the right balance and bringing across to the viewer just what a farce it had become.

As James Allen says:

Commentating on the ‘race’ was completely different from any other race, as the story was as much about how the situation had arisen, how the crowd was taking it and where the sport would go next as it was about race action.

And Ted Kravitz points out:

Open hostility amongst the teams, the drivers literally powerless, and us on ITV broadcasting a meaningless race with six cars and ripping into the product we were meant to be promoting: a business that had forgotten it should be a sport.

That edition was nominated for a Bafta, but it didn’t win. Instead, ITV won Baftas for its coverage of the first race wins for Jenson Button and Lewis Hamilton. In both instances, the coverage was not particularly good for a host of reasons which I have outlined before.

ITV pulled off a master-stroke by selecting Martin Brundle has Murray Walker’s co-commentator. By all accounts, Brundle was a revelation as a television presenter, apparently leaving producers agog at his seemingly natural talent in front of the camera. It is all the more impressive when you consider the fact that Martin Brundle didn’t even want to be with ITV — he was still after a race seat!

Martin Brundle’s gridwalks have been one of the few must-see aspects of ITV’s pre-race coverage. However, over time it has become more and more farcical, as Brundle was increasingly asked by producers to interview irrelevant celebrities, and drivers continually give him the cold shoulder.

Mind you, the gridwalk has provided one of ITV’s finest comedy moments.

It wasn’t the only time a potty-mouthed driver let rip on live television. One of the most memorable was Mark Webber being interviewed after Sebastian Vettel crashed into him at Fuji last year. Live on British breakfast television, he explained, “It’s just kids. They do a good job, then they fuck it all up!”

And in Australia 2008, David Coulthard actually threatened to kick “three colours of shit out of the little bastard” Felipe Massa.

Meanwhile, Louise Goodman has said that this classic DC moment was her most memorable interview at ITV. Check out the professionalism of Jim Rosenthal!

In the background of that clip you can hear pundit Tony Jardine trying his hardest to stifle his laughter. The analyst was the only person other than Murray Walker to make the leap from the BBC to ITV in 1997, albeit in a different role (he was pitlane reporter at the Beeb). Tony Jardine remained with ITV until a few years ago. The decision to dispose of him in favour of Mark Blundell is one of the many questionable decisions that ITV have taken in recent years.

Simon Taylor used to work alongside Tony Jardine as pundit. He provided another comedy moment in 1997 when ITV inadvisedly presented the coverage for the Monaco Grand Prix from a yacht in the harbour. The boat bobbed up and down so much that Simon Taylor was unable to broadcast because he became seasick! I think a few viewers probably felt a bit seasick as well. ITV opted to present its Monaco coverage from a balcony in later years.

Simon Taylor was less engaging as a pundit and did not feature in ITV’s coverage for long. In fact, looking at the retrospective on ITV’s own website, it is as though Tony Jardine and Simon Taylor never existed.

All-in-all, I think the story of ITV’s coverage since 1997 is one that started off earnestly but dropped off over the years. The decision to hire experienced and respected analysts like Tony Jardine and Simon Taylor along with Murray Walker was the right move. It kept the F1 purists happy.

It certainly made up for the decision to employ Jim Rosenthal, someone who had no interest in F1 at the start, as the show’s anchor. I thought Jim Rosenthal did a very good job considering his inexperience of F1, and I think his understanding of the sport was very good by the time he left ITV-F1 a few years ago.

It was clear that ITV was proud that it had F1 coverage in 1997. I recall that in the run-up to their first race in Australia, ITV broadcast an entire evening of F1-based programming including a one-off chat show presented by Clive James and featuring several drivers, and a showing of the classic film Grand Prix.

And check out the original title sequence. It is dark, mysterious, and classy — a complete world away from the cheese-fest that ITV-F1 has become.

Looking at some of ITV’s programmes from the early years, which can be easily found on YouTube, the tone of the programme is surprisingly different. The pace is slower, as though the coverage is being given room to breathe — very different from the frenetic Hamilton worshipping of later years.

Over the years, the best aspects of ITV’s coverage were stripped away one-by-one. Murray Walker’s retirement was a big blow which I don’t think ITV ever quite recovered from. While in the early years ITV hauled a dedicated studio around the world to present its track-side coverage from, more recently the poor presenters have been left shouting above the noise of engines in the pitlane — completely pointless.

The decision along the line to ditch its respected analysts in favour of the more populist Mark Blundell was questionable. And the general focus on light features and Hamilton-hype in the later years left a sour taste.

Having said that, F1 coverage has undoubtedly come on leaps and bounds. Occasional technical features fronted by Martin Brundle were excellent. And it has to be said that the hour-long build up that ITV typically offered was a tremendous commitment, even if all too often the post-race analysis was hurriedly wrapped up if the race was longer than expected (i.e. any time it rained, or any grand prix shown in prime time).

And you have to feel sorry in a way for ITV. When they picked up the F1 rights in 1996, they will have been expecting F1 to be on the cusp of a Damon Hill era, thereby guaranteeing British bums on seats. Unfortunately, the Damon Hill era fizzled out even more quickly than it began, as Hill drove for the hopelessly uncompetitive Arrows team in 1997. Then ITV had to suffer the ignominy of covering the dull years of Schumacher dominance and Ferrari dirty scheming.

So it’s worth saying thank you to ITV and North One for the work they have put into bringing F1 to our homes for the past twelve seasons. We complained about the adverts and James Allen, but they also brought F1 coverage in the UK to a new level and the BBC have been given a tough act to follow.

ITV F1 have won their second Baftas in two years. For the many non-British readers of this blog, the Baftas are the most prestigious television awards in the country — our equivalent of the Emmys.

Can you guess which race they won it for?

*drum roll*

The Canadian Grand Prix

The most dire F1 broadcast of last year. The programme was so bad that ITV were inundated with complaints and even offered an “apology”, although it was more of a “lame excuse” if you ask me. Strangely, however, the apology has completely disappeared from the ITV-F1 website, Stalin-style. In its place is a mysterious article entitled ‘How BMW turned its form around’ that contains no text. Were ITV worried in case the Bafta academy saw it? (The original article lives on in the Web Archive.)

But F1 fans are not fools. We know a bad broadcast when we see one and we don’t have fish-like memories. Here is Keith Collantine’s post about it. You can also read mine.

Even if you are a Lewis Hamilton fan, ITV’s coverage of the Canadian Grand Prix was less than fitting of the Brit’s maiden win. The coverage was abruptly cut short immediately after the podium ceremony. There was no press conference and not even a sniff of analysis — just a rushed wrap-up.

Even James Allen’s usually awful commentary reached a pretty low nadir as he messed up Hamilton’s chequered flag moment. He started his “winning yelp” far too early which just made him sound a bit silly: “LEWIS HAMILTOOOOON……… … … … [checks watch]… … [reads newspaper] ……WIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNS!” (Check the audio here.)

Furthermore, no other Grand Prix last year was littered so much with adverts. 17 minutes and 15 seconds of race action was missed by British viewers because of ITV. That is over 16% of the race. It is also around three minutes more than even the next most advert-interrupted race. If this happened during a football match there would be nothing short of outrage, and you can bet your bottom dollar it wouldn’t win a Bafta.

ITV won a Bafta last year for its coverage of the 2006 Hungarian Grand Prix. This also “happened” to be another maiden win for a Brit, Jenson Button. But that was also if anything a sub-standard ITV broadcast as Martin Brundle, the only decent person on the ITV F1 team, was not present.

As with Craig from Craigblog, I am spotting a pattern here. No matter how bad their coverage is, ITV F1 will win a Bafta as long a Brit wins a Grand Prix for the first time. We all know that no matter how good their coverage was, ITV would not have won that Bafta unless Lewis Hamilton had won. In which case, the Bafta should go to Lewis Hamilton, not ITV / North One. And last year’s should be handed to Jenson Button.

Bafta are an absolute disgrace. If academy members had carried out even a cursory web search they would have found out that ITV’s coverage of the 2007 Canadian Grand Prix attracted several complaints. Moreover, they would have found out that the vast majority of F1 fans are less than enamoured about ITV’s approach towards F1.

I wrote about ITV winning their Bafta last year. Today, it is one of the most popular posts on the blog (908 visits in the last week alone, compared to 520 for the 2nd most popular post and 255 for the third most popular).

Let us not also forget that no less an authority than Ross Brawn has criticised ITV’s coverage of Formula 1. And I haven’t even touched on the overwhelming Hammy-hype. We F1 fans really have got a bum deal from ITV, and the fact that they are showered with praise in MSM backslapping events just rubs salt into the wound. It widens the ever-growing divide between we fans on the ground and our overlords in the mainstream media.

All I can say is, thank goodness F1 coverage is moving back to the BBC next year. I don’t think I can stand much more of this.

Now where’s the sick bucket?

Read more on this travesty at F1Fanatic.

I know, I know. I said I would not slag off the MSM in my next post. But here I am. Five is a nice round number, plus this post leads on quite nicely to the one I’ll post after this.

But the jaws of F1 fans up and down the country will have surely dropped after hearing the news that ITV’s coverage of last year’s Hungarian Grand Prix won the Bafta Television award for “Best Sport”. It really is a slap in the face for F1 fans. ITV’s coverage is almost universally derided, and not just because of the commercials (which are a necessary evil).

The pre-race coverage is an hour of pure garbage. As a matter of routine we have to put up with frivolous, cringeworthy features. Last week we had to endure cooking tips from Heikki Kovalainen. Past gems have included taking a trip to Jarno Trulli’s vineyard and going mountain biking with Alex Wurz.

That is not to mention the features about parties and fashion shows that are of dubious interest. We’ll have to be careful for those in particular this week, because it is the Monaco Grand Prix, the most pretentious glamorous of them all.

Most of F1 fans’ ire is directed towards main commentator James Allen, a rather inept replacement for the legendary Murray Walker. Granted, it is a tough gig. But it is difficult to think of another broadcaster who manages to put his foot in it quite so often.

James Allen sounds like a twelve year old who’s pretending to be a commentator. And his voice is still breaking. His use of colloquialisms is clunky to the point of embarrassment. It reached a new zenith at last year’s San Marino Grand Prix featuring a disastrous pitstop for Jenson Button where, in the words of James Allen, “Oh no! It’s all gone Pete Tong!” Even the ITV / North One producers must have found that embarrassing, because they edited those words out of repeat runs and replays.

James Allen’s lowest moment came when Kimi Räikkönen was battling with a flat-spotted tyre that would eventually fly off. Allen suggested that he should pit and collect a few safe points. But Räikkönen did what any racing driver worth his salt would do, and raced for the win. When the wheel finally flew off on the final lap, James Allen exclaimed — and these are his actual words — “See! I told ya!”

In short, he is an absolute stain on Formula 1. And despite the constant pleas of Formula 1 fans, ITV bosses simply refuse to listen to the chorus, and continue to employ this irritant as “the voice of F1″.

If you think I am talking about a few pockets of the internet that are critical of ITV’s F1 coverage, don’t be mistaken. Those who work in F1 are also shocked whenever they find themselves watching from home. Just a few weeks ago, former Ferrari strategist Ross Brawn derided ITV’s coverage:

“It’s definitely a new experience for me to watch it with a different perspective and also the quality of commentators on English TV,” Brawn told Autosport magazine.

“I sympathise with you – it’s a very frustrating business to watch F1 on British TV.

“We’re used to having all the data and all the split times and we can see the race developing. What’s clear when you watch it on the TV is that you don’t get that information.

“Our commentators don’t seem very good at conveying what is going on. It’s very frustrating to watch a race and not have that information which is available to everyone at the track. So condolences for that.”

He mentions no names, but it is clear that he is referring to ITV, because it is the only company that televises F1 races in Britain. And here we have Ross Brawn giving his condolences to British F1 fans for ITV’s shoddy coverage. And it isn’t even his fault! If only we heard such words from ITV themselves.

The never-ending disaster of ITV’s Formula 1 coverage doesn’t end there, as their pre- and post-race coverage is jingoistic in the extreme. That is part of what sickens me about Lewis Hamilton. In this country at least, most of the hype is down to the fact that he happens to be British. It is simply unbearable. I am half expecting to walk down the street one day and catch James Allen in a compromising situation with Lewis Hamilton in an alleyway.

At least Lewis Hamilton shows signs of talent. In previous years we had to witness ITV and the North One production team trying its best to whip up interest in the prospect of a Jenson Button win, even though the man patently couldn’t win a race in a month of Sundays. In fact, he couldn’t even win a race in four (lunar) months of Sundays, as when he finally won it came in his 113th race.

It was the coverage of this race that ITV won its Bafta for. But there was nothing unusual that ITV did during its coverage of the race. Remember that before Jenson Button won, it was just another race. And ITV approached it in its usual way. After the race there was a bit of “yay, Jenson won”. But the reality is that this was just another race, and the coverage was the usual ITV stuff.

So why did this race win the Bafta, and not any of the other seventeen races that took place last season? I think we all know the reason. It’s because it was won by Jenson Button. We all know that.

So what qualifies it for a Bafta award? ITV didn’t decide that Jenson Button should win the race. And it is not as if ITV had any competition either, as they have had exclusive rights to F1 coverage ever since 1997.

ITV do not even have control over what pictures they show during the race, as they are at the mercy of the world feed, which is controlled by FOM — a fact that ITV always makes great pains to point out whenever the director messes up. (I have plenty to say about FOM’s role in F1 television coverage, but that is not the point of this post.)

As such, I have to conclude that the Bafta award isn’t an award for television. It was an award for the fact that a Brit won the race. Utterly, utterly pathetic. Bafta should hang their heads in shame for awarding a supposedly prestigious accolade on such flimsy, nationalistic grounds.

And it is all the worse for the fact that we will probably have to endure the ITV team patting each other on the back for a job well done during the coverage of this week’s Monaco Grand Prix.

Here is an article on Pitpass on a similar issue. But the news gets worse. Steve Rider and Martin Brundle are nominated for awards in the Royal Television Society’s Sports Awards. This, I can live with. But be prepared for a punch in the stomach: James Allen has been nominated for best Sports Commentator. He is one of just three nominees!

It is genuinely depressing. With ITV’s dire F1 coverage winning awards, this will give ITV an excuse to carry on burying their head in the sand and ignore the constant pleas of Formula 1 fans who are, as I have outlined above, almost universal in their criticism of ITV.

Incidentally, I would have understood it if ITV had won the Bafta for the coverage of the 2005 United States Grand Prix. That was a genuinely unusual race. The bosses at ITV could have pulled the plug on the coverage. Commendably, they didn’t. But it was a dark day for F1, which was — unusually for ITV — intelligently covered.

The race was taken for what it was — a farce. ITV conveyed the disgust of the fans and discussed the implications of the events, effectively turning a dull race into an interesting radio programme. ITV did not seek to sensationalise it or pretend that it was something it wasn’t. They did something brave and different, and in my view they pulled it off.

ITV didn’t win the award in the end. There is a set of perverse incentives if ever there was one. Rewarded for patronising, jingoistic tripe; snubbed for intelligent coverage in difficult circumstances. No wonder the MSM is in the state that it is.

More F1 fans waiting to walk off a cliff rather than watching any more ITV

ITV1′s coverage of the 2005 United States Grand Prix — yes, that one — has been nominated for a Bafta! It’s true you know.

The idea seems strange at first. Are you sure they got the right race? Well, although the USGP may have marked a real low point for Formula 1, I think it was a high point of ITV’s coverage — for many reasons.

First of all, it was real evidence that ITV might be committed to F1 after all — they don’t always show it. In terms of viewing figures, the USGP is one of the highest of the year due to its prime-time slot here. Yet, despite the possibility of there being a complete non-race, ITV decided to stick with the race. Some channels didn’t, but ITV showed the whole farce live, with no attempt to pretend that we were going to be in for a great race.

And the thing is, once the race began, it wasn’t actually that boring. The commentators James Allen and Martin Brundle excelled themselves. Allen did make a slight blunder, I felt, when he tried to do his usual pre-race build up culminating in “Goooooooooo” or something similar. But the effect was to show the race up for its complete ridiculousness.

Hearing James Allen saying “Goooooooooo” as six cars gently sauntered their way down to the first corner, my brother and I couldn’t help but laugh. Why? Because we were embarassed by the fact that we were fans of a sport that every other soul on the world tells us is boring — and the powers that be gave them the perfect stick to beat us with.

Allen and Brundle’s commentary was excellent. They struck the perfect tone. They were angry yet thoughtful, and managed to maintain a fascinating conversation about the whole debacle for over ninety minutes. The regular injections of Brundle’s usual dry humour were a help as well. Meanwhile, instead of speculating about fuel levels and pitstops, Ted Kravitz went into the crowd to sample the response.

The North One production team held their hands up and said, “Yeah, look, you got us. This is a disgrace. We think so too.” At the end of the coverage Jim Rosenthal described the response of the crowd as (quite rightly), “This show stinks.”

And it worked. I was hooked, and the programme picked up good ratings for ITV. They even showed the semi-regular mid-week late-night repeat in full (and I watched a lot of it).

ITV’s coverage of Formula 1 sometimes infuriates us all. But on the day that Formula 1 got it all wrong, I think ITV and the North One production team got it all right.