<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; ambient music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/tag/ambient-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gristleism: a different take on the Buddha Machine concept</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2010/03/16/gristleism-a-different-take-on-the-buddha-machine-concept/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2010/03/16/gristleism-a-different-take-on-the-buddha-machine-concept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Eno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddha Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buddha-machine-ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gristleism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Throbbing Gristle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=4057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written before about the Buddha Machine. It is like a mystical modern-day music box. I&#8217;m a big fan. The original was described by some as the anti-iPod. It looks like the sort of iPod knock-off that you might get free in a cereal packet. Instead of loading it with several gigabytes of your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written before about <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/09/fm3s-buddha-machine-cheap-but-awesome/">the Buddha Machine</a>. It is like a mystical modern-day music box. I&#8217;m a big fan.</p>
<p>The original was described by some as the anti-iPod. It looks like the sort of iPod knock-off that you might get free in a cereal packet. Instead of loading it with several gigabytes of your favourite music, the Buddha Machine comes pre-packaged with nine low-fi loops, which vaguely emanate from the fuzzy in-built speaker.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s marvellous. The Buddha Machine may look cheap and tacky, and the sound quality certainly is not great, but this all adds to the quaint and charming nature of the device.</p>
<p>It became a cult object. Brian Eno is said to have been so entranced that he bought eight of them on the spot. It was treated by some as a musical instrument in its own right. Artists created <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/">remix albums inspired by the Buddha Machine</a>. It even spawned a bizarre game, Buddha Boxing. Any resemblance to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpDZDi581qA">World Championship Stare-out</a> is purely coincidental.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY18ZPXVfyw"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HY18ZPXVfyw" /></object></p>
<p>The <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/04/16/buddha-machine-ii/">second version of the Buddha Machine</a> brought new loops, and the addition of a pitch-bending function, adding an extra dimension to the curious box of sounds. But it still retained its charm.</p>
<p>Now the idea has been developed further with Gristleism. It is a new variant on the Buddha Machine concept developed by the revered experimental group Throbbing Gristle.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="566" height="319" data="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000"><param name="flashvars" value="intl_lang=en-us&#038;photo_secret=a1794e7384&#038;photo_id=4077079367"></param><param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377"></param><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/video/stewart.swf?v=71377" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="intl_lang=en-us&#038;photo_secret=a1794e7384&#038;photo_id=4077079367" height="319" width="566"></embed></object></p>
<p>As you can see from the demonstration video, Throbbing Gristle&#8217;s take on the Buddha Machine is rather more brutal than FM3&#8242;s more relaxing version. And while the originals come in unassuming, antiquated, almost second-hand packaging, Gristleism has a very slick, modern and extravagant style to its packaging.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorvee/4420402437/"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4061/4420402437_9dbe5ca103.jpg" width="361" height="*" alt="Gristleism unpacked" class="picture" /></a> Gristleism is an altogether different product. But it chimes with the same ideas about what it means to buy music in a physical format in these days of digital downloads. Record companies are increasingly seeking to make the physical editions of albums more appealing by <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/19/the-future-of-music-pretty-boxes/">making the package more of the product</a>. The stylish packaging of Gristleism asks questions about music, just as the original Buddha Machines did.</p>
<p>Musically, Gristelism fulfils a completely different role. The originals, with the music composed by FM3, were more ambient in nature. They could sit happily in the corner, quietly emitting unobtrusive drones.</p>
<p>But as you would expect with Throbbing Gristle, things are a bit more madcap here. I have to admit that when I first started playing with this, I couldn&#8217;t stop grinning. I had to interact with the music. You can really utilise that pitch altering knob to great effect.</p>
<hr />
<div class="note">
<p><a href="http://gristleism.com/">Read more about Gristleism</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2010/03/16/gristleism-a-different-take-on-the-buddha-machine-concept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alarm will sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autechre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Björk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob-jaroc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island-records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jarvis Cocker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lfo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plaid & Bob Jaroc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheffield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve beckett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=3490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the fourth group Warp albums that I am looking at, celebrating 20 years of the seminal record label. To read the other parts of this series, check out the table of contents on the right. Pulp &#8212; Intro Surprised? Not many people know that Pulp were given a substantial leg-up by the people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='series_toc'><h3>Warp20</h3><p>A series of posts</p><ol><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/15/20-years-of-warp-records/' title='20 years of Warp Records'>20 years of Warp Records</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/18/20-warp-albums-part-1/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3</a></li><li>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4</li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/11/22/20-warp-albums-part-5/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/12/23/warp20-box-set/' title='Warp20 (Box Set)'>Warp20 (Box Set)</a></li></ol></div><p> <p>This is the fourth group Warp albums that I am looking at, celebrating 20 years of the seminal record label. To read the other parts of this series, check out the table of contents on the right.</p>
<h3>Pulp &#8212; Intro</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000007345?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B000007345"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41S1WHXVRHL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Intro cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B000007345" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Surprised? Not many people know that Pulp were given a substantial leg-up by the people behind Warp Records. In fairness, <i>Intro</i> technically isn&#8217;t a Warp album. It was released by Island, but is a compilation of the EPs and singles that were released on Gift Records, a spin-off of Warp.</p>
<p>Today, Warp would have no qualms about releasing music by a band like Pulp. But this was way back in 1992, before the &#8220;sacrilege&#8221; of releasing guitar bands was ever considered by Warp. It didn&#8217;t fit, but they wanted to help out their fellow Sheffielders.</p>
<p>Jarvis Cocker had already directed a couple of videos for Warp, and Pulp were stuck in a record deal that wouldn&#8217;t work for them. So Gift Records was set up to help Pulp on their way to becoming household names. Gift did release music by other indie bands, but none nearly as notable as Pulp. <a href="http://www.self-titledmag.com/home/2009/09/04/the-color-purple-from-aphex-twin-to-autechre-chris-cunningham-to-boards-of-canada-steve-beckett-gives-us-a-guide-to-warps-20-years/">In the words of Steve Beckett</a>, once Pulp signed to Island, &#8220;there really wasn’t any reason to keep [Gift] going.&#8221;</p>
<p><i>Intro</i> is of rather variable quality &#8212; not as good as their later albums, but clearly much more accomplished than their previous albums. Indeed, the reason the album was called <i>Intro</i> was to obfuscate the existence of the earlier material.</p>
<p>Signing Pulp was a masterstroke on the part of Warp. Given the band&#8217;s past record, as a patchy art school-style rock band which had been around for far too long without notable success, other record companies wouldn&#8217;t touch Pulp with a bargepole. But Warp / Gift caught them when they were on the upturn, ready to become one of the best bands of the 1990s.</p>
<p>While parts of <i>Intro</i> lack polish, it also contains some of the band&#8217;s strongest material including &#8216;Babies&#8217;, arguably their best song.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/8sJHEjq0XoI"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8sJHEjq0XoI" /></object></p>
<h3>Autechre &#8212; Confield</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00005AQB9?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00005AQB9"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41zhAMqjh3L._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Confield cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00005AQB9" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Electronic music peaked here. Everything since has been a disappointment. I think this album an extraordinary achievement.</p>
<p>In one sense, <i>Confield</i> may look like a natural progression of Autechre&#8217;s sound. They had spent the late 1990s gradually moving away from the ambient and more club-friendly sound of their early days, choosing to become increasingly esoteric and experimental. But even against that backdrop, <i>Confield</i> was a massive leap. It also stands out from their subsequent material, which has been slightly more accessible.</p>
<p>For this reason <i>Confield</i> was, and in many ways still is, a controversial album. When people talk about Warp artists being wilfully difficult, they probably have a album precisely like <i>Confield</i> in mind. I won&#8217;t pretend that I found this an easy album to get into. Anything but.</p>
<p>However, I am mighty glad I persevered with it. What at first sounds like an overly complex, jumbled mess eventually starts to make perfect sense after a few listens. Moreover, the music is so full of intricacy and detail, ensuring that the album is a fascinating listen. Even today I will spot new little details that I had never heard before.</p>
<p>Autechre&#8217;s music is highly unconventional, yet it somehow all makes perfect sense. For this reason, Autechre have probably done more than almost anything else to change the way I think about music.</p>
<p>At first glance, <i>Confield</i> is a very serious-sounding album; quite chin-strokey. The opening track &#8216;VI Scose Poise&#8217; is particularly detatched-sounding. But this album is not without its fun moments.</p>
<p>Autechre&#8217;s heavy hip-hop influence is fully in evidence in &#8216;Pen Expers&#8217;. This track which begins with a very dense rhythmic cacophony, which gradually &#8212; almost invisibly, as though it is the audio equivalent of a Magic Eye puzzle &#8212; makes way for an intense, triumphant melody.</p>
<p>My highlight, though, is &#8216;Cfern&#8217;. It sounds like a fantasy jazz piece from 200 years in the future. I think I particularly like this track because it almost sounds like it could be performed live. I was delighted to find out recently that the avant-garde ensemble Alarm Will Sound has recently released a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwSW7dVbjFM">live version of the piece</a>. It sounds absolutely remarkable. I have embedded the original version below.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRRul5WmQ5Y"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CRRul5WmQ5Y" /></object></p>
<h3>Plaid &#8212; Double Figure</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00005B76L?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00005B76L"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/516OfKDxyXL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Double Figure cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00005B76L" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />For me, Plaid have a tendency to be formulaic. That is not in the sense that their music is similar to other people&#8217;s, but that they seem to have a set template which they work around. They sort of get away with it though, because even though their music often sounds strangely similar to older tracks of theirs, it is still good.</p>
<p>But <i>Double Figure</i> doesn&#8217;t have that sense around it. I don&#8217;t think to myself, &#8220;hmm, I&#8217;ve heard <em>that</em> before.&#8221; In fairness, maybe it&#8217;s because this was the first Plaid album I bought.</p>
<p>But I continue to get immense pleasure from listening to it. It starts off with the poignant track &#8216;Eyen&#8217;, which is arguably their best (and was featured in the Warp20 compilation). It sets a high bar for the rest of the album to reach, but it manages it. Plaid&#8217;s style &#8212; ambient-techno with a rather natural, almost tropical vibe &#8212; is unique and engaging, and it has never sounded stronger than on <i>Double Figure</i>.</p>
<p>It was during this period that they began collaborating with visual artist Bob Jaroc, with whom they later made the DVD release <i>Greedy Baby</i>. This is the video for the <i>Double Figure</i> track &#8216;New Family&#8217;:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/VrVYzwXabAM"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VrVYzwXabAM" /></object></p>
<h3>LFO &#8212; Frequencies</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0000272KR?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B0000272KR"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31JMP5TBAZL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Frequencies cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B0000272KR" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />I am slightly too young to remember <i>Frequencies</i> and the hit single &#8216;LFO&#8217; when they were originally released. But it has gone down in history, and is frequently listed among the highlights of Warp&#8217;s 20 years, making it impossible for me to ignore.</p>
<p>Electronic music usually dates extraordinarily badly. But even though &#8216;LFO&#8217; was released in 1990, it is still immensely exciting to listen to today, as is the rest of the album. It&#8217;s great to think that, once upon a time, this sort of music could be a massive hit. When it reached number 12 in the UK singles chart, Steve Wright declared it to be &#8220;the worst record ever&#8221;.</p>
<p>In that case you might say, mission accomplished. But LFO&#8217;s Mark Bell, while not being particularly prolific under the LFO moniker (there have only been two LFO albums since <i>Frequencies</i>), has gone on to become a well-regarded producer, regularly working with Björk.</p>
<p><object width="371" height="282" ><param name="movie" value="http://warp.net/swf/warp_embed.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="file=http://warp.net/rss/rss.xml%3Fpl_type%3D5%26pl_id%3D415&#038;playerType=embed&#038;playlist=bottom&#038;fullscreen=true&#038;controlbar=over" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://warp.net/swf/warp_embed.swf" width="371" height="282" bgcolor="000000" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" FlashVars="file=http://warp.net/rss/rss.xml%3Fpl_type%3D5%26pl_id%3D415&#038;playerType=embed&#038;playlist=bottom&#038;fullscreen=true&#038;controlbar=over" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></p>
 <div class='series_links'>« <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3'>Previous in series</a> — <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/11/22/20-warp-albums-part-5/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5'>Next in series</a> »</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[!!!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aphex Twin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birmingham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Eno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john-stainer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Later with Jools Holland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthesisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tortoise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyondai-braxton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp20]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=3439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The third part of my five-part series looking at 20 interesting albums from the 20 year history of Warp Records. To read other parts of the series, please check the table of contents to the right. Battles &#8212; Mirrored Battles are redefining what rock music is. They are pushing the envelope in the same way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='series_toc'><h3>Warp20</h3><p>A series of posts</p><ol><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/15/20-years-of-warp-records/' title='20 years of Warp Records'>20 years of Warp Records</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/18/20-warp-albums-part-1/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2</a></li><li>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3</li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/11/22/20-warp-albums-part-5/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/12/23/warp20-box-set/' title='Warp20 (Box Set)'>Warp20 (Box Set)</a></li></ol></div><p> <p>The third part of my five-part series looking at 20 interesting albums from the 20 year history of Warp Records. To read other parts of the series, please check the table of contents to the right.</p>
<h3>Battles &#8212; Mirrored</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000OLHGBQ?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B000OLHGBQ"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51iMKrMLm3L._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Mirrored cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B000OLHGBQ" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Battles are redefining what rock music is. They are pushing the envelope in the same way bands like Tortoise were doing ten or twenty years ago. In fact, I see Battles as the successors to Tortoise at the forefront of mind-bending rock music, filling a gap which was left after Tortoise settled down.</p>
<p>The music on <i>Mirrored</i> is unlike almost anything you&#8217;ll hear anywhere else. But the studio output is not even the most impressive thing about Battles. By now all listeners to contemporary music are well used to the technical wizardry that can be found in almost any song.</p>
<p>The amazing thing about Battles, though, is the way they use technology to manipulate their performing in real time when they&#8217;re playing live (see, for instance, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bdUZDPRQMY">their performance of &#8216;Atlas&#8217; on <i>Later with Jools Holland</i></a>). Their performances are the greatest partnership of man and machine, with a dazzling array of black boxes and gizmos festooned with an army of cables. They have plenty of interesting and unique ways of making sounds.</p>
<p>It is as though they decided to make it all as difficult as possible. But the band is well capable. They are clearly performing on the edge &#8212; a small amount away from being a total disaster. But the talent &#8212; most notably the experimental maverick Tyondai Braxton, and the intricate and precise drummer John Stainer &#8212; is there to keep everything under control.</p>
<p>Strangely, the highlight of <i>Mirrored</i> is the one song they don&#8217;t seem to play live, &#8216;Rainbow&#8217;:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/RvUij2obFWs"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RvUij2obFWs" /></object></p>
<h3>Aphex Twin &#8212; Selected Ambient Works Volume II</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000024C6W?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B000024C6W"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41rrdb5iTJL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Selected Ambient Works Volume II cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B000024C6W" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Aphex Twin is probably the Warp artist who needs an introduction the least. Indeed, to an extent, he has defined the label. His first Warp album as Aphex Twin, <i>Selected Ambient Works II</i>, is probably his best.</p>
<p>It certainly stands out from the others in terms of style, with little emphasis on beats and little evidence of the humour that would be present in his later material. Mind you, some people may think he is pulling the listener&#8217;s leg with these long-winded and repetitive tracks. I have to confess that I found it a challenging listen at first.</p>
<p>But the fact is that these are beautiful pieces of music, both light and dark. The album is so strong that it probably defines the idea of what ambient music is as much as any Brian Eno album does. It certainly is not mere background music. The emotional intensity ensures that the music is engaging and stands the test of time.</p>
<p>The album is so long that not all of it fits on two CDs, meaning that only those who purchased the vinyl edition have the full version. The US version of the CD also lacks a further track, &#8216;Hankie&#8217;. Whoever owns the rights in the USA seemingly has YouTube under the thumb, so this is the one track that I can actually embed here.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/p1s2341qtE4"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p1s2341qtE4" /></object></p>
<h3>Plone &#8212; For Beginner Piano</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00001IVAI?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00001IVAI"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/3139GC95KPL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="For Beginner Piano cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00001IVAI" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />This is a strange one. At first I didn&#8217;t like it much, but after a while I began to appreciate its charm. There is a similarity with fellow Birmingham bands Pram and Broadcast, with its fixation on quaint and old-sounding synths and retro electronic music.</p>
<p><i>For Beginner Piano</i> has a bit of a Jekyll and Hyde thing about it. In parts, it has a particularly childlike vibe to it. But it is also quite a dark album, aided by the use of slightly creepy-sounding electronic effects. The mixture of childlike and dark is quite a disturbing juxtaposition which is probably what prevented me from taking it too seriously when I first heard it.</p>
<p>However, as time has gone on I have come to really appreciate it as a charming piece of electronic music. It is easy to see why it has become a cult favourite over the years, even providing the inspiration for the open-source Content Management System <a href="http://plone.org/">Plone</a>.</p>
<p>But while <i>For Beginner Piano</i> has become a fan favourite, Plone has also been at the centre of one of the most controversial points of Warp&#8217;s history. It is said that Warp refused to release Plone&#8217;s second album, with little in the way of explanation. Something purporting to be the lost Plone album has since been leaked. But Plone is no longer a going concern.</p>
<p>Here is one of the more childlike tracks, &#8216;Plock&#8217;:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/IlLzsF61n-8"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IlLzsF61n-8" /></object></p>
<h3>!!! &#8212; Louden Up Now</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00021Y98Q?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00021Y98Q"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AW7NV3GYL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Louden Up Now cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00021Y98Q" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Never let it be said that Warp is not a label that likes making things difficult. Here is a band with a name that is difficult to pronounce (though &#8216;chk chk chk&#8217; has become popular) and impossible to find in a record shop (in the A-Z, where does &#8216;!&#8217; go?). Yet despite this clear act of obfuscation, !!! are in fact one of the most musically accessible bands on the label.</p>
<p>The music is an infectious form of electronic funky rock, forging the sensibilities of punk and dance music. As an eight-piece band, !!! produce a very dense sound which fascinates.</p>
<p>Truth be told, I find much of !!!&#8217;s output only a little above average. But I have fallen in love with certain songs of theirs, most notably &#8216;Me and Giuliani Down by the School Yard (A True Story)&#8217;, a high-velocity, varied and downright fun piece of music:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaqQYetCH8U"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/yaqQYetCH8U" /></object></p>
 <div class='series_links'>« <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2'>Previous in series</a> — <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4'>Next in series</a> »</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1960s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew morton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aphex Twin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue-jam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bumps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hauntology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jazz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memoradelia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[princess diana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seefeel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoegaze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereolab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve beckett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tortoise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warp films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=3427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continuing my look at 20 Warp albums from Warp&#8217;s 20 years. For other articles in this series, please see the table of contents to the right. Albums are presented in randomised order. Broadcast &#8212; The Noise Made by People This was the first Warp album I ever bought, and it remains a favourite of mine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='series_toc'><h3>Warp20</h3><p>A series of posts</p><ol><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/15/20-years-of-warp-records/' title='20 years of Warp Records'>20 years of Warp Records</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/18/20-warp-albums-part-1/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1</a></li><li>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 2</li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/31/20-warp-albums-part-4/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 4</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/11/22/20-warp-albums-part-5/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5'>20 Warp albums &#8212; part 5</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/12/23/warp20-box-set/' title='Warp20 (Box Set)'>Warp20 (Box Set)</a></li></ol></div><p> <p>Continuing my look at 20 Warp albums from Warp&#8217;s 20 years. For other articles in this series, please see the table of contents to the right. Albums are presented in randomised order.</p>
<h3>Broadcast &#8212; The Noise Made by People</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00004NJMI?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00004NJMI"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51hXr%2BlSTpL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="The Noise Made by People cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00004NJMI" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />This was the first Warp album I ever bought, and it remains a favourite of mine to this day. Broadcast&#8217;s music is heavily steeped in 1960s influence, and comparisons with Stereolab are commonplace (and not inaccurate). But they sound anything but derivative.</p>
<p><i>The Noise Made by People</i> has a dark and slightly creepy aesthetic. Most of the album creeps along at a rather slow pace. Then there are Trish Keenan&#8217;s almost robotic vocals. The music itself &#8212; largely based on 1960s-style electronic instruments &#8212; could almost be transmitted directly from that decade, complete with unsettling background noise.</p>
<p>Put together, this all gives the music a rather otherworldly vibe. It is as though you are listening to a ghostly music that has been trapped in the airwaves since the 1960s and has only just escaped.</p>
<p>Funnily enough, the real life story of the recording of this album is similar to the picture I have just described. It is said that Broadcast struggled with the recording of the album, and it took three years to make. Perhaps this is another reason why it sounds clinical, though it&#8217;s all the more captivating for it.</p>
<p>Since <i>The Noise Made by People</i>, Broadcast have reduced in size to become just the core duo of Trish Keenan and James Cargill. In turn, the music has become less dense and more raw, and has lost the otherworldly qualities of their earlier material. Although Broadcast is still a good band, I feel that they were definitely at their peak with this album.</p>
<p>This video for &#8216;Come On Let&#8217;s Go&#8217; captures the aesthetic of the album really well:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zw5ztuhEat4"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zw5ztuhEat4" /></object></p>
<h3>Tortoise &#8212; Standards</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B000056BJL?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B000056BJL"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51Y0TJ6Q12L._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Standards cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B000056BJL" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Many feel that Tortoise were at their strongest in the 1990s. I did not discover them until 2001, so maybe I am biased in that sense. But I think that the band was at the height of its creative powers with <i>Standards</i>.</p>
<p>Quite simply, it was one of the most unique-sounding albums I had ever heard and remains one of my favourite listens to this day. The effortless fusion of punchy rock, cutting-edge electronic music, multi-layered drumming and jazz makes this an extraordinarily bold album that captivates you from start to finish.</p>
<p>If ever there was an album that was definitively not just &#8216;going through the motions&#8217;, it is surely <i>Standards</i> &#8212; despite its title. This record documents Tortoise standing on the very edge of what is possible with rock music. I find it impossible to become bored of this album. There is so much going on in so many layers.</p>
<p>Each instrument would be fascinating to listen to on its own (this was proved when the rhythm section of Tortoise released an album of drums and little else called <i>Bumps</i>). Each band member is doing his own thing. And yet, everything here makes a perfect fit.</p>
<p>Nothing Tortoise have produced since then has come close to reaching the standard of <i>Standards</i>. But then again, few albums by any bad do.</p>
<p>This is the video for the attention-grabbing album opener, &#8216;Seneca&#8217;:</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/0muak01p6k8"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0muak01p6k8" /></object></p>
<h3>Seefeel &#8211; Succour</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0000073OM?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B0000073OM"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31fUyXZ1JYL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Succour cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B0000073OM" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />I only discovered this album a few years ago &#8212; probably over a decade after it was originally released. But I am glad I opted to buy it. The music is from the place where ambient, shoegaze, indie and techno all converge. The allure of Seefeel comes from its mixture of ambient-style drones and textures, techno-influenced minimalist drums and guitars, and the dreamy, processed vocals of singer Sarah Peacock.</p>
<p>Although superficially it feels like a pure techno / IDM album, the use of guitars and live drums was unusual for a Warp release at that time. This is what led Steve Beckett to <a href="http://www.self-titledmag.com/home/2009/09/04/the-color-purple-from-aphex-twin-to-autechre-chris-cunningham-to-boards-of-canada-steve-beckett-gives-us-a-guide-to-warps-20-years/">recently single it out</a> as &#8220;the first sacreligious move&#8221;.</p>
<p>Musically, <i>Succour</i> is a fabulous success. But if you thought this was the evidence that guitars could happily sit in a techno environment, think again. Apparently due to Mark Clifford&#8217;s efforts to push the band in a more electronic direction, the old artistic differences emerged and the band only lasted a few years after the release of <i>Succour</i>.</p>
<p>In a way, I feel as though I have missed out by not experiencing this music when it was first released. It must have been so incredibly exciting, at the cutting edge, when it was released. It would be interesting to hear what this band would come up with today.</p>
<p>Incredibly, Seefeel have recently re-formed. Initially this was for a one-off gig as part of the Warp20 celebrations. But there are now hints that Seefeel have also been in the studio. I can&#8217;t wait to hear any results that might come out of this.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/zqCWksJQJrw"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zqCWksJQJrw" /></object></p>
<h3>Chris Morris &#8212; Blue Jam</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00004YL1M?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=doctorvee-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1634&#038;creative=19450&#038;creativeASIN=B00004YL1M"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/31WR3N07ENL._SL500_AA168_.jpg" alt="Blue Jam cover" class="picture" /></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.co.uk/e/ir?t=doctorvee-21&#038;l=as2&#038;o=2&#038;a=B00004YL1M" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />Chris Morris, as one of Britain&#8217;s most influential satirists, probably needs little introduction. But few may immediately associate him with Warp Records. But Warp has been the outlet for a lot of his material, including the CD releases of the radio series On the Hour and his Bafta-winning short film <i>My Wrongs #8245-8249 &#038; 117</i> among other bits and pieces. Warp Films is also backing his current project, <i>Four Lions</i>.</p>
<p>But his first CD on Warp was a compilation of sketches from his experimental radio programme, <i>Blue Jam</i> (which was later turned into the television series Jam). This was a dark comedy, equal parts disturbing and funny. Unusually, the sketches were surrounded by a constant backdrop of ambient music (much of which was originally released on Warp) from the likes of Aphex Twin. Perhaps even more unusually, the show was originally broadcast on Radio 1. It inhabited a late-night slot which fitted with the programme&#8217;s surreal, woozy and nightmarish style.</p>
<p>The series contained a mixture of music and comedy; of the surreal and the disturbing; of sketches and monologues. Most of it was a world away from his previous material, though from time to time Morris would drop in one of his infamous interviews. Here, he flummoxes posthumous Diana biographer Andrew Morton.</p>
<p><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:371px; height:304px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/VYo1SarWbPk"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VYo1SarWbPk" /></object></p>
 <div class='series_links'>« <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/18/20-warp-albums-part-1/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 1'>Previous in series</a> — <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/10/06/20-warp-albums-part-3/' title='20 Warp albums &#8212; part 3'>Next in series</a> »</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/09/19/20-warp-albums-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buddha Machine II</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/04/16/buddha-machine-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/04/16/buddha-machine-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddha Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buddha-machine-ii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago I wrote about the Buddha Machine, a charming little plastic box that emits ethereal music. It is an interesting object, mostly because the nine loops that it can play are so other-worldly and, despite their brevity, infinitely fascinating. Which is just as well, because they will repeat endlessly. Well, until you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorvee/3423949573/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3320/3423949573_b94efa0a39.jpg" alt="Buddha Machine II" /></a></div>
<p>A few years ago I wrote about the <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/09/fm3s-buddha-machine-cheap-but-awesome/">Buddha Machine</a>, a charming little plastic box that emits ethereal music. It is an interesting object, mostly because the nine loops that it can play are so other-worldly and, despite their brevity, infinitely fascinating. Which is just as well, because they will repeat endlessly. Well, until you switch it off or the batteries run out.</p>
<p>It was dubbed the anti-iPod, because despite the fact that it bears a similarity in design and concept to the famous Apple gadget, it in fact rejects the entire ethos of the slick iPod. The Buddha Machine reminds many of medium wave radios for the poor, crackly sound quality that comes out of its large circular speaker. And instead of boasting several gigabytes of storage space to put on whatever music you want, you are stuck with the nine loops. Essentially, it is what the iPod would be like if it was cheap and made in China. Instead of, er, expensive and made in China.</p>
<p><img src="http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/buddhamachine.jpg" alt="Buddha Machine II" title="buddhamachine" class="picture" /> My post about the Buddha Machine became a bit of a landmark for this blog, as <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/19/buddha-machine-on-radio-scotland/">I ended up speaking about it on Radio Scotland</a>. On the radio with me was a local Buddhist, who was understandably rather bemused about being asked about what she (politely) saw as a cheap piece of tat.</p>
<p>Ostensibly it <em>is</em> a piece of pure tat. It looks like the sort of thing that might plop through your letterbox a few weeks after you collect your twelfth Weetabix token. But there is something oddly engaging about the Buddha Machine.</p>
<p>It is an interesting statement about the position the entertainment industry finds itself in. This is an age when physical music formats seem more and more redundant. But contrary to this trend, the Buddha Machine &#8212; the ultimate physical format &#8212; has become a cult fetish object for music and gadget geeks.</p>
<p>Plus, you cannot help but be captivated by the music, which you can imagine being transmitted from outer space, or a hitherto undiscovered dimension. Or perhaps an anonymous exotic location on the other side of the world. Mind you, that last one is kind of true. The music, like the box, is made in China. You see, the Buddha Machine is the brainchild of the Beijing-based electronic music duo FM3.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorvee/3423950219/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/3423950219_df2d490405_m.jpg" alt="Buddha Machine vs Buddha Machine II" class="picture" width="196" height="*" /></a> Since then, FM3 have set to work on that difficult second Buddha Machine. I never suspected they would try to repeat the feat. Could it possibly recreate the magic of the original?</p>
<p>It is true that, unless you are new to the Buddha Machine, there is not much so mystery about the second iteration. To an extent, once you&#8217;ve seen one Buddha Machine, you&#8217;ve seen them all.</p>
<p>But there is enough that is new about the Buddha Machine II to justify the purchase. Of course, there are nine new loops. The music is as fascinating as ever, even if these new selections don&#8217;t quite seem to match the other-worldly qualities of the original loops. While the first Buddha Machine was based more on electronic sounds, a lot of the new music is more guitar-based &#8212; though it is still firmly of the ambient persuasion.</p>
<p>My personal favourite loop of Buddha Machine II is #3, &#8216;Piano&#8217;. It is a decisive but quizzical riff that, in a fairer world, could be the Windows startup sound.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorvee/3424758904/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3637/3424758904_2f59ee7ea8.jpg" alt="Buddha in box" /></a></div>
<p>Overall, Buddha Machine II feels like a more mature version of the original. Although the designs of the two machines are very similar, there are some subtle changes. The first Buddha Machine came in a variety of bright, almost childlike colours. The new version comes in deeper, more adult hues: burgundy, brown or &#8212; my choice &#8212; grey. Even the &#8220;summer edition&#8221; comes in a curious teal-like colour.</p>
<p>Buddha Machine II also comes with a new feature &#8212; a knob that allows you to control the pitch at which the loops play. At first, this new addition feels like a failure. Controlling it while the Buddha Machine is switched on produces a rather unpleasant, disorientating effect. It sounds like a malfunctioning tape player &#8212; a noise that made me feel sick when I was a child.</p>
<p>But a more careful use of the new control brings more pleasure. It unlocks infinite worlds hidden inside this tiny box. Instead of just the nine loops, for each one you now have a choice of a slow and low-pitched version, or a fast and high-pitched version &#8212; and everything in between. Each loop is now massively variable. Exploring different speeds of each loop reveals new elements, elicits new emotions and brings new experiences.</p>
<p>This will bring a new dimension to the past time of Buddha boxing. This is where two or more people experiment with a number of Buddha Machines, allowing the drones to weave themselves among one another. On first listen to such an experiment, the loops may seem to match up poorly. But it ends up being a fascinating ambient creation, like some massive imagined Brian Eno installation.</p>
<p>You can try it for yourself with the <a href="http://www.zendesk.com/external/wall/">Buddha Machine Wall</a>, a web page that lets you experiment using the original nine loops. FM3 themselves invite you <a href="http://www.fm3buddhamachine.com/site/?p=317">to play with three loops</a> from Buddha Machine II.</p>
<p>The Buddha Machine has come on a long way since its original release four years ago, having spawned a number of other projects. <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/">Robert Henke remixed</a> the Buddha Machine to create the album <i>Layering Buddha</i>. FM3 themselves encourage such remixing by offering MP3s of the loops to <a href="http://www.fm3buddhamachine.com/site/?page_id=29">download for free</a>, available under a Creative Commons license.</p>
<p>And despite originally being the anti-iPod, you can now buy an <a href="http://www.fm3buddhamachine.com/site/?p=312">iPhone app</a> that apes the original Buddha Machine. Of course, it doesn&#8217;t quite have the same charm as the real thing, but there is nonetheless something novel about these wonderful sounds coming out of your phone.</p>
<p>All-in-all, this unassuming little box packs a lot of punch. It is roughly the price of a CD album. But as an object, you will get far more pleasure out of a Buddha Machine.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.fm3buddhamachine.com/">Official Buddha Machine website</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.fm3.com.cn/">FM3 website</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/sashafrerejones/2009/01/omcom.html">A great blog post about the Buddha Machine</a> by <i>The New Yorker</i>&#8216;s Sasha Frere-Jones</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/04/16/buddha-machine-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autechre &#8212; Quaristice</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/11/autechre-quaristice/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/11/autechre-quaristice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autechre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/11/autechre-quaristice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have now had well over a month to digest the MP3s, and I have had the CD (and what a lovely object that is) for a week. High time for me to review Quaristice, Autechre&#8217;s first album for three years. Pinksy encouraged me to write a track-by-track review, but I will not do that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='series_toc'><h3>Quaristice</h3><p>A series of posts</p><ol><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/31/how-to-quadruple-the-price-of-an-album-and-get-away-with-it/' title='How to quadruple the price of an album and get away with it'>How to quadruple the price of an album and get away with it</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/08/how-not-to-review-music/' title='How not to review music'>How not to review music</a></li><li>Autechre &#8212; Quaristice</li></ol></div><p> <p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Quaristice-Autechre/dp/B0012S59ZA/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=music&#038;qid=1205189688&#038;sr=8-1"><img src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41-TrdIExBL._AA240_.jpg" alt="Quaristice artwork" class="picture" /></a> I have now had well over a month to digest the MP3s, and I have had the CD (and what a lovely object that is) for a week. High time for me to review <i>Quaristice</i>, Autechre&#8217;s first album for three years.</p>
<p><a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/31/how-to-quadruple-the-price-of-an-album-and-get-away-with-it/#comment-330529">Pinksy</a> <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/08/how-not-to-review-music/#comment-331694">encouraged</a> me to write a track-by-track review, but I will not do that in case I make an arse of myself like that other guy. That, and because I can&#8217;t think of enough things to say about each track. And I know nothing about electronic music production so I really would be making an arse of myself.</p>
<p>Anyway, onward!</p>
<p>The album starts off with a real surprise. &#8216;Altibzz&#8217; is perhaps Autechre&#8217;s most luscious track since the days of <i>Amber</i> or <i>Tri Repetae</i>. It is not often that Autechre stray into making these beatless soundscapes any more, but it is a real treat when they do.</p>
<p>Paradoxically, for what is perhaps Autechre&#8217;s most immediately accessible track in a long time, for this very reason it was disorientating to listen to for the first time. It is an unsettling beginning to the album, because it leaves no preparation for what is to follow, namely the kind of brain-rattling beat bombardment associated with their post-<i>LP5</i> work.</p>
<p>&#8216;Altibzz&#8217; is immediately followed by &#8216;The Plc&#8217;, a rather more dizzying track. It starts of with a kind of slippery-sounding beat, backed up with a dense synthy soundscape, like a darker &#8216;Altibzz&#8217;. The track progresses, in typical Autechre style, into something quite different yet the same. I love the vocals towards the end.</p>
<p>Autechre aficionados will immediately recognise some parts of <i>Quaristice</i> from the leaked recording of their 2005 gig in Glasgow as part of the <i>Untilted</i> tour. &#8216;IO&#8217; brings us the first recognisable moment. However, I find this version disappointingly superficial compared to the live one. This had a lot more power live.</p>
<p>The other recognisable moment is &#8216;chenc9&#8242;. For me, this track succeeds much more on the album. It is a real high point towards the end of the album &#8212; upbeat, accessible and danceable, but as uncompromisingly intricate as any Autechre track.</p>
<p>However, my favourite track from the album is &#8216;Simmm&#8217;. This is not one of Autechre&#8217;s most intricate tracks. It&#8217;s rather immediate actually, with a funky melody and a groovy array of electronic percussive sounds. Another top track is &#8216;Perlence&#8217;. It sounds like &#8216;Popcorn&#8217; by Hot Butter fucked with big time. Despite the &#8216;popcorn&#8217; connotations in the sounds in this track, it&#8217;s a great listen. I also absolutely love &#8216;fwzE&#8217;. It reminds me of &#8216;The Trees&#8217; but groovier.</p>
<p>A lot has been made about the immediacy of <i>Quaristice</i> in many of the reviews that I have read. I have to say that, in general, I did not feel this at all. I &#8220;got&#8221; <i>Untilted</i> straight away, and even <i>Draft 7.30</i> was more immediate for me.</p>
<p>But listening to <i>Quaristice</i> gave me that stereotypical reaction to new Autechre music. I didn&#8217;t know what to think, I couldn&#8217;t possibly take in what I had listened to. I was quite confused really. I suppose I fell into the trap of wanting to hear Autechre&#8217;s last album rather than anything new. I was really looking forward to an <i>Untilted II</i>, which of course isn&#8217;t really the point of Autechre.</p>
<p>The initial alienation I felt was particularly exacerbated by the fact that, to me, <i>Quaristice</i> doesn&#8217;t feel much like an album. It skips from styles and moods with seemingly little thought to the overall flow of the album. With the additional fact that these tracks are much shorter than those on your standard Autechre album (20 tracks around 3&#8211;4 minutes long as opposed to 9 tracks around 7&#8211;8 minutes long), I was reminded most of Gescom&#8217;s <i>MiniDisc</i>.</p>
<p>Perhaps the fact that the tracks are relatively short by Autechre&#8217;s standards is one reason why some people found this album accessible. I just didn&#8217;t get that easy door in. After <i>Untilted</i> I smugly believed that I had learned to &#8220;read&#8221; Autechre as much as I needed to. <i>Quaristice</i> has certainly put me in my place!</p>
<p>It is interesting to point out here that in one of their recent interviews (in <i>Wire</i> magazine, not available online), Autechre have explained that the idea of <i>Quaristice</i> is to get to the meat of the track straight away, without any of the &#8220;language lessons&#8221; as they called the build-up of the track. I understand exactly what they mean, but for me the build-up was a lot of the fun of Autechre, and that has been taken away here.</p>
<p>If <i>Quaristice</i> has an overall sound, I would have to say that I think this is Autechre&#8217;s darkest album to date. One track in <i>Untilted</i> made me feel uneasy &#8212; &#8216;Pro Radii&#8217;. My first impression of <i>Quaristice</i> was as though I was listening to &#8216;Pro Radii&#8217; for the first time, several times over.</p>
<p>A huge period of darkness comes towards the middle of the album. This period begins with &#8216;paralel Suns&#8217;, where, incidentally, the weaknesses of the MP3 format are shown up the most. This is followed by &#8216;Steels&#8217;, perhaps (along with &#8217;90101-5l-l&#8217;) the track that most reminds me of &#8216;Pro Radii&#8217;.</p>
<p>Next comes &#8216;Tankakern&#8217;, which at first I felt was reminiscent of &#8217;777&#8242;, one of my least favourite Autechre tracks. This, however, has been the typical Autechre grower. Now I think it approaches the brilliance of <i>Confield</i>, which I consider to be the pinnacle of electronic music. This track particularly reminds me of &#8216;Bine&#8217; from that excellent album. Bonus marks go to &#8216;Tankakern&#8217; for the inclusion of birdsong.</p>
<p>&#8216;rale&#8217; is where things start to become groovy again. A simple but addictively enjoyable beat accompanied by a rather immediate syncopated melody, though towards the end there are some rather unsettling sounds that remind me a bit of the creepy psuedo-subliminal messages in Boards of Canada&#8217;s <i>Music Has the Right to Children</i>.</p>
<p>We only truly emerge from the dark patch with &#8216;bnc Castl&#8217;. The track starts off ominously enough. But within seconds it becomes some madcap shiny, sparkly tune with tinsel flying all over the place. It sounds a bit like an ice cream van having a fight &#8212; a really rhythmic fight &#8212; with an ambulance.</p>
<p>It transpires that &#8216;bnc Castl&#8217; is only a surreal interlude, as it is followed by &#8216;Theswere&#8217;. This sounds like it actually could be from a horror film soundtrack, albeit one where the monster is a draining sink. To be honest, this track is a bit cheesy by Autechre&#8217;s standards.</p>
<p>&#8216;WNSN&#8217; is not so intimidating, although it still has a very other-worldly quality to it. This track is very reminiscent of <i>EP7</i>-era material, particularly &#8216;Zeiss Contarex&#8217;.</p>
<p>Towards the end of the album we see a return to the more ambient sound found at the beginning. However, these closing two tracks do not succeed as much as &#8216;Altibzz&#8217; for me. &#8216;Notwo&#8217; would be quite pleasant, but the melody seems a bit ham-fisted and it&#8217;s not the most polished-sounding of tracks. Perhaps that was the intention, but I&#8217;m afraid I don&#8217;t like it.</p>
<p>The final track, &#8216;Outh9X&#8217; is more like it, but not quite the triumphant climax it could have been. I know that Autechre are quite challenging, but even though initially many of their tracks sound very odd they tend to make most sense if you switch off your brain and just let it all wash over you; allow it to appeal on an innate, subconscious level.</p>
<p>This is not allowed to happen on &#8216;Outh9X&#8217;. I just don&#8217;t get the strange plinky-plonky melody that fades in and out towards the beginning and middle of this track. It seems completely out of place. It is quite off-putting and is enough to ruin the whole track for me.</p>
<p>Overall, I have to say that I find <i>Quaristice</i> to be quite an odd album. By any normal standards, it is brilliant. I don&#8217;t mean to come across as fanboyish (although I am a bit of an Autechre fanboy), but I can&#8217;t help thinking to myself, why is there no-one in the world who can hold a candle to Autechre? I mean really, why are they so good? There are plenty of imitators, and lots of people making music in the IDM tradition. But why are none of them anything like this good?</p>
<p>On the other hand, by Autechre&#8217;s standards, <i>Quaristice</i> is, for me, quite a weak album. It is probably their weakest since <i>Chiastic Slide</i>.</p>
<p>It is true, however, that Autechre material needs a very long time to be digested. The music grows on you and you are forever seeing the music in new and interesting lights. By the time Autechre&#8217;s tenth album comes out, I will be craving more material in the vein if <i>Quaristice</i>, just as I was hungry for more music in the style of <i>Untilted</i>.</p>
<p>Even so, I can&#8217;t help feeling that this is Autechre&#8217;s least ambitious offering for a very long time. For me, the interesting thing about <i>Quaristice</i> is that it covers <em>a lot</em> of old ground. There are elements here of almost all of their previous albums.</p>
<p>I should point out that I have read the interviews, and I am aware of the circumstances under which this album was recorded. Even so, on a purely sonic level &#8212; from what my ears feel &#8212; <i>Quaristice</i> is retreading a lot of old ground.</p>
<p>I suppose in a way it is a bit too simplistic to think of Autechre&#8217;s music as becoming increasingly complex over time. In their earliest albums, this is certainly true. But since <i>LP5</i> or <i>EP7</i> Autechre&#8217;s music, although changing in style and mood from album to album, has zipped around within the same boundaries as far as the intricacy of their music goes. Perhaps they always wanted to sound like this, but were limited by technology in the early 1990s.</p>
<p>Anyway, I do feel like a right Crispy Godber now because I have certainly analysed this too much. The best way to approach Autechre is not the chin-strokey way celebrating needless complexity. While it&#8217;s certainly interesting to consider, the real reason I like Autechre, as I suspect is the real reason why anyone likes any music &#8212; or anything, for that matter: instinct. As I said somewhere above, let it wash over you and it will make sense on an innate level anyway.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="280" height="141" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/WARPCDD333/128731/maxi/ffffff/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<p>I will return to <i>Quaristice</i> soon with a review of the limited edition second CD, <i>Quaristice (Versions)</i>.</p>
 <div class='series_links'>« <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/08/how-not-to-review-music/' title='How not to review music'>Previous in series</a> —  »</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/03/11/autechre-quaristice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music not of 2007: three reissues</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/23/music-not-of-2007-three-reissues/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/23/music-not-of-2007-three-reissues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seefeel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoegaze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white-noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/23/music-not-of-2007-three-reissues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, last year I looked at some reissues as well, so I thought I&#8217;d do that this year as well. I wasn&#8217;t joking when I said I might not get this list finished until February. This is in alphabetical order. Seefeel &#8212; Quique (Redux Edition) This is nice. This forgotten shoegaze / techno crossover classic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='series_toc'><h3>Music of 2007</h3><p>A series of posts</p><ol><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/04/what-i-listened-to-in-2007/' title='What I listened to in 2007'>What I listened to in 2007</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/07/music-of-2007-40-21/' title='Music of 2007: #40–#21'>Music of 2007: #40–#21</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/13/music-of-2007-20-11/' title='Music of 2007: #20–#11'>Music of 2007: #20–#11</a></li><li>Music not of 2007: three reissues</li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/01/music-of-2007-10-4/' title='Music of 2007: #10–#4'>Music of 2007: #10–#4</a></li><li><a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/02/music-of-2007-top-three/' title='Music of 2007: top three'>Music of 2007: top three</a></li></ol></div><p> <p>Well, last year I looked at some reissues as well, so I thought I&#8217;d do that this year as well. I wasn&#8217;t joking when I said I might not get this list finished until February. This is in alphabetical order.</p>
<h3>Seefeel &#8212; Quique (Redux Edition)</h3>
<p>This is nice. This forgotten shoegaze / techno crossover classic got a re-release for seemingly no particular reason. Not even an anniversary. If they&#8217;d waited until 2008 they could have done it for the fifteenth anniversary. I guess that for whatever reason they felt like the time was right to reissue it last year.</p>
<p>Scottish readers may be wondering, and I can confirm &#8212; this album&#8217;s title rhymes with &#8216;keech&#8217;. But the music itself is anything but.</p>
<p>This &#8216;redux&#8217; edition comes with a full second CD of lost extra goodies. Tracks that inexplicably never made an album as well as alternate versions and remixes come included. My particular favourite &#8212; of both discs &#8212; is &#8216;Clique&#8217;. Why did this not make the album? It should have been a single!</p>
<p><i>Quique</i> has a gentle ambient approach, like a wall or ocean of sound. I personally prefer the heavier, darker, more industrial sound of their follow-up, <i>Succour</i>. But <i>Quique</i> is nevertheless a fine album, and I&#8217;m happy to have picked up this double disc joy.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/PURE194DL/94463/midi/f8f8f8/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<h3>The Knife &#8212; Silent Shout (Deluxe Edition)</h3>
<p>I missed this one first time around. Wasn&#8217;t quite interested enough. But when it was re-released as a three disc package I went for it. Maybe I was right first time round.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s actually a fairly good album. There are some good tunes. But I was disappointed. Given the rave reviews the album got, I very much found it a damp squib. Good to listen to from time to time though.</p>
<p>Maybe part of the problem is that I already knew one of this album&#8217;s tracks quite well. For that reason it suffers from that problem where one song seems to tower over the rest of the album. Even knowledge of this problem hasn&#8217;t prevented me from feeling a bit disappointed though.</p>
<p>The new extra discs give me much the same feeling. One is a DVD of a concert performance (<i>An Audio Visual Experience</i>) and all of The Knife&#8217;s videos. The other is a CD with the audio of the concert performance.</p>
<p>On CD it sounds quite good. About the same standard of <i>Silent Shout</i>. But watch the DVD and it just looks a bit ridiculous. It is about as live as Princess Diana. The vocals seem to be live, but that other guy clearly doesn&#8217;t know what to do with himself. If somebody is making that music live, it certainly isn&#8217;t him.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to believe that waving a couple of ridiculous looking glowing sticks in a pseudo-rhythmic (and often <em>not even in sync with the music</em>) manner is making all of those sounds. But I get the feeling that that awesome instrument hasn&#8217;t been invented yet.</p>
<p>I know that live electronic music is a bit of a grey area. But seriously. I prefer the &#8220;look like you&#8217;re checking your email&#8221; approach. At least that is less pretentious.</p>
<p>I enjoyed the music videos though. I will probably check out some of their older stuff if I see it going cheap somewhere.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/BRILDB103/63378/midi/f8f8f8/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe><br />
<iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/BRILDB103DLX/105138/midi/f8f8f8/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></p>
<h3>White Noise &#8212; An Electric Storm (digitally remastered)</h3>
<p>Already this has become one of my favourite albums of electronic music. I am absolutely in awe of it. Having read about the techniques used to make it, and just the sheer fact that it was so visionary, I really think this ought to be more famous than it is.</p>
<p>I have already written <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/06/white-noise-an-electric-storm/">a suitably gushing review of it</a>. I had forgotten how long it was. All those words and not a single comment! Gah.</p>
<h3> </h3>
<p>That&#8217;s yer lot. Incidentally, I have been linking to my original impressions of the albums I have been listing in this series. But there was also a post where I wrote about 12 of them &#8212; a kind of mid-year roundup. If you are interested, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/02/my-ten-favourite-albums-of-2007-so-far/">you can read it here</a>. You will notice that I was actually near enough on time with that one. Ironic really, given how busy I was at the time&#8230;</p>
 <div class='series_links'>« <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/13/music-of-2007-20-11/' title='Music of 2007: #20–#11'>Previous in series</a> — <a href='http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/02/01/music-of-2007-10-4/' title='Music of 2007: #10–#4'>Next in series</a> »</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/23/music-not-of-2007-three-reissues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A good start</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/20/a-good-start/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/20/a-good-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atheism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Geldof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Eno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david-bowie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[god]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirsty maccoll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nick clegg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pogues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop-music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Blair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/20/a-good-start/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my previous post I wondered if Nick Clegg would do much to enthuse me. Well, in my view he&#8217;s got off to a good start. He revealed on the radio that he doesn&#8217;t believe in God. What&#8217;s more, he seems to have a thoroughly sensible, tolerant approach to the whole religion issue. What a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/19/liberal-democrats-and-political-discourse/">my previous post</a> I wondered if Nick Clegg would do much to enthuse me. Well, in my view he&#8217;s got off to a good start.</p>
<p>He revealed on the radio that <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7151346.stm">he doesn&#8217;t believe in God</a>. What&#8217;s more, he seems to have a thoroughly sensible, tolerant approach to the whole religion issue.</p>
<p>What a refreshing thing to hear from a politician. It does often seem as though atheism or even agnosticism is one of the worst things a politician can be associated with among some circles. Tony Blair even seemed to think it was a liability to be the wrong <em>type</em> of Christian. C of E while PM, since resigning he has mysteriously become a Roman Catholic.</p>
<p><a href="http://paullinford.blogspot.com/2007/12/clegg-says-no-to-english-parliament-and.html">Paul Linford, for instance</a> has said that Clegg&#8217;s non-belief is &#8220;certainly concerning for me as a Christian&#8221; (<a href="http://www.bobpiper.co.uk/2007/12/god_botherers.php">via Bob Piper</a>). Never mind the millions of non-Christians in this country who have never seen a non-Christian PM! I wonder if he ever found Margaret Thatcher&#8217;s sex as concerning for him as a male.</p>
<p>In this supposedly tolerant society, I sometimes think we&#8217;d sooner see a three-legged Prime Minister than a non-church-goer &#8212; never mind a black or openly gay PM. I wonder how many leaders of the major parties historically have publicly stated that they don&#8217;t believe in God. I assume Nick Clegg must be among the first. Full credit to him for speaking the truth.</p>
<p>The second thing that has impressed me is the fact that he has <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&#038;grid=&#038;xml=/news/2007/12/19/nclegg519.xml">enlisted Brian Eno</a> to &#8220;reach out beyond the London beltway&#8221;. In particular, Eno is to advise the Lib Dems on how to appeal to young people.</p>
<p>This is good in two senses. Firstly, appealing to young people is good. One of the biggest crimes in the country today is to be a yoof, as you can see with the vilification of the hoodie, a convenient item of clothing.</p>
<p>Appealing to young people is a typical politician&#8217;s cliché. But this comes across to me as quite a serious attempt. Brian Eno is not some greasy pole-climbing politician looking to get good headlines in the <i>Daily Mail</i>.</p>
<p>The second sense in which is this good is&#8230; Brian Eno, man!</p>
<p>Brian Eno is 59, which has led some people to <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2007/12/19/uk-party-leader-hire.html">wonder if he is really the right person</a> to appeal to youth. I&#8217;m 21, which is pretty young, although I guess I am not like most yoofs. But I think Brian Eno is great. The person who (as legend has it) invented ambient music has got to be awesome, right?</p>
<p>He has created some of the greatest pieces of music of the past thirty or forty years. A lot of young people respect this. I know I certainly do. Okay, there are various U2-related crimes, but that&#8217;s a tough gig. I mean, talk about polishing a turd!</p>
<p>Brian Eno should be respected for actually engaging his brain (one). He is the only pop musician I can think of who doesn&#8217;t just dribble out ignorance every time he opines about a topic other than music. In a world teeming with preening pricks like Bob Geldof and Bono, Brian Eno is a real breath of fresh air.</p>
<p>And, unlike <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4564130.stm">Bob Geldof&#8217;s sojourn with the Conservatives</a> (presumably David Cameron has some really nice biscuits and a good belly-rubbing technique), Eno&#8217;s association with the Lib Dems is principled. Remember Eno&#8217;s website from a couple of years back, <a href="http://libdemthistime.com/index.php">Lib Dem This Time</a> (rather broken-looking now)? Eno is also <a href="http://www.makemyvotecount.org.uk/blog/archives/2007/12/eno_fans_rejoic.html">a long-standing supporter of electoral reform</a>.</p>
<p>One other thing, and it&#8217;s related to <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/19/liberal-democrats-and-political-discourse/">what I said yesterday</a>. It looks as though Nick Clegg has <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&#038;grid=&#038;xml=/news/2007/12/19/nclegg519.xml">raised a few eyebrows</a> by saying that he hasn&#8217;t heard of &#8216;Fairytale of New York&#8217; and by citing a non-existent album (&#8216;Changes&#8217; by David Bowie) as his favourite.</p>
<p>It does seem a bit odd. But what if the poor guy just doesn&#8217;t like pop music? I have written before that <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/04/16/whos-the-realest/">I don&#8217;t understand why we expect politicians to know these things</a>. Sure, most people keep tabs on pop music. But we are all different, and we all have different interests. Maybe Clegg&#8217;s &#8220;gaffes&#8221; are just down to the fact that he doesn&#8217;t waste time on trivia.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad I have ruled out becoming a politician in the future. If I did, I would no doubt be asked what my favourite film was. I&#8217;d have to answer, &#8220;I dunno, I don&#8217;t really watch films,&#8221; because I don&#8217;t really watch films. Then I&#8217;d be crucified by a media (and society?) that wants mine to be a mirror image of the median voter&#8217;s leisure tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/20/a-good-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FM3 &amp; Dou Wei &#8212; Hou Guan Yin</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/03/fm3-dou-wei-hou-guan-yin/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/03/fm3-dou-wei-hou-guan-yin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddha Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dou-wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/03/fm3-dou-wei-hou-guan-yin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year&#8217;s release of the Buddha Machine and the subsequent hype surrounding it brought to light the previously almost unheard-of Chinese electronic music scene. If FM3 are anything to go by, it&#8217;s surely one that more people need to keep an eye on. Hou Guan Yin demonstrates that FM3 can hold it together without a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hou-Guan-FM3-Dou-Wei/dp/B000H9I16O/ref=sr_11_1/202-4138721-8266254"><img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000H9I16O.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_V39278175_.jpg" alt="Hou Guan Yin artwork" class="picture" /></a> Last year&#8217;s release of the Buddha Machine and the subsequent hype surrounding it brought to light the previously almost unheard-of Chinese electronic music scene. If FM3 are anything to go by, it&#8217;s surely one that more people need to keep an eye on.</p>
<p><i>Hou Guan Yin</i> demonstrates that FM3 can hold it together without a gimmicky box to put their music in. Christiaan Virant and Zhang Jian teamed up with Chinese rock drummer Dou Wei to make this beautiful live recording.</p>
<p>In a way, the fact that it&#8217;s live is one of the most amazing things about this album. It is outrageously laid back and delicate. It sounds as though each little sound ought to have been obsessed over for hours on end.</p>
<p>The music is every bit as unobtrusive as the Buddha Machine, although it is not looping the same short section of music over and over again. Some of the album is pretty standard &#8212; albeit pleasant &#8212; ambient droning and bleeping. It all comes together, though, with the inclusion of Christiaan Virant&#8217;s loose guitar playing and Dou Wei&#8217;s restrained drumming. It sounds effortless and beautiful.</p>
<p>My personal favourite track is &#8216;å&#8217; (most of the tracks are untitled, but Gracenote and <a href="http://www.discogs.com/release/801329">Discogs</a> both bring up Chinese numbers for them all &#8212; this is track 10), where the gentle drumming and blissful guitar playing are delicately matched with some carefully selected vocal snippets. Just listen to it if you can; it&#8217;s a treat.</p>
<p>You had better read the <a href="http://www.lona-records.com/discography/locd12.html">description on the Lona Records website</a> which will bring you much more understanding of what&#8217;s going on in this album. I&#8217;ll just say that I think it sounds great and I&#8217;m certain that this will be a favourite CD for me to zone out to in times to come.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.fm3.com.cn/">FM3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.lona-records.com/">Lona Records</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=23921">Samples at Boomkat</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/03/fm3-dou-wei-hou-guan-yin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Henke &#8212; Layering Buddha</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ambient music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boards of Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddha Machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imbalance-computer-music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monolake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert-henke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world&#8217;s fascination with the cult music geek fetish object, the Buddha Machine by FM3, hasn&#8217;t quite gone away yet. The cheaply produced, but irresistibly quaint electronic music box is the source of the material used in the new album from Robert Henke (AKA Monolake), Layering Buddha. The concept perhaps seems a bit like Henke [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Layering-Buddha-Robert-Henke/dp/B000I6AFL0/sr=8-1/qid=1162385902/ref=sr_1_1/202-4138721-8266254?ie=UTF8&#038;s=music"><img src="http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000I6AFL0.01._SCMZZZZZZZ_V39661555_.jpg" alt="Layering Buddha artwork" class="picture" /></a> The world&#8217;s fascination with the cult music geek fetish object, the <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/09/fm3s-buddha-machine-cheap-but-awesome/">Buddha Machine</a> by FM3, hasn&#8217;t quite gone away yet. The cheaply produced, but irresistibly quaint electronic music box is the source of the material used in the new album from Robert Henke (AKA Monolake), <i>Layering Buddha</i>.</p>
<p>The concept perhaps seems a bit like Henke is bandwagon hopping. I have never bought any of Henke&#8217;s music until now. But maybe that&#8217;s just because I&#8217;m fickle. But the Buddha Machine is a genuinely interesting object, so I was bound to take notice of this exploration of the music locked inside it.</p>
<p>While the music emanating from the Buddha Machine itself cannot be altered, Henke has used high-quality equipment to record its output and deliver some radical reinterpretations. Essentially we have an hour-long remix of the Buddha Machine. It&#8217;s not bad to get an hour of music out of just a nine short loops, but Henke has done it.</p>
<p>Henke has stuck with the main principle of the Buddha Machine&#8217;s music though. In the best ambient tradition, this music doesn&#8217;t really go anywhere quickly. The tracks progress as they go along for sure, unlike the Buddha Machine which repeats the same section of music every dozen seconds or so.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.monolake.de/layeringbuddha.html">liner notes Henke writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The pieces as they live within my computer are set up as continuously permutating structures and theoretically could go on forever, just as the loops do within the buddha machines.</p>
<p>I made quite long renderings of these permutations and later decided which excerpt of each structure to put on this CD. Therefore, the tracks are not closed works, but views onto a perpetual machinery.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the basic idea is the same as the Buddha Machine, but it&#8217;s delivered on the conventional, linear CD format.</p>
<p>As for the music itself, it mostly sounds like your standard dark ambient fare. Some of it is downright creepy, at points reminding me of the darkest moments of legendary IDM spook-fest <i><a href="http://fredd-e.narfum.org/boc/comments/#geogaddi">Geogaddi</a></i>. If you woke up in the middle of the night and started playing <i>Layering Buddha</i> you would probably get a bit paranoid.</p>
<p>A lot of the music here is completely unrecognisable from the Buddha Machine itself, although a few tracks provide repeat glimpses of familiar elements. It&#8217;s interesting to see such radically different music being made from the sounds made by that innocent little plastic box.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.monolake.de/">Monolake / Imbalance Computer Music</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Robert+Henke">Robert Henke at Last.fm</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.boomkat.com/item.cfm?id=23926"><i>Layering Buddha</i> at Boomkat</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.fm3.com.cn/">FM3 / Buddha Machine</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/11/01/robert-henke-layering-buddha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

