<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>doctorvee &#187; Nostalgia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/category/entertainment/nostalgia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Seven&#160;songs</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/14/seven-songs/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/14/seven-songs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advisory circle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc-radiophonic-workshop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[breakcore]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cover]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[delia-derbyshire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[doctor-who]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronic-music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[focus group]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[four-tet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ghost box]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hauntology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jon brooks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[julian house]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[meme]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[memoradelia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[portishead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[public information films]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[remix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scott-walker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[television-presentation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[venetian-snares]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been freshly tagged in a meme by Chris. It&#8217;s a seven songs meme. Here are the instructions:
“List seven songs you are into right now. No matter what the genre, whether they have words, or even if they’re not any good, but they must be songs you’re really enjoying now, shaping your spring. Post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been freshly tagged in a meme <a href="http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/2008/06/11/seven-songs-and-a-bonus-track/">by Chris</a>. It&#8217;s a seven songs meme. Here are the instructions:</p>
<blockquote><p>“List seven songs you are into right now. No matter what the genre, whether they have words, or even if they’re not any good, but they must be songs you’re really enjoying now, shaping your spring. Post these instructions in your blog along with your 7 songs. Then tag 7 other people to see what they’re listening to.“</p></blockquote>
<p>First of all, I need to get this pedantry out of the way. If it doesn&#8217;t have words, <em>it isn&#8217;t a song</em>. Now on to my seven songs and / or other pieces of music.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve placed this &#8216;below the fold&#8217; because I&#8217;ve embedded YouTube videos and Bleep audio. Remember with the Bleep audio you need to press play again after it fades out every 30 seconds.</p>
<p><span id="more-2249"></span></p>
<ol type="1">
<li>
<h3>Portishead &#8212; The Rip</h3>
<p>As with Chris, Portishead&#8217;s <i>Third</i> is, for me, the album of the year so far. Eleven years on from their last album, it was all set up to be a massive disappointment. But <i>Third</i> has turned out to be a real treat. It is a solid progression on the Portishead sound (without all the now-clichéd-sounding scratching) with a darker, more electronic feel in general.</p>
<p>My favourite track is &#8216;The Rip&#8217;. When I first heard it I thought, this sounds like a Radiohead song. It sounds particularly like &#8216;Arpeggi/Weird Fishes&#8217; from Radiohead&#8217;s last album, with those guitar-based arpeggios. Sure enough, <a href="http://www.waste-central.com/video/video/show?id=2026864%3AVideo%3A227120">they have covered it</a>. Anyway, &#8216;The Rip&#8217; is just a beautiful song that builds up really nicely and is my favourite song from the album.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_fiMp3kC9-w&#038;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_fiMp3kC9-w&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></li>
<li>
<h3>The Focus Group &#8212; Hey Let Loose Your Love</h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.ghostbox.co.uk/">Ghost Box</a> record label has been my discovery of the summer. In fact, I am kicking myself for overlooking it in the first place, because I was well aware of its existence but I just never investigated it. But a recent edition of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/freakzone/">Stuart Maconie&#8217;s Freak Zone</a> podcast contained a Ghost Box showcase and I knew I couldn&#8217;t put it off any longer.</p>
<p>The label has a strong identity &#8212; both visual and audio &#8212; that is a slightly off take on nostalgia. The genre of electronic music is known as &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hauntology">hauntology</a>&#8216; or &#8216;memoradelia&#8217; (I think I prefer the latter, although the former seems to be more common). Think about the skewed, hazy nostalgia of Boards of Canada &#8212; deteriorated cassettes, faded photographs and so on &#8212; or Look Around You without the comedy and you will be getting there.</p>
<p>The Focus Group is a project of Julian House, famous for doing the artwork for Broadcast and Stereolab (he also co-runs and does all of the artwork for the Ghost Box label). His music has the same 1960s-influenced collage feel to it. This track is the title track and centrepiece of the <i>Hey Let Loose Your Love</i> mini-album. It&#8217;s the only release of The Focus Group that I have got my hands on so far, but I know I need to get more.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/GBX005/49324/midi/ffffff/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></li>
<li>
<h3>The Advisory Circle &#8212; Frozen Ponds PIF</h3>
<p>The other Ghost Box artist I&#8217;ve checked out so far is The Advisory Circle (who may be better known for his releases as King of Woolworths on Lo Recordings). The world of The Advisory Circle is a journey into a past dystopia where everyone is told what to do by the government through media such as public information films. The music also tinkers with ideas to do with television idents (a subject close to my heart as long-time readers will know) and suchlike.</p>
<p>I really like the idea of making music inspired by public information films. PIFs are strange things that have to perform two conflicting roles &#8212; telling you about the dangers in the world while simultaneously assuring you that everything is safe because the government is looking after you. It fits in neatly with the Ghost Box aesthetic of dark, uneasy nostalgia.</p>
<p>&#8216;Frozen Ponds PIF&#8217; is not necessarily representative of The Advisory Circle&#8217;s output. It&#8217;s the only track that really fully recreates a PIF as it might sound in real life (although even this track is not entirely faithful, coming with cartoony electronic &#8216;danger&#8217; sound in the middle). But it is perhaps for that reason that I like this track so much. That voice perfect recreates that paternal PIF narrator sound.</p>
<p>This track is &#8216;Frozen Ponds PIF&#8217;, although it&#8217;s been incorrectly labelled by Bleep as &#8216;Erosion Of Time&#8217;. Remember, mind how you go.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/GBX010/136574/midi/ffffff/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></li>
<li>
<h3>Venetian Snares &#8212; Banana Seat Girl</h3>
<p>I have no idea why, but this track is stuck in my head all the time just now. It took me a while &#8212; years, infact &#8212; to get into Venetian Snares, but now I am a hardened convert. Here is a madcap piece of cartoony, jazzy breakcore.</p>
<p><iframe name="bleepPlayer" id="bleepPlayer" width="341" height="73" src="http://www.bleep.com/player/?/ZIQ056/6786/midi/ffffff/000000/008c00" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></li>
<li>
<h3>Scott Walker &#8212; Angels of Ashes</h3>
<p>I got into Scott Walker when <i>The Drift</i> came out a couple of years ago. I thought it was a fascinating album, so I have been working my way backwards through his important albums. <i>Tilt</i> is excellent, one of the best albums I&#8217;ve ever heard. <i>Climate of Hunter</i>, it turns out, is not very good.</p>
<p>Most recently I have bought <i>Scott 4</i>. It is a quite exquisite album. There are lots of great songs, but &#8216;Angels of Ashes&#8217; stands out a bit more than the others for me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Scott+Walker/_/Angels+of+Ashes">&#8216;Angels of Ashes&#8217; at Last.fm</a></li>
<li>
<h3>Delia Derbyshire &#8212; Blue Veils &#038; Golden Sands</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve also recently bought the first two volumes of the series of CDs entitled <i>Doctor Who at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop</i>. I have very little interest in Doctor Who, but I have a great deal of interest in electronic music and the BBC Radiophonic Workshop.</p>
<p>Delia Derbyshire is rightly regarded as one of the pioneers of electronic music, having created one of the most famous pieces of electronic music in the world, the theme tune to Doctor Who. Apart from the theme tune, she didn&#8217;t do much music for the series though.</p>
<p>But included in volume 2 is &#8216;Blue Veils &#038; Golden Sands&#8217;. I already had this track on an earlier purchase, <i>Music from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop</i>, but its inclusion on the Doctor Who CD has reminded me of its eerie charms. A gentle gong-type sound begins this journey to an intriguing and exotic soundscape. A captivating piece of ambient music.</p>
<p><a href="http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&#038;friendID=74785863">&#8216;Blue Veils &#038; Golden Sands&#8217; at MySpace</a></li>
<li>
<h3>Sia &#8212; Breathe Me (Four Tet remix)</h3>
<p>Another (belated) recent purchase was Four Tet&#8217;s <i>Remixes</i> album. At first my favourite track on the album was the Beth Orton remix, but this remix of Sia has grown on me a lot. I have no idea who Sia even is, but this I like Four Tet&#8217;s interpretation whatever.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9ZTTmKe7Xek&#038;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9ZTTmKe7Xek&#038;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m not even sure I&#8217;ll come up with seven people to tag. Here goes. <a href="http://www.onebrow.co.uk/">Gordon</a>, <a href="http://www.onebrow.co.uk/">Laura</a>, <a href="http://calumleslie.blogspot.com/">Calum</a>, <a href="http://matgb.livejournal.com/">Mat</a>, <a href="http://www.pinksy.co.uk/">Pinksy</a>, <a href="http://ponzonha.es/">Ponzonha</a> (I&#8217;ll crack open the old Google Translator specially to read it since my Spanish isn&#8217;t up to much <img src='http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> ) and <a href="http://clairwil.blogspot.com/">Clairwil</a>.</p>
<p>By the way, I hate the number seven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/06/14/seven-songs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muxtape: playlist&#160;nostalgia</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/11/muxtape-playlist-nostalgia/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/11/muxtape-playlist-nostalgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[autechre]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[c90]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cassette]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cd-r]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john-cage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[last.fm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mixtape]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[muxtape]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By now you may have heard of a website called Muxtape. In a way, I&#8217;m surprised it hasn&#8217;t been shut down already. It&#8217;s probably the most blatantly illegal website since YouTube. Technically, I guess, you&#8217;re meant to own the copyright to everything you upload to the service. But of course that&#8217;s not what most people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now you may have heard of a website called <a href="http://muxtape.com/">Muxtape</a>. In a way, I&#8217;m surprised it hasn&#8217;t been shut down already. It&#8217;s probably the most blatantly illegal website since YouTube. Technically, I guess, you&#8217;re meant to own the copyright to everything you upload to the service. But of course that&#8217;s not what most people use it for.</p>
<p>Muxtape is an enticingly simple website that lets you make a little playlist of tunes, a bit like a mixtape. Webware jokes, <a href="http://www.webware.com/8301-1_109-9903479-2.html">as if you would remember mixtapes</a>! Meanwhile, <a href="http://mymediamusings.com/2008/04/03/muxtape-mixwit-and-tempting-riaa/">David Title ponders</a> if you have to be between the ages of 29-45 for the mixtape to mean anything to you!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 22 (almost typed 21 there&#8230; can&#8217;t bear the adulthood), and I love the romance of mixtapes. It is like instant nostalgia. Cassettes are meant to be naff, and they are to an extent. But holding a tape is quite special, like holding a past future in your hands. Defects such as tape hiss, wow and flutter are as acceptable as surface noise. They add to the quaint beauty of the cassette.</p>
<p>And here is the thing. I used to make mixtapes. Then one day I decided to &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to CD-Rs. The CD-Rs would surely be more reliable and durable, right? Pah. The CD-Rs I bought were defective. For some reason iTunes (or the CD-R, I don&#8217;t know which) was making the audio of each track start two seconds before the access points. I wasted 4 CD-Rs trying to fix it, to no avail. Then it was reported to me that the CD-R wouldn&#8217;t even play! Annoying or what? The packet of faulty CD-Rs still sits beside me unused.</p>
<p>For all of their faults, cassettes are at least more reliable in the medium term than this. I have come to the decision that CD mixes are a bit like sending someone a letter but typing it out rather than handwriting it. You still put in the hard graft constructing it, but it is still somehow less personal, less human.</p>
<p>Of course, Muxtape is nothing like a mixtape. Indeed, it is probably even worse than a CD. As has been pointed out by David Title, <a href="http://mymediamusings.com/2008/04/03/muxtape-mixwit-and-tempting-riaa/">a real mixtape</a> is:</p>
<blockquote><p>hours of love and care and cursing your slipping on the pause button.  It’s recording little personal messages between the songs.  It’s handwritting the titles and artists in painfully small print.  It’s an act of love.</p></blockquote>
<p>Muxtapes cannot even be personal. The terms (whatever they&#8217;re worth, given the dubious legality of the service) restrict you to one account only &#8212; and that&#8217;s a public account.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, that cute picture of the C90, the blocks of colours, the oh-so-fashionable massive Helvetica font (not that I&#8217;m guilty of that one) and the sheer simplicity of Muxtape is enough to reel you in and get you to make your own.</p>
<p>And make my own I did. <a href="http://doctorvee.muxtape.com/"><b>Here is my Muxtape</b></a>.</p>
<p>I should point out that if you like any of the tunes on my Muxtape, I think you should buy the album (the &#8216;Buy from Amazon&#8217; link on Muxtape is a new addition today &#8212; a handy hint). I bought all of these. In the case of John Cage, I bought four different performances of it. In the case of Autechre, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/31/how-to-quadruple-the-price-of-an-album-and-get-away-with-it/">I bought the album twice</a>.</p>
<p>Incidentally, there is an interesting take on <a href="http://alex.sashalynne.com/?p=58">the legality or otherwise of Muxtape</a> at WebJam. The fact that Muxtape does not provide you with an easy method to download the music may be its saving grace. Besides, the cat is out of the bag. In the same way as shutting down Napster didn&#8217;t stop peer to peer filesharing, closing down Muxtape will only lead to several new clones of it.</p>
<p>On the simplicity of Muxtape, it is appealing &#8212; but it does make it rather light of features. There is no search function and even Google is blocked from indexing pages on Maxtape. Instead, you are presented with a random list of Muxtapes. Apart from that, you have to rely on word-of-mouth to find anyone&#8217;s Muxtape.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just as well some clever fellow has created <a href="http://pipes.yahoo.com/joelaz/muxtape_recommendations">a smart Last.fm / Muxtape mashup</a> (<a href="http://del.icio.us/qwghlm">via Qwghlm</a>). Enter in your Last.fm username and it will find Muxtapes containing artists that you like. Awesome.</p>
<p>In the meantime, it&#8217;s worth remembering that Last.fm itself has provided its own playlist service for years now, and it is on much more solid legal ground. There are some annoying restrictions &#8212; of course, you can only choose from the tracks that Last.fm has on its servers. Plus, perhaps even more frustratingly, the music is shuffled. This robs you of one of the joys of putting together a mixtape: getting the track order right. <a href="http://www.last.fm/listen/user/doctorvee/playlist">Catch my Last.fm playlist here</a>.</p>
<style type="text/css">table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 td {margin:0 !important;padding:0 !important;border:0 !important;}table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 tr.lfmHead a:hover {background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/header/playlist/regular_grey.png) no-repeat 0 0 !important;}table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 tr.lfmEmbed object {float:left;}table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 tr.lfmFoot td.lfmConfig a:hover {background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat 0px 0 !important;;}table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 tr.lfmFoot td.lfmView a:hover {background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat -85px 0 !important;}table.lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224 tr.lfmFoot td.lfmPopup a:hover {background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat -159px 0 !important;}</style>
<table class="lfmWidgetplaylist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="width:184px;">
<tr class="lfmHead">
<td><a title="doctorvee’s Playlist" href="http://www.last.fm/listen/user/doctorvee/playlist" target="_blank" style="display:block;overflow:hidden;height:20px;width:184px;background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/header/playlist/regular_grey.png) no-repeat 0 -20px;text-decoration:none;border:0;"></a></td>
</tr>
<tr class="lfmEmbed">
<td><object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/playlist/25.swf" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=7,0,0,0" width="184" height="284" ><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/playlist/25.swf" /><param name="flashvars" value="lfmMode=playlist&amp;resourceType=37&amp;resourceID=19306&amp;username=doctorvee&amp;title=doctorvee%E2%80%99s+Playlist&amp;theme=grey&amp;radioURL=user%2Fdoctorvee%2Fplaylist&amp;lang=en&amp;widget_id=playlist_926ee4f4c699478eebb86a45d723c224" /><param name="bgcolor" value="999999" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /></object></td>
</tr>
<tr class="lfmFoot">
<td style="background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/footer_bg/grey.png) repeat-x 0 0;text-align:right;">
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" style="width:184px;">
<tr>
<td class="lfmConfig"><a href="http://www.last.fm/widgets/?colour=grey&amp;size=regular&amp;autostart=0&amp;url=user%2Fdoctorvee%2Fplaylist&amp;user=doctorvee&amp;from=code&amp;widget=playlist" title="Get your own widget" target="_blank" style="display:block;overflow:hidden;width:85px;height:20px;float:right;background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat 0px -20px;text-decoration:none;border:0;"></a></td>
<td class="lfmView" style="width:74px;"><a href="http://www.last.fm/user/doctorvee/" title="View doctorvee's profile" target="_blank" style="display:block;overflow:hidden;width:74px;height:20px;background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat -85px -20px;text-decoration:none;border:0;"></a></td>
<td class="lfmPopup"style="width:25px;"><a href="http://www.last.fm/widgets/popup/?colour=grey&amp;size=regular&amp;autostart=0&amp;url=user%2Fdoctorvee%2Fplaylist&amp;user=doctorvee&amp;from=code&amp;widget=playlist&amp;resize=1" title="Load this playlist in a pop up" target="_blank" style="display:block;overflow:hidden;width:25px;height:20px;background:url(http://cdn.last.fm/widgets/images/en/footer/grey.png) no-repeat -159px -20px;text-decoration:none;border:0;" onclick="window.open(this.href + '&amp;resize=0','lfm_popup','height=384,width=234,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes'); return false;"></a></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/11/muxtape-playlist-nostalgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on the BBC&#8217;s music&#160;podcasts</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/06/thoughts-on-the-bbcs-music-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/06/thoughts-on-the-bbcs-music-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 03:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[6-music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc radio labs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bruce dickinson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[freak zone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[podcasts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radio-1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stuart maconie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/06/thoughts-on-the-bbcs-music-podcasts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago the BBC announced that it had reached an agreement that allowed them to use commercial music on their podcasts. This meant that, at last, the BBC could produce music podcasts. The only problem was that music could only be included in the form of clips a maximum of 30 seconds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2007/11/music_podcasts.shtml">the BBC announced</a> that it had reached an agreement that allowed them to use commercial music on their podcasts. This meant that, at last, the BBC could produce <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2007/11_november/11/pod.shtml">music podcasts</a>. The only problem was that music could only be included in the form of clips a maximum of 30 seconds long.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what most people think, but that sets off sirens in my head &#8212; music podcasts where the music is cut short. Of course, it is much better than having no music at all, so we should be thankful for this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/2007/11/music_podcasts.shtml">The original blog post about it</a> was on the BBC&#8217;s interesting <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/radiolabs/">Radio Labs blog</a> &#8212; take a look at it if you&#8217;re interested in the future of radio. There, Chris Kimber made a valiant attempt at explaining how and why the new music podcasts would work.</p>
<blockquote><p>The interesting thing for me is going to be working out what works well as a podcast as opposed to a linear radio broadcast. Our approach generally is to offer &#8220;short form audio snacks&#8221;, rather than try to replicate the whole programme experience but with short music clips instead of full tracks. All the research we have done into podcasting suggests that people generally want something special and different from normal broadcast radio programmes, and that short is better than long. Most of our speech podcasts are a maximum of 30 mins long, but with these new music podcasts we are aiming for really short form - about ten minutes is what I&#8217;m recommending.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is just a personal preference (and I know I am in a minority), but I have always preferred long things to short things. I prefer 70 minute long albums, and can just about tolerate a 45 minute long album. But I feel offended and ripped off if an album lasts 35 minutes or shorter.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that most of the BBC&#8217;s speech podcasts are 30 minutes long maximum. Two of the four BBC speech podcasts I subscribe to typically last 50 minutes. A ten minute long podcast is not normally my cup of tea &#8212; I prefer them to be half an hour to an hour long.</p>
<p>So initially I was sceptical about these new music podcasts. But I went ahead and subscribed to the music podcast that appealed to me most &#8212; <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/freakzone/">Stuart Maconie&#8217;s Freak Zone</a>. My fears came true the first time I listened to it. I found it an unsatisfying listen.</p>
<p>I think a lot of this may be to do with the style of the programme. Sadly, I am no longer a tweenager, so I don&#8217;t know if the format works better for, for instance, the Radio 1 indie podcast. But I imagine it would. An indie tune doesn&#8217;t typically evolve much from beginning to end, and a short thirty second burst is probably enough to get a full flavour of the song.</p>
<p>But the Freak Zone is too analytical and beard-strokey to treat music like this (interestingly, the podcast tends to last half an hour rather than the recommended 10 minutes). The show prides itself on playing the weird and wonderful obscurities that you wouldn&#8217;t hear elsewhere. As such, the pieces of music are more deserving of a full hearing, as it were.</p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/6music/shows/freakzone/tracklisting_20071118.shtml">first episode</a> of the podcast I downloaded, a short clip of &#8216;Autopsy&#8217; by Fairport Convention was played. After that, Stuart Maconie began talking about the song&#8217;s time signatures, wonderful arrangement and lyrics. I just thought to myself, &#8220;Yeah, not that I heard much of it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I am now a regular listener of the Freak Zone podcast. Even though the music clips aren&#8217;t long enough, the speech content is interesting enough.</p>
<p>The podcast is definitely doing its job, at least as far as the BBC&#8217;s hopes go.</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s a buzz of excitement in interactive teams, and the radio stations too, about how this can get our audio content to people who don&#8217;t normally listen, or who would much prefer to listen in their own time, on their own portable media device.</p></blockquote>
<p>That certainly describes me. Prior to downloading the podcast, I had only ever listened to the programme once or twice (back in the days when it was presented by Bruce Dickinson). The timeslot doesn&#8217;t suit me well, and it is true that I probably wouldn&#8217;t even listen to the full show even if I could download it (and I&#8217;ve never listened to it on Listen Again).</p>
<p>Despite my reservations, the digest podcast suits me very well indeed. Just a shame about the short length of the music clips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/01/06/thoughts-on-the-bbcs-music-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My top ten Channel&#160;4&#160;programmes</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/08/my-top-ten-channel-4-programmes/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/08/my-top-ten-channel-4-programmes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[11-o'clock-show]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[4later]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[big-breakfast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brass-eye]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[channel-4]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[charlie-brooker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chart-show]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chris-morris]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[crystal-maze]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[father-ted]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fort-boyard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iain-lee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nigel-buckland]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[popworld]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[richard-bacon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[richard-o'brien]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ricky-gervais]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sacha-baron-cohen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[simon-amstell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tony-slattery]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trip]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[whose-line-is-it-anyway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/08/my-top-ten-channel4-programmes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Channel 4 celebrated its 25th birthday. John asked in the comments about people&#8217;s top ten Channel 4 programmes. I would have written this at the time anyway, but I didn&#8217;t have the time and figured I&#8217;d just let it slip under the radar. However, since the question was asked, I will answer it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/">Channel 4 celebrated its 25<sup>th</sup> birthday</a>. <a href="http://johnisagrownup.blogspot.com/2007/11/my-top-10-channel-4-programmes.html">John</a> asked <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/#comment-188149">in the comments</a> about people&#8217;s top ten Channel 4 programmes. I would have written this at the time anyway, but I didn&#8217;t have the time and figured I&#8217;d just let it slip under the radar. However, since the question was asked, I will answer it anyway.</p>
<p>Bear in mind that I am actually younger than Channel 4 is. As such, you won&#8217;t find me waxing lyrical about Max Headroom or Minipops. This is, I&#8217;m afraid, strictly 1990s onwards.</p>
<p>These are in no particular order, just what I thought would flow well.</p>
<h3>Brass Eye</h3>
<p>Following The Day Today, Chris Morris took the skewed news concept a step further with Brass Eye. The programme was sometimes controversial, with everybody specatcularly failing to &#8216;get&#8217; the paedophile episode. Brass Eye highlighted and parodied media wrongs. Here is a clip about the Bad Aids.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kFNs2mOkKzc&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kFNs2mOkKzc&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Jam</h3>
<p>Most people seem to be choosing Brass Eye in these lists, as have I. But I was more fond of one of Chris Morris&#8217;s other Channel 4 programmes, Jam. This disturbing sketch show was shot with strange visual effects and set to a constant background track of ambient music. Quite unique and strange, it really set itself apart from other sketch shows.</p>
<p>The programme often dealt with subject matters that might be seen as taboo. But you can&#8217;t help thinking, &#8220;doesn&#8217;t he have a point?&#8221; It would be irresponsible of me to compare this sketch to any recent news events.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/jLBtO6diixU&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/jLBtO6diixU&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>4Later</h3>
<p>4Later was a strand of late-night programming that ran for a few years earlier this decade. The range of programmes was pretty eclectic. Low budget games and DVD review shows Bits and Vidz were cult classics. Disinfo Nation was an &#8220;alternative news programme&#8221;. 4Later was the home of the last series of Babylon 5. Late Night Poker was the original poker programme that started the craze. A remixed version of Chris Morris&#8217;s Jam was perfectly suited to the late-night vibe.</p>
<p>It is such a shame that 4later was unceremoniously axed, taking with it all of its good programmes. Late nights on Channel 4 simply haven&#8217;t been the same since.</p>
<p>One of my favourite programmes on 4Later was The Trip, which mixed archive film footage with arty music. I&#8217;m so delighted to have found some clips of it on YouTube! It was just perfect for the late-night slot, and well worth staying up for, especially since the feeling that you were about to drop off just added to the vibe. It is probably fair to say that, combined with Jam, this programme shaped my taste in music a lot in my mid-teens.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KqJYtA6HeYc&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KqJYtA6HeYc&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>The Big Breakfast</h3>
<p>Kudos to Channel 4 for trying something different with the morning slot. Normally, if you don&#8217;t want news or children&#8217;s programmes, you can forget about morning television.</p>
<p>It was a tricky balancing act though. It was sometimes unwatchably chaotic, and sometimes seemingly the whole programme was on the verge of complete collapse. At times it also seemed as though they were all just having fun for themselves and completely forgot about the viewer. I found this particularly during the Johnny and Denise phase.</p>
<p>I was quite fond of the programme in its later years. But for whatever reason, the viewing public switched off. Channel 4 tried something similar with its replacement, RI:SE, but it completely misfired. The Big Breakfast had some kind of magic ingredient that made it work for a few years in the 1990s. But today, we are back to the usual diet of news and children&#8217;s programmes. Anything else would just feel wrong.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a particularly special clip, but it is typical of the kind of material that was featured on The Big Breakfast in its later years. Nigel Buckland, presenter of late-night film show Vidz, reviewed some Christmas DVDs in 2002. You might see what I mean when I say the programme was a bit shambolic.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GiLWjEo-2cc&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GiLWjEo-2cc&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>The 11 O&#8217;Clock Show</h3>
<p>It is true that The 11 O&#8217;Clock Show was sometimes embarassingly bad. This was bound to happen when it was broadcast daily (soon cut back to three days a week). I still thought it contained more good jokes per week than just about any other programme. Still, it was all too easy for the programme to lapse into telling easy cock jokes.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not forget, though, that it was the early home of Sacha Baron Cohen and Ricky Gervais. The huge writing team also had some great names working for it. Charlie Brooker leaps out in my memory. So it&#8217;s not as if it had unfunny people working for it. It was worth tuning in to wait for the good bits.</p>
<p>At the time, the programme was perhaps most famous for Iain Lee&#8217;s vox pops. Sometimes I got the feeling that the people in the vox pops were told what to say, but they were still funny nevertheless. This one doesn&#8217;t look like it has actors, but it does contain lots of dirty jokes about bodily fluids.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/UQgw1yaIlBg&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/UQgw1yaIlBg&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Whose Line is it Anyway?</h3>
<p>I guess with the improvisational nature of the show, it was bound to be hit and miss. But when it was hit, Whose Line was hysterically funny. It has also stood the test of time rather well. The American version is screened regularly on Five US, and recently the UK version began to be shown on Dave. I find that it&#8217;s well worth giving it a look whenever it&#8217;s on because there is likely to be at least one laugh-so-much-you-cry moment.</p>
<p>Here is a &#8216;hoedown&#8217; game from one of the later series of the UK version. Tony Slattery is obviously near his lowest point here which isn&#8217;t good to see, but nevertheless it is very funny.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QnOu70TQjpw&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QnOu70TQjpw&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Father Ted</h3>
<p>This programme surely needs no introduction. The silly sitcom is the best of the past fifteen years in my view. Here is the classic moment from the Christmas special when Ted, Dougal and others get lost in Ireland&#8217;s biggest lingerie section.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/foFXj7pEj4g&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/foFXj7pEj4g&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>The Chart Show</h3>
<p>I can just about remember a time when The Chart Show was not The ITV Chart Show. A few months ago I found myself getting very nostalgic and watching lots of videos of old episodes of The Chart Show on YouTube. It was so different to the other music programmes on offer, with nothing in the way of live performances, and no presenters apart from quirky Amiga graphics.</p>
<p>Of course, nowadays most music programming is like this because it&#8217;s the most cost-effective way to do it. But even watching The Chart Show today, it has its own little quirks. The whole &#8216;FFWD&#8217; / &#8216;RWND&#8217; stuff was a bit gimmicky, but remained in one form or another until its last show in 1998.</p>
<p>For some reason, all of the Channel 4 versions have been removed from YouTube, while many ITV episodes remain! Here is a clip from not long after the change of channels in 1989.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/k3rDxmRZT5w&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/k3rDxmRZT5w&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>The Crystal Maze</h3>
<p>Is this the greatest gameshow ever? Yes. The Crystal Maze also must be one of the very few programme adaptations to be better than the original it was based on. Fort Boyard was good, but bland in comparison to The Crystal Maze.</p>
<p>Partly this is down to the ingenuity of the puzzles, and the different zones. But a lot of it is also down to the charismatic Richard O&#8217;Brien. His sarcastic comments just sum it up whenever the team messes up, which it invariably does. And of course, he had that harmonica to hand whenever he felt like putting the team off. And then there was that strange relationship with the computer in the futuristic zone&#8230;</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eWtSRppKo5Y&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eWtSRppKo5Y&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Popworld</h3>
<p>While the staid BBC subjected the nation&#8217;s youth to Fearne Cotton&#8217;s asinine interviews with boring boy bands, over on Channel 4 you could watch Simon Amstell being sarcastic to them. Some bands played along with it, while others took great offence. And who would believe it, it was those wankerish indie bands who were worse than the bubblegum pop groups. Essential viewing for weekend mornings, <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/04/15/weekend-mornings-are-meaningless-once-again/">as I have already written on this blog</a>.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-NbwTQu6P78&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-NbwTQu6P78&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/08/my-top-ten-channel-4-programmes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channel 4&#8217;s 25th&#160;anniversary</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[channel-4]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hamlet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[idents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spoof]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[television-presentation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Channel 4 is 25 years old today. It&#8217;s really the only commercial broadcaster worth watching. Mind you, even Channel 4 is a bit shit these days.
But the important thing is that its idents are still awesome, as they always have been. It&#8217;s great to see that Channel 4&#8217;s continuity is all in the style of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1126028613" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1266416829&#038;playerId=1126028613&#038;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&#038;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&#038;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&#038;domain=embed&#038;autoStart=false&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>Channel 4 is 25 years old today. It&#8217;s really the only commercial broadcaster worth watching. Mind you, even Channel 4 is a bit shit these days.</p>
<p>But the important thing is that its idents are still awesome, as they always have been. It&#8217;s great to see that Channel 4&#8217;s continuity is all in the style of the original iconic designs, with a range of classic idents being shown (some of which I&#8217;ve never seen before).</p>
<p>The original idents lasted an astonishing 14 years. That&#8217;s an age &#8212; you&#8217;d never see an ident package lasting that long nowadays. Even more amazingly, the original &#8216;4&#8242; logo has never changed, merely being adapted for each new era.</p>
<p>The coloured blocks were well loved and recognisable enough for Hamlet to create this spoof version for an advert. For me, it&#8217;s surprising in two ways. For one, I&#8217;m surprised Channel 4 and the regulators allowed them to do it, given that it could have easily been confused for an actual ident.</p>
<p>Then there is the fact that it is tobacco being advertised &#8212; something from a different era. It goes to show just how far Hamlet were determined to advertise despite all the regulations. Sometimes a restrictive environment can make you come up with the best ideas.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/FegmPKnARuo"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/FegmPKnARuo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>It was always going to be a tough act to follow the coloured blocks. I seem to remember the circles era was quite unpopular, but I thought they were quite good.</p>
<p><embed src="http://services.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/1126028613" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=1266104732&#038;playerId=1126028613&#038;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://services.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&#038;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&#038;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&#038;domain=embed&#038;autoStart=false&#038;" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed>I also liked the &#8217;squares and stripes&#8217; era, although it dated really quickly.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/cfc8vN5z9yY&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/cfc8vN5z9yY&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>So it was a bit of a shock to see just how excellent the following ident package was!</p>
<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_I1F41ujBg&#038;rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_I1F41ujBg&#038;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>
<p>Genius.</p>
<p>Channel 4 have a couple of special websites up and running for the occasion as well.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/C/c4_at_25/index.html">Channel 4 at 25</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/general/channel_4_news_at_25">Channel 4 News at 25</a></li>
</ul>
<p>More classic Channel 4 idents can be found at <a href="http://thetvroom.com/ch4/">The TV Room</a>. BBC News Online has <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7062390.stm">25 facts about 25 years of Channel 4</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/11/02/channel-4s-25th-anniversary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC1, Virgin 1 and BBC Two&#160;2</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/18/abc1-virgin-1-and-bbc-two-2/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/18/abc1-virgin-1-and-bbc-two-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[8-simple-rules]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[abc1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc-two]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bskyb]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[channel-five]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comedy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david-cameron]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digital-television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[freeview]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ftn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gameshows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[john-ritter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mark-lamarr]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[never-mind-the-buzzcocks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[question-of-sport]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sky]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sky-one]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[uktv]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[uktv-g2]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virgin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virgin-1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[virgin-media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[whose-line-is-it-anyway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/18/abc1-virgin-1-and-bbc-two-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am quite a fan of Freeview. Even though I hardly ever watch any television these days, I think it is so wonderful to have that kind of choice fairly hassle-free for £20-odd. There have been quite a lot of changes to Freeview recently.
First came the unexpected and abrupt death of ABC1. It wasn&#8217;t a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am quite a fan of Freeview. Even though I hardly ever watch any television these days, I think it is so wonderful to have that kind of choice fairly hassle-free for £20-odd. There have been quite a lot of changes to Freeview recently.</p>
<p>First came the unexpected and abrupt death of ABC1. It wasn&#8217;t a bad channel, but it always seemed like there was something that didn&#8217;t quite work about it. When it launched there were no adverts for months &#8212; so how was it funded? Then there was the distinct lack of space on prime-time on Freeview, which essentially made ABC1 a daytime-only channel.</p>
<p>ABC1&#8217;s schedule was therefore restricted to rather tame American comedies. The same ones. Over and over again. What&#8217;s more, they did that odd thing that digital channels sometimes do, of showing the episodes seemingly in random order. This was especially problematic for 8 Simple Rules. One minute John Ritter was dead, the next he had come back to life! And then he was dead again.</p>
<p>In a way this was a good thing though, because you knew what you were getting. Unchallenging, homely television. And there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. I imagine that if ABC1 was around ten years ago, I would have loved watching it on the days when I was off sick from school.</p>
<p>Then came <a href="http://virgin1.virginmedia.com/">Virgin 1</a>, which is Virgin Media&#8217;s latest little stone thrown in their big bear fight with BSkyB. &#8220;Oh, they think they&#8217;re so smart having a channel called Sky One,&#8221; some Virgin Media big-wig probably said on day. &#8220;We&#8217;ll show them! We can have Virgin 1.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, Ftn has been killed to death just when it was getting good. I loved Ftn in its later days. Its repeats of retro gameshows like The Crystal Maze, The Krypton Factor and Bullseye were strangely captivating. Then later at night there was always Takeshi&#8217;s Castle if you were up for vegetating a bit. While it was always Freeview&#8217;s worst channel, in the past year or so it had carved out a distinctive identity for itself.</p>
<p>The new channel, on the other hand, does not have a distinctive flavour. In fact, it is almost as if they looked at Sky One and decided &#8220;we want a programme like that, a programme like that, and a programme like that.&#8221;</p>
<p>In short, it is like a watered-down version of Channel Five. Do we really need another channel full of sub-standard American imports? I think not. I would have thought that, especially with the Virgin brand attached to it, they would have put a bit more effort in to make it more distinctive.</p>
<p>Then this week there was the launch of Dave. Dave is essentially a re-branding of UKTV G2, so it&#8217;s good to know they&#8217;ve gone from one silly name to another. A lot of people are going on about what a great name Dave is for a channel, but I think it is quite silly. They say that it&#8217;s based on the idea that &#8220;everyone knows a bloke called Dave&#8221;, which is true. The problem is that whenever I hear the name I think of that balloon-faced Conservative leader.</p>
<p>As for the programming it&#8217;s a bit of a mixed bag. Watching Dave is like being transported back to the 1990s. Have I Got News For You, Red Dwarf and Bottom are among its roster. Essentially, Dave seems to me like BBC Two 2. It&#8217;s the channel that BBC Three secretly wishes it could be, if only it could be unleashed from all of those quotas to do with repeats.</p>
<p>Then there is Never Mind the Buzzcocks. I can&#8217;t stand watching it, at least when it was hosted by Mark Lamarr. He seems like a genuinely spiteful person. He tells nasty jokes about people, which I don&#8217;t mind usually. But Mark Lamarr doesn&#8217;t seem to tell them in the sense of &#8220;I&#8217;m only having a laugh&#8221;. He seems to be genuinely nasty. I can&#8217;t stand watching it. For a further insight into the dark world of Never Mind the Buzzcocks, <a href="http://adam-buxton.co.uk/ad/2006/12/07/humiliating-tv-appearance-news/">check out this blog post by Adam Buxton</a>.</p>
<p>But without a doubt the worst programme on Dave is A Question of Sport. Why does this programme still exist, even in repeat form? It is just diabolical.</p>
<p>Fortunately, this crime is outweighed by the repeats of Whose Line is it Anyway. Now, why is Whose Line is it Anyway not on any more, huh?</p>
<p>Despite the patchy output, the launch of Dave on Freeview seems to add a lot of value. It is replacing UKTV Bright Ideas, which I doubt will be missed by many people. The hours for UKTV History have been cut back, which might not be very popular. But let&#8217;s face it. Everyone knows that history channels only ever get ratings if they either</p>
<ol type="a">
<li>Show programmes that are nothing to do with history</li>
<li>Dedicate their entire schedule to programmes about Adolf Hitler&#8217;s second cousin twice removed&#8217;s hairdresser&#8217;s pet ostrich.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/18/abc1-virgin-1-and-bbc-two-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White Noise &#8212; An Electric&#160;Storm</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/06/white-noise-an-electric-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/06/white-noise-an-electric-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aphex-twin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[asa-chang-&amp;-junray]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc-news]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc-radiophonic-workshop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[beatles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[brian-hodgson]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david-lowe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david-vorhaus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[delia-derbyshire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[doctor-who]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[electronic-music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[experimental-music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[greenwich-time-signal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[island-records]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stereolab]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[synthesisers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theme-tune]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[white-noise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/06/white-noise-an-electric-storm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Despite my interest in electronic music, my collection &#8212; shamefully &#8212; doesn&#8217;t contain very much from before the 1990s. The only ones that I can think of from the top of my head are an album of music from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop, some Brian Eno and Steve Reich. A recent purchase makes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Electric-Storm-White-Noise/dp/B000QEKHQW/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/203-8362344-0189529?ie=UTF8&#038;s=music&#038;qid=1191624891&#038;sr=8-1"> <img src="http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/51EEQJ3tuzL._AA240_.jpg" alt="An Electric Storm cover art" class="picture" /></a> Despite my interest in electronic music, my collection &#8212; shamefully &#8212; doesn&#8217;t contain very much from before the 1990s. The only ones that I can think of from the top of my head are an album of music from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop, some Brian Eno and Steve Reich. A recent purchase makes me wonder if I should be buying more old electronic music.</p>
<p>White Noise was the idea of David Vorhaus, a classical double bassist with an interest in electronics. After attending a lecture, he approached members of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop &#8212; Delia Derbyshire (creator of the famous Doctor Who theme tune) and Brian Hodgson (who created the sounds of the Tardis and the Daleks). Together, they worked for a year on <i>An Electric Storm</i>, perhaps one of the most seminal electronic music albums there has ever been.</p>
<p>Incidentally, Delia Derbyshire was a genius in her own right. On an album showcasing <a href="http://www.discogs.com/release/212869">Music from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop</a>, Derbyshire&#8217;s work stands out. &#8216;Time to Go&#8217; takes the famous pips of the Greenwich Time Signal and turns it into a cacophony of blips and bleeps before descending into farts, burps and squirts. I wonder if it inspired <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/4992088.stm">David Lowe</a>?</p>
<p>&#8216;Ziwzih Ziwzih OO-OO-OO&#8217; is my favourite though. An utterly mad piece of music centring around a mad robotic chant. It sounds like it could have been created by a trippy early 1970s rock band, but it was made by a geek in a lab. There is a clip about this particular piece on <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/music/features/alchemists.shtml">this page about the BBC documentary &#8216;Alchemists of Sound&#8217;</a>.</p>
<p>Back to <i>An Electric Storm</i> though. Listening to it, you can tell that it is not a recent work. It contains the sort of tricks used by the Radiophonic Workshop. But in a way this is what amazes me the most about it. This album is almost forty years old, yet it sounds more amazing than a great deal of the electronic music made today.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all the more impressive when you consider the multiple hurdles the group had to clear. Having signed a contract with Island Records, they realised that they didn&#8217;t know how they were going to record the album. The first works were made by sneaking into the studios of the Radiophonic Workshop. But making an entire album this way would have been too risky. They had to build their own studio and using home-made equipment.</p>
<p>The album was made in an era before the widespread availability of synthesisers. Most of the noises were made by tape manipulation, a laborious task. The technique sounds a bit like an audio version of stop-motion animation. An original sound (from, for instance, Vorhaus&#8217;s bass) would have to be sped up or slowed down for each and every note. Even echo effects were achieved by rather crude means &#8212; playing two identical tapes out of phase.</p>
<p>A particularly ambitious song, &#8216;The Visitation&#8217;, took three months to make. Recording was taking so long that they faced legal action from Island and had to finish the album overnight. That the track in question &#8212; &#8216;Black Mass: An Electric Storm in Hell&#8217; &#8212; doesn&#8217;t sound as though it was particularly rushed boggles my mind.</p>
<p>And what did White Noise receive for their toil? The album sold a paltry 200 copies in its first year, and the group made just £280. Luckily for us, and for electronic music as a whole, it gained traction in subsequent years and became an underground classic. This year it was remastered and re-released.</p>
<p>It is a genuinely pioneering record. Today an artist is labelled &#8216;experimental&#8217; just for using a farty synth. But White Noise were actually pushing the boundaries and creating something truly amazing. It&#8217;s incredible to think that something so ambitious for its time should actually stand the test of time this well.</p>
<p>The album opens with the intriguing &#8216;Love Without Sound&#8217;. Vorhaus&#8217;s intention was to release this as a single to try and convert the population to electronic music. The result is a song that is equal parts accessible and impenetrable.</p>
<p>John Whitman&#8217;s vocals are other-worldly and detached. The music is a surreal, part-humorous, part-unsettling cacophony of clicks, clacks and warbles. This cleverly interacts with female laughs and moans. Despite the wide and unpredictable range of sounds, the resulting collage makes perfect sense, in its own surreal way. Think the &#8220;ho-ho, he-he, ha-ha&#8221; bit in &#8216;I Am the Walrus&#8217;, but lasting for an entire song.</p>
<p>This is followed by &#8216;My Game of Loving&#8217;. This track features a famous section of mad tumbling drums laid on top of a kaleidoscopic orgy which is comically followed by snoring. The sex-frenzy is sonically interesting, but make sure you don&#8217;t have your iPod too loud or you&#8217;ll get some funny looks on the train.</p>
<p>This track particularly reminds me of two more recent electronic acts. The spliced tabla-style drums remind me very much of Asa-Chang &#038; Junray, while I would be amazed if the orgy section didn&#8217;t inspire some of Aphex Twin&#8217;s more humorous moments. This is not to mention Stereolab and Broadcast, who are influenced by White Noise as a whole.</p>
<p>The humour continues on the next track, &#8216;Here Come the Fleas&#8217;. While today&#8217;s electronic musicians are perceived as being serious, beard-stroking types, &#8216;Here Come the Fleas&#8217; reminds you of the comedy potential of electronic music. The song lays into a lazy slob&#8217;s poor hygiene standards. The middle of the song is dominated by a brilliant section that would have made a cool guitar solo. It would have been so easy just to pick up a guitar and do it, but they had to go the hard way and make it with tapes, didn&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>That is on the &#8220;happy&#8221; side, known as &#8216;Phase-In&#8217;. People must have thought that this pioneering electronic music is a barrel of laughs. They were in for a shock when the turned the record over for the &#8216;Phase-Out&#8217; side. The smiles and laughter are wiped away and the listener is treated to something that approaches the horror genre.</p>
<p>&#8216;The Visitation&#8217; &#8212; the track that took three months to make &#8212; is, for me, the highlight of the album. This stunning piece is about a couple of lovers who are torn apart by a motorcycle accident. As the girl screams, &#8220;please don&#8217;t go&#8221;, the motorcycle crashes. The spirit of the man who was killed tries to communicate with his weeping girlfriend, but is unable to.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite spine-chilling really. The music is genuinely haunting and really paints a picture of a dark, rainy night on a remote road where the motorcyclist is killed. It uses stereo to brilliant effect as well.</p>
<p>The singing and narration also creates the right mood. The spirit&#8217;s voice echoes spookily, while the singer is the coldly neutral bearer of bad news. When he sings, &#8220;Her lover&#8217;s not asleep, he&#8217;s DEEEAAAAD&#8221;, it makes the hairs on my neck stand up.</p>
<p>As I said, it could actually be a horror film. It would make a cracking piece of radio drama. This could be one of my favourite pieces of music. An eleven minute journey into a horrifying affair &#8212; it&#8217;s impossible not to feel sad listening to it.</p>
<p>Listening to <i>An Electric Storm</i>, there is no doubt that it is a unique product of 1969, the like of which could never be made again. <a href="http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/record_review/44499-an-electric-storm">Pitchfork&#8217;s review of the album says</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>White Noise&#8217;s landmark 1969 album An Electric Storm might not the first thing most people think of when considering 1960s music, but there are few records anywhere tied more intrinsically to the moment of their creation. Recorded in the months immediately prior to the widespread availability of keyboard-based synthesizers, An Electric Storm might be one of the most painstakingly crafted electronic recordings of all time. Pieced together on improvised equipment via innumerable tape edits, this remarkable album is at once futuristic and unavoidably date-stamped, serving as a fascinating audio snapshot of a bygone era in sound generation and recording technology.</p></blockquote>
<p>This was a time before the widespread use of synthesisers and computers, but at a time where there was a lot of enthusiasm and ambition for electronic music. I can&#8217;t help thinking that it&#8217;s just a little bit too easy to make electronic music today. It is impossible to imagine anyone except the bravest / maddest of souls dedicating a year of their lives laboriously fiddling about with tapes when they could just use their laptop to embark on a sonic adventure.</p>
<p>Given just how mind-bending this early electronic music is compared to a lot of today&#8217;s identikit techno, I can&#8217;t help but wonder if advances in technology have restricted musicians as much as liberated them.</p>
<p>If you are remotely interested in electronic music, I would recommend this almost as a must-buy. Not only is the music amazing, but it is also a real insight into the painstaking approaches of electronic musicians of the past (the sleeve notes are brilliantly educational in this regard). It really is true to say that they don&#8217;t make them like they used to.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.last.fm/music/White+Noise/An+Electric+Storm">Last.fm page for <i>An Electric Storm</i></a> with sound clips</li>
<li><a href="http://www.headheritage.co.uk/unsung/review/1143">A great review of <i>An Electric Storm</i></a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Noise_%28band%29">White Noise Wikipedia entry</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.myspace.com/whiteunderscorenoise">Official White Noise MySpace (!)</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/10/06/white-noise-an-electric-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blur reunion on the&#160;cards!</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/18/blur-reunion-on-the-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/18/blur-reunion-on-the-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[13]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[1990s]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alex-james]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[britpop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[damon-albarn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david-walliams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gorillaz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[graham-coxon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[matt-lucas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ok-computer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reunion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rock-profile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[think-tank]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wigwam]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/18/blur-reunion-on-the-cards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;ve been away for long enough for a proper reunion. But when you think about it, the last album Blur recorded with Graham Coxon was released almost nine years ago! This should make every Britpop fan feel really, really old.
The rumours have been going for a while. Just last year I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t feel like they&#8217;ve been away for long enough for a proper reunion. But when you think about it, the last album Blur recorded with Graham Coxon was released almost nine years ago! This should make every Britpop fan feel really, really old.</p>
<p>The rumours have been going for a while. Just last year I had heard that all of the members of Blur were suing each other. Now <a href="http://www.thisisfakediy.co.uk/articles/7021/Blur-Reunion-Definite.html">it seems confirmed</a> that they are all &#8212; including Coxon &#8212; going into the recording studio very soon.</p>
<p>The fact that Graham Coxon is back is the real news though. He was pretty central to Blur. You could tell that just by listening to the sans-Coxon Blur album, <i>Think Tank</i>, which felt really empty and half-arsed. After a lacklustre album, it wasn&#8217;t a surprise to see Blur fizzle out. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, Graham Coxon&#8217;s solo career sky-rocketed. And who could blame Damon Albarn for not being too bothered given the success (and, let&#8217;s face it, damn good music) of Gorillaz. (The less said about Alex James&#8217;s <a href="http://checkingoutmywigwam.com/">WigWam</a>, the better. At best the song sounds like an awful re-hash of &#8216;Girls and Boys&#8217;. And worst it sounds like the consequences of too many drugs.)</p>
<p><i>Think Tank</i> and the death of Blur was a disappointment because their previous album, <i>13</i>, is for my money one of the best albums of the 1990s. I still feel that the was completely overlooked by the media and the public, who at the time were too busy still fawning over <i>OK Computer</i> to notice anything else.</p>
<p>Listening to some of the older Blur material, it is easy to see why everyone got so excited about the whole Britpop thing. Blur wrote so many of the great pop songs of the 1990s. You can see this by looking at the tracklisting to their <i>Best of</i> album &#8212; more notable for the omissions than the inclusions (where were &#8216;Popscene&#8217;, &#8216;Chemical World&#8217;, &#8216;Stereotypes&#8217;&#8230;?).</p>
<p>To celebrate the news of the reunion, it is time for a Blur with Graham Coxon Nostalgic YouTube Extravaganza! (This means a bunch of videos that I will post and will stop working within a week as they get pulled off.)</p>
<h3>Coffee and TV</h3>
<p>The height of Graham Coxon&#8217;s powers as part of Blur.<br />
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kWUil383us4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kWUil383us4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
<p>Click &#8220;Click for more&#8221; for more.</p>
<p><span id="more-2086"></span></p>
<h3>Popscene</h3>
<p><object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlY6rmQfNt4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlY6rmQfNt4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Charmless Man</h3>
<p><object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SMAUJomMl9E"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SMAUJomMl9E" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
<h3>The Universal</h3>
<p><object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PGc2f2282NE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PGc2f2282NE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Trimm Trabb (live)</h3>
<p>A live performance of what is perhaps my favourite Blur song.<br />
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TsHr_hWU0Xc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TsHr_hWU0Xc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
<h3>Rock Profile</h3>
<p>From when Matt Lucas and David Walliams were still funny.<br />
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qJuIH721oIk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qJuIH721oIk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object><br />
<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/D8qOh_bpEZc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/D8qOh_bpEZc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/09/18/blur-reunion-on-the-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Murray Walker reminds us why he&#8217;s&#160;missed</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/24/murray-walker-reminds-us-why-hes-missed/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/24/murray-walker-reminds-us-why-hes-missed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 02:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Formula 1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adelaide]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[clive-james]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david-croft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[european-grand-prix]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[felipe-massa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fernando-alonso]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ferrari]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fleetwood-mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[itv]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[itv-f1]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[itv-sport]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[james-allen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jerez]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[markus-winkelhock]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[martin-brundle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[michael-schumacher]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[murray-walker]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radio-5-live]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/24/murray-walker-reminds-us-why-hes-missed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was another reason why the European Grand Prix was great. It brought the one-off return of Murray Walker, commentating on an F1 race for a UK broadcaster for the first time since 2001.
Radio Five Live&#8217;s regular Formula 1 commentator, David Croft, was off to watch his baby being born. Murray Walker was invited to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was another reason why the <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/24/hamilton-and-massa-are-still-learning-alonso-is-the-master/">European Grand Prix</a> was great. It brought the one-off return of Murray Walker, commentating on an F1 race for a UK broadcaster for the first time since 2001.</p>
<p>Radio Five Live&#8217;s regular Formula 1 commentator, David Croft, was off to watch his baby being born. Murray Walker was invited to fill his chair for one race only.</p>
<p>This presented a dilemma to F1 fans: do you stick with the ITV coverage, or do you switch on the radio to listen to Murray Walker?</p>
<p>I was a little bit worried that Murray Walker&#8217;s commentary would not be up to much. He did, after all, retire for a reason. His later years on ITV were sometimes frustrating to listen to. His mind was not quite as sharp as it once was, and he regularly had to stop mid-sentence to have a coughing fit.</p>
<p>On the one hand, we knew what we were going to get by sticking to the ITV commentary. James Allen is disliked by many, but at least he does not make as many mistakes as Murray Walker was known to in the latter part of his career. ITV also has the excellent Martin Brundle.</p>
<p>But this was a one-off. A chance to listen to the greatest commentator in the world say, &#8220;And it&#8217;s go go go!&#8221; just one last time.</p>
<p>I opted to listen to Murray Walker, but in retrospect I should have recorded his commentary and listened to it after the race. But that wasn&#8217;t anything to do with Murray Walker. He was, in fact, much better than I expected!</p>
<p>But the nature of Radio Five Live meant that three sporting events were being covered at once. And while the Grand Prix took the bulk of the airtime, there were long periods where the focus was on golf or cricket instead. So it was not a full race commentary.</p>
<p>But apart from that, it was a joy to listen to. The producers obviously knew the sort of people who would be tuning in to listen to Murray Walker, and the broadcast began with a familiar tune &#8212; but one that hasn&#8217;t introduced a Grand Prix for over ten years.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kgShypNHZU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7kgShypNHZU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>
<p>&#8220;Aah, they&#8217;re playing my tune!&#8221;, said a delighted Murray Walker. And immediately he was into the swing of things. He didn&#8217;t bumble along as I feared. He might be 83, but you would not be able to guess it. He still knows how to broadcast.</p>
<p>It was classic Murray. He used plenty of catchphrases without descending into self-parody. No one else can start a Grand Prix like Murray Walker.</p>
<blockquote><p>One light. Two lights. Three lights. Four lights! Five lights! &#8230;AND IT&#8217;S GO! GO! GO!</p></blockquote>
<p>It was not perfect throughout. At times he was commentating for the radio, but a couple of times he slipped into saying things like, &#8220;and you are looking at&#8230;&#8221; He also often got tangled up, forgetting people&#8217;s positions from time to time.</p>
<p>There was also a classic &#8220;Murrayism&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>And Winkelhock goes through in the orange Spyker, well down the field&#8230; Well, he&#8217;s not well down the field, he&#8217;s actually in tenth position because he&#8217;s yet to come in.</p></blockquote>
<p>That was when Winkelhock led the race! Although Murray Walker can be forgiven because I found that fact difficult to believe myself&#8230;</p>
<p>I do not agree with everything that Murray Walker says. He supports the British drivers a bit too much for my liking. He was also far too sympathetic to Michael Schumacher. He is seemingly the only person in the world who does not believe that Schumacher deliberately caused crashes at Adelaide in 1994 and Jerez in 1997.</p>
<p>But it is impossible not to love him as a broadcaster. As a describer of action, no one can rival him. Clive James said, &#8220;In his quieter moments, it sounds like his trousers are on fire.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I live to be 83, I hope that I can have just a fraction of the energy and enthusiasm that Murray Walker has. When something interesting his happening on the circuit, Murray Walker is the first to get excited, and soon enough everyone knows about it.</p>
<p>A particularly colourful and vivid description of Alonso overtaking Massa towards the end of the race showed exactly why Murray Walker is so highly regarded.</p>
<blockquote><p>Alonso is practically sawing the Ferrari in half with his nose cone!</p></blockquote>
<p>Utter genius.</p>
<p><i>(Thanks to <a href="http://www.tvotw.co.uk/blog/">Tom</a> for giving me the opportunity to hear Murray Walker&#8217;s commentary even though I was at work when the race was on!)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/07/24/murray-walker-reminds-us-why-hes-missed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another reason to like&#160;Battles</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/17/another-reason-to-like-battles/</link>
		<comments>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/17/another-reason-to-like-battles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[battles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[broadcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cornershop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ian-williams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[indie]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pink-floyd]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radiohead]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rock]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[strokes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tjinder-singh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tortoise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[warp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/17/another-reason-to-like-battles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Guardian has quite an interesting article about &#8220;classic&#8221; albums that do not warrant the hype (via DJ Martian). I wonder if that has one eye on the 10th anniversary of the release of OK Computer?
One interesting album on the list is Dark Side of the Moon, as nominated by Cornershop&#8217;s Tjinder Singh. I was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Guardian</i> has quite an interesting article about <a href="http://music.guardian.co.uk/rock/story/0,,2102991,00.html">&#8220;classic&#8221; albums that do not warrant the hype</a> (<a href="http://djmartian.blogspot.com/2007_06_01_archive.html#1344302145309338922">via DJ Martian</a>). I wonder if that has one eye on the 10<sup>th</sup> anniversary of the release of <i>OK Computer</i>?</p>
<p>One interesting album on the list is <i>Dark Side of the Moon</i>, as nominated by Cornershop&#8217;s Tjinder Singh. I was just thinking recently about how <i>Dark Side of the Moon</i> is probably not Pink Floyd&#8217;s best album. Then someone brought it up in a conversation I had. Now this!</p>
<p>But the one that really made me happy was the inclusion of <i>Is This It</i> by The Strokes. Ian Williams of Battles wrote a paragraph about its mediocrity. Everything he says is spot-on.</p>
<p>I recently wrote about <a href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/07/why-emily-made-me-hate-indie-music-again/">how I loathe indie music</a>. I noted that the turning-point came when I was about 15 or 16 in 2001 &#8212; the year that <i>Is This It</i> was released. Never was an album title so apt.</p>
<p>There was so much hype surrounding The Strokes, it seemed impossible to believe that they would be anything but good. But when a friend made a CD-R of the album for me, I hated it so much that I returned it!</p>
<p><i>Is This It</i> was so bad that it actually gave me a headache. It was so unbelievably conservative, derivative and certainly anything but &#8220;alternative&#8221;. The sheer monotony of the entire album made me depressed.</p>
<p>While I am often willing to give an album more than one chance on the basis that repeated listens can reveal hidden treats, I have refused to listen to <i>Is This It</i> a second time. It was obvious that this album had absolutely nothing to offer. And I didn&#8217;t want to risk getting a migraine.</p>
<p>As if to top it off, <i>Is This It</i> &#8212; if memory serves &#8212; lasts barely more than half an hour. This makes it an absolute fucking rip-off if you buy it at a normal album price. I expect an EP to be that long. Half an hour is roughly the length of a <em>single</em> that is released in the pretty much ubiquitous CD1 + CD2 format.</p>
<p>In short, <i>Is This It</i> lacked breath, depth and length. The personification of one-dimensional music. The prospect that The Strokes were the future of guitar-based music absolutely horrified me. So I turned my back on it all.</p>
<p>At the same time I discovered bands like Broadcast and Tortoise. I spent many evenings that year exploring the <a href="http://warprecords.com/">Warp Records</a> website, avidly listening to the audio clips of their releases. A door had been opened to an amazing world where exciting and innovative music was being made.</p>
<p>Six years on, I am still listening to exciting and innovative music released on Warp &#8212; in the shape of <a href="http://www.bttls.com/">Battles</a>.</p>
<p>For an alternative view on <i>The Guardian</i> article, <a href="http://haveringhavers.blogspot.com/2007/06/eliminate-negative.html">here is Richard Havers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/17/another-reason-to-like-battles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
