<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WMSC&#039;s decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504359</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504359</guid>
		<description>Ponzonha, I&#039;ve just installed a plugin that allows you to subscribe to comments via email by ticking the checkbox below. Is that the sort of thing you requested?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponzonha, I&#8217;ve just installed a plugin that allows you to subscribe to comments via email by ticking the checkbox below. Is that the sort of thing you requested?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The budget cap is here, now what ? &#124; F1 Wolf</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504358</link>
		<dc:creator>The budget cap is here, now what ? &#124; F1 Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504358</guid>
		<description>[...] voluntary budget cap was approved for 2010. The foundations for new double tier F1 have been laid (vee8 calls this “Formula One.1 and Formula One.2″  ). Can this work ? I don&#8217;t think too many people believe it can, and I also do not think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] voluntary budget cap was approved for 2010. The foundations for new double tier F1 have been laid (vee8 calls this “Formula One.1 and Formula One.2″  ). Can this work ? I don&#8217;t think too many people believe it can, and I also do not think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponzonha</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504357</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponzonha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504357</guid>
		<description>In the best Spanish F1 blog, things are pretty clear:
http://www.quiero-briatore-formula-1.com/ganar-o-morir/17/03/2009/
The question is whether FIA must withdraw the new point system. Sí means yes, No means No ;-)
You are welcome to drop by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the best Spanish F1 blog, things are pretty clear:<br />
<a href="http://www.quiero-briatore-formula-1.com/ganar-o-morir/17/03/2009/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.quiero-briatore-formula-1.com/ganar-o-morir/17/03/2009/'>http://www.quiero-briatore-formula-1.com/ganar-o-morir/17/03/2009/</a><br />
The question is whether FIA must withdraw the new point system. Sí means yes, No means No <img src='http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
You are welcome to drop by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Peril</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504356</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Peril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504356</guid>
		<description>And might we see more &#039;Spa-like&#039; decisions awarding wins to undeserving drivers, just to ensure they win the championship?

Apart from the driver-fan relations being improved, I think the rest of the changes are a load of hogwash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And might we see more &#8216;Spa-like&#8217; decisions awarding wins to undeserving drivers, just to ensure they win the championship?</p>
<p>Apart from the driver-fan relations being improved, I think the rest of the changes are a load of hogwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Cullen</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504355</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to say that picking the winner based on race wins has to be the worse decision. Last season Ferrari allowed both drivers to have a go at the title and only towards the end did they pick a favourite. This year the teams will need to pick early. What&#039;s the point in allowing your second driver to get any wins if this means your first loses out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to say that picking the winner based on race wins has to be the worse decision. Last season Ferrari allowed both drivers to have a go at the title and only towards the end did they pick a favourite. This year the teams will need to pick early. What&#8217;s the point in allowing your second driver to get any wins if this means your first loses out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponzonha</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504354</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponzonha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504354</guid>
		<description>Wait a minute, the champion will be the one with most wins? What a nonsense. Imagine being champion finishing winning five races and retiring the rest.
Sad, sad...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a minute, the champion will be the one with most wins? What a nonsense. Imagine being champion finishing winning five races and retiring the rest.<br />
Sad, sad&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504353</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504353</guid>
		<description>Ponzonha, I think I&#039;m with you. F1 has been driven by the FIA down a path of conservatism when it comes to technological innovation. Max and Bernie like to joke about how engineers no longer like to innovate, forgetting that it was &lt;em&gt;they&lt;/em&gt; who banned all of the innovations.

So I would prefer a budget cap of £30 million with further freedoms to the current situation where there are few freedoms but lots of money being thrown around. But it&#039;s not the budget cap &lt;i&gt;per se&lt;/i&gt; that I favour -- it&#039;s the freedom.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/73754&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fota have just released their response&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponzonha, I think I&#8217;m with you. F1 has been driven by the FIA down a path of conservatism when it comes to technological innovation. Max and Bernie like to joke about how engineers no longer like to innovate, forgetting that it was <em>they</em> who banned all of the innovations.</p>
<p>So I would prefer a budget cap of £30 million with further freedoms to the current situation where there are few freedoms but lots of money being thrown around. But it&#8217;s not the budget cap <i>per se</i> that I favour &#8212; it&#8217;s the freedom.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/73754" rel="nofollow">Fota have just released their response</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponzonha</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2009/03/17/the-wmscs-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-1504352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponzonha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vee8.doctorvee.co.uk/?p=1795#comment-1504352</guid>
		<description>I would like to comment on your last point, but I think I need to ponder calmly before speaking.
Nevertheless, I do like the &quot;freedom&quot; option. I prefer intelligence rather than sheer money, and it should open the door to small private teams with a good bunch of engineers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to comment on your last point, but I think I need to ponder calmly before speaking.<br />
Nevertheless, I do like the &#8220;freedom&#8221; option. I prefer intelligence rather than sheer money, and it should open the door to small private teams with a good bunch of engineers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

