<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In lieu of proper blogging, a&#160;meme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/#comment-475613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2236#comment-475613</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the tag Mr Vee. I'm not sure if I'll get around to it though, and not just because it'll save me admitting that the only thing I've read in the past year is the first 40 pages of The Golden Compass...!

good luck for the exams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the tag Mr Vee. I&#8217;m not sure if I&#8217;ll get around to it though, and not just because it&#8217;ll save me admitting that the only thing I&#8217;ve read in the past year is the first 40 pages of The Golden Compass&#8230;!</p>
<p>good luck for the exams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/#comment-473614</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2236#comment-473614</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;I doubt many posters at LibCon would approve much of Caplan’s proposed remedy which is more markets and less government.&lt;/i&gt;"

I dunno, there's me and Chris Dillow, although he's stopped posting of late, gone back to his more long term project of persuading Tories I suspect.  It's on my wish list, might put the priority higher and remind myself to buy it next time I've cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>I doubt many posters at LibCon would approve much of Caplan’s proposed remedy which is more markets and less government.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I dunno, there&#8217;s me and Chris Dillow, although he&#8217;s stopped posting of late, gone back to his more long term project of persuading Tories I suspect.  It&#8217;s on my wish list, might put the priority higher and remind myself to buy it next time I&#8217;ve cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/#comment-473150</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2236#comment-473150</guid>
		<description>Found the &lt;a href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2007/12/16/the-political-brain-a-practical-must-read/"&gt;link to the LibCon piece&lt;/a&gt;. Tore my hair out trying to navigate the site though -- resorted to Google in the end.

Caplan's book is great, but I doubt many posters at LibCon would approve much of Caplan's proposed remedy which is more markets and less government.

Nor is it a book that proves economists all wrong. Only a certain strand of public choice theory which says that voters should be rational is wrong. In fact, Caplan argues very convincingly that economic theory properly analysed tells us that voters are irrational.

In a nutshell, the argument is that people are rational in a market environment because it is very costly to behave irrationally. If, for instance, you believed that gold is more plentiful than tin you would find yourself out of pocket very quickly. In the polling booth you can afford to be irrational precisely because your vote makes almost no difference to the final result, so you can afford to make the wrong decision. "Rational irrationality", he calls it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found the <a href="http://www.liberalconspiracy.org/2007/12/16/the-political-brain-a-practical-must-read/">link to the LibCon piece</a>. Tore my hair out trying to navigate the site though &#8212; resorted to Google in the end.</p>
<p>Caplan&#8217;s book is great, but I doubt many posters at LibCon would approve much of Caplan&#8217;s proposed remedy which is more markets and less government.</p>
<p>Nor is it a book that proves economists all wrong. Only a certain strand of public choice theory which says that voters should be rational is wrong. In fact, Caplan argues very convincingly that economic theory properly analysed tells us that voters are irrational.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, the argument is that people are rational in a market environment because it is very costly to behave irrationally. If, for instance, you believed that gold is more plentiful than tin you would find yourself out of pocket very quickly. In the polling booth you can afford to be irrational precisely because your vote makes almost no difference to the final result, so you can afford to make the wrong decision. &#8220;Rational irrationality&#8221;, he calls it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/#comment-472932</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 11:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2236#comment-472932</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://matgb.livejournal.com/299924.html"&gt;Done&lt;/a&gt;. Y'bastard.

Been meaning to get hold of the Caplan for ages, after I read about it in a "look, these economists are all wrong" review at maybe Liberal Conspiracy (was Natalie Bennett, remember that).  Is it actually any good?  The Schuessler  looks interesting anyway, might try to dig that out from somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://matgb.livejournal.com/299924.html">Done</a>. Y&#8217;bastard.</p>
<p>Been meaning to get hold of the Caplan for ages, after I read about it in a &#8220;look, these economists are all wrong&#8221; review at maybe Liberal Conspiracy (was Natalie Bennett, remember that).  Is it actually any good?  The Schuessler  looks interesting anyway, might try to dig that out from somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angry Steve</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2008/04/27/in-lieu-of-proper-blogging-a-meme/#comment-472842</link>
		<dc:creator>Angry Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 09:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/?p=2236#comment-472842</guid>
		<description>Heh, you with The Economist too... I have a few dozen lying around that I'll probably never read, with the news and commentary just going out of date...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, you with The Economist too&#8230; I have a few dozen lying around that I&#8217;ll probably never read, with the news and commentary just going out of date&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
