<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new Scotsman.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bellgrovebelle</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-259012</link>
		<dc:creator>Bellgrovebelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-259012</guid>
		<description>Urgh. Not a fan of the new version either (although I&#039;m always irritated by the current version hiding the letters page!). Could such people not be put to better use redesigning the Sunday Herald?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Urgh. Not a fan of the new version either (although I&#8217;m always irritated by the current version hiding the letters page!). Could such people not be put to better use redesigning the Sunday Herald?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Farrer</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-258524</link>
		<dc:creator>David Farrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-258524</guid>
		<description>What a mess!

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://freedomandwhisky.blogspot.com/2007/12/scotsman.html&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a mess!</p>
<p>See <a href="http://freedomandwhisky.blogspot.com/2007/12/scotsman.html">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Havers</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-258339</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Havers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-258339</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s dire. I put a comment on their web site to that effect. Plus I cannot access the premium content, despite being a subscriber AND it doesn&#039;t work properly with Safari. Other than that it&#039;s great :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s dire. I put a comment on their web site to that effect. Plus I cannot access the premium content, despite being a subscriber AND it doesn&#8217;t work properly with Safari. Other than that it&#8217;s great <img src='http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan2</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-257506</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-257506</guid>
		<description>One thing I forgot to mention... the web team at the Scotsman responsible for the original site, I believe have now all left.  At least some of them have gone to the List</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I forgot to mention&#8230; the web team at the Scotsman responsible for the original site, I believe have now all left.  At least some of them have gone to the List</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-256754</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-256754</guid>
		<description>It looks like they&#039;re going ahead with it on the Evening News:

http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1944572007</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like they&#8217;re going ahead with it on the Evening News:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1944572007" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1944572007'>http://news.scotsman.com/edinburgh.cfm?id=1944572007</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-256669</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-256669</guid>
		<description>Duncan, well spotted. If anything, they ought to be giving the local papers the Scotsman template. It looks like an excuse to put adverts for lots of Johnston Press services all over the place now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, well spotted. If anything, they ought to be giving the local papers the Scotsman template. It looks like an excuse to put adverts for lots of Johnston Press services all over the place now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-256394</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-256394</guid>
		<description>I got sent the beta one and a survey yesterday too and those were my thoughts exactly. Apart from maybe increasing the width to fit the bigger default screen ratio there&#039;s nothing needing tampering with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got sent the beta one and a survey yesterday too and those were my thoughts exactly. Apart from maybe increasing the width to fit the bigger default screen ratio there&#8217;s nothing needing tampering with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: duncan2</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/comment-page-1/#comment-255737</link>
		<dc:creator>duncan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/12/12/the-new-scotsmancom/#comment-255737</guid>
		<description>compare the new design with that of any of the provincial papers also owned by Johnston Press. e.g.
http://www.fifetoday.co.uk/
http://www.ballymenatimes.com/
http://www.dinningtontoday.co.uk/
etc etc... all built to the same slightly amateur template.  a real step backwards for the Scotsman. 

the beta is now offline it seems, pretty short-lived beta test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>compare the new design with that of any of the provincial papers also owned by Johnston Press. e.g.<br />
<a href="http://www.fifetoday.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.fifetoday.co.uk/'>http://www.fifetoday.co.uk/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ballymenatimes.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.ballymenatimes.com/'>http://www.ballymenatimes.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dinningtontoday.co.uk/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dinningtontoday.co.uk/'>http://www.dinningtontoday.co.uk/</a><br />
etc etc&#8230; all built to the same slightly amateur template.  a real step backwards for the Scotsman. </p>
<p>the beta is now offline it seems, pretty short-lived beta test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

