Comments on: Hats off to The Daily Mail http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/ Not a real vee Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:10:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Martin Stabe » links for 2007-08-29 http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-126455 Martin Stabe » links for 2007-08-29 Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:24:16 +0000 http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/#comment-126455 [...] doctorvee: Hats off to The Daily Mail Duncan Stephen has some thoughts on newspapers web design. Likes the Mail. But: “the Sunday Herald must be one of the few MSM websites that has actually become worse over time.” (tags: daily_mail telegraph guardian sunday_herald scotsman nwespapers online design) [...] [...] doctorvee: Hats off to The Daily Mail Duncan Stephen has some thoughts on newspapers web design. Likes the Mail. But: “the Sunday Herald must be one of the few MSM websites that has actually become worse over time.” (tags: daily_mail telegraph guardian sunday_herald scotsman nwespapers online design) [...]

]]> By: jameshigham http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-126361 jameshigham Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:44:53 +0000 http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/#comment-126361 I'm with you here. They really can come up with some good stuff at times. I’m with you here. They really can come up with some good stuff at times.

]]> By: MatGB http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-126259 MatGB Wed, 29 Aug 2007 00:44:22 +0000 http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/#comment-126259 Worth observing that's for all Mail group sites, which (I think) includes the thisiswherever sites (which have been good for some time and are very carefully interlinked) and also (definitely, same IP) the Metro. And of course the Metro site includes Metro Weird. Which is subscribed to by half of my sources of strange stories--the rest haven't noticed yet. It's not the Mail site that's good (although it is, you're right), it's the large group of sites working together. Worth observing that’s for all Mail group sites, which (I think) includes the thisiswherever sites (which have been good for some time and are very carefully interlinked) and also (definitely, same IP) the Metro.

And of course the Metro site includes Metro Weird. Which is subscribed to by half of my sources of strange stories–the rest haven’t noticed yet.

It’s not the Mail site that’s good (although it is, you’re right), it’s the large group of sites working together.

]]> By: Calum Leslie http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/comment-page-1/#comment-126048 Calum Leslie Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:38:04 +0000 http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/08/28/hats-off-to-the-daily-mail/#comment-126048 I'm not so pleased with the Daily Mail website. The navigation is split, confusing and not well-related, and its layout spacing makes things flow together a bit too much, making it quite difficult to distinguish areas to read. On top of that it's just a bit too busy as well. It's better than "classic" press sites, though (with the exception of the BBC's constantly-impressive news site) Princess Di *and* Madeline McCann on the frontpage though. CONTENT DELIVERS. I’m not so pleased with the Daily Mail website. The navigation is split, confusing and not well-related, and its layout spacing makes things flow together a bit too much, making it quite difficult to distinguish areas to read. On top of that it’s just a bit too busy as well.

It’s better than “classic” press sites, though (with the exception of the BBC’s constantly-impressive news site)

Princess Di *and* Madeline McCann on the frontpage though. CONTENT DELIVERS.

]]>