<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not THAT bad! Is it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee &#187; In defence of the London 2012 logo (again)</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-92037</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee &#187; In defence of the London 2012 logo (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-92037</guid>
		<description>[...] is another post about the new London 2012 logo. I have to admit it; I am actually becoming more fond of the logo. This now reminds me quite a lot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is another post about the new London 2012 logo. I have to admit it; I am actually becoming more fond of the logo. This now reminds me quite a lot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-92014</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-92014</guid>
		<description>Doh! Now I have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/2007/06/04/why-the-2012-olympics-logo-is-shit/&quot;&gt;read at qwghlm&lt;/a&gt; that the logo also looks like a man vomiting. Which it does. The logo&#039;s biggest crime is the fact that it has ended up looking like so many unfortunate things.

Maybe they should change it from
20
12
to 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh! Now I have <a href="http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/blog/2007/06/04/why-the-2012-olympics-logo-is-shit/">read at qwghlm</a> that the logo also looks like a man vomiting. Which it does. The logo&#8217;s biggest crime is the fact that it has ended up looking like so many unfortunate things.</p>
<p>Maybe they should change it from<br />
20<br />
12<br />
to 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-92010</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-92010</guid>
		<description>You mean &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.the-spine.com/images/london_logo.jpg&quot;&gt;like this&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean <a href="http://www.the-spine.com/images/london_logo.jpg">like this</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calum Leslie</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-91993</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-91993</guid>
		<description>Someone pointed out on the BBC site that it looks like &quot;someone being taken roughly from behind&quot;, and I&#039;ve not been able to look at it since then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone pointed out on the BBC site that it looks like &#8220;someone being taken roughly from behind&#8221;, and I&#8217;ve not been able to look at it since then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craigblog.co.uk &#187; London 2012 Olympics - The Unveiling of the Logo...</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-91991</link>
		<dc:creator>craigblog.co.uk &#187; London 2012 Olympics - The Unveiling of the Logo...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 22:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-91991</guid>
		<description>[...] thing, even having readers suggest new logos and there are various blogs which are commenting both for and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thing, even having readers suggest new logos and there are various blogs which are commenting both for and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-91961</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-91961</guid>
		<description>You know, I never realised that ribbon thing was meant to look like the River Thames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I never realised that ribbon thing was meant to look like the River Thames.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-91960</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/06/04/its-not-that-bad-is-it/#comment-91960</guid>
		<description>I think - beyond the basic problems that it&#039;s just eye-meltingly horrible and that Coe&#039;s &quot;this is the vision at the very heart of our brand&quot; was nauseating marketing-drivel - a big part of the problem was that the original candidate city logo was actually very cool. 

The stylised River Thames sweeping through the city&#039;s name, the simple but appealing font, the understated nature of the whole thing made it a classy piece of work, that actually did represent London (as much as a simple bit of graphic art can represent an entire city). In comparison to that, the thought of having this plastered everywhere for the next five years is simply horrifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8211; beyond the basic problems that it&#8217;s just eye-meltingly horrible and that Coe&#8217;s &#8220;this is the vision at the very heart of our brand&#8221; was nauseating marketing-drivel &#8211; a big part of the problem was that the original candidate city logo was actually very cool. </p>
<p>The stylised River Thames sweeping through the city&#8217;s name, the simple but appealing font, the understated nature of the whole thing made it a classy piece of work, that actually did represent London (as much as a simple bit of graphic art can represent an entire city). In comparison to that, the thought of having this plastered everywhere for the next five years is simply horrifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

