The Scotsman explains “Why 47+16+2 > 65 could be Salmond’s favourite sum”. Shouldn’t that be 47 + 16 + 2 = 65? (You don’t need to be an economist to work this out.)
-
Follow me. I have two Twitter accounts.
-
About
I am Duncan Stephen, based in Dundee but originally from Fife. I work as the Web Editor for the University of St Andrews. This is a personal blog.
My interests include motorsport and experimental / electronic music.
-
Recent articles
-
Editor's picks
-
Subscribe
akatsuki
5 May 2007 01:37
#1
Since we’re being pedantic, the copy editor should have spotted this one:
“But, as Mr Salmond admitted last night, the process of forging a coalition between three parties – two of who[m] have fundamental disagreements over a central policy issue – will take time.”
doctorvee
5 May 2007 01:39
#2
Oh well… Maybe it’s just the sllep derpivation getting to them.
CalumCarr
5 May 2007 09:11
#3
My blog is alive. Only needed my head to be reattached. Thanks for your support.
God. you folk who can just give up on the likes of Blogger and do your own thing! beyond me how you do it!
doctorvee
5 May 2007 14:16
#4
Heh… Good to hear you’ll be back blogging.