Blog » Post

« All right, which one of you bastards stopped linking to me?

Who’s the realest? »

Lewis Hamilton: The next Jacques Villeneuve?

17 April 2007 11:07. Updated: 13 June 2007 22:39

Well that’s blown it. The most exciting new talent to hit Formula 1 in a long time is about to find himself in the centre of the dreaded British tabloid hype. Jenson Button wilted under the spotlight. Lewis Hamilton might not cope much better, despite the nerves of steel he has shown in his career so far.

A few people are worried that he will catch the “Formula 1 disease” and lose his racing edge, opting for a safe 8 or 6 points instead of taking the sort of risky moves we have seen from him. More worryingly, Hamilton will have to take the chequered flag soon, otherwise the media will make him pay the price. The fact that Button took so long to win a race suffocated the man. Expectations were too high. The higher the expectations, the bigger the pressure and the worse the performance.

And as Clive James has pointed out, it could be even worse for Lewis Hamilton because he is black. So not only is he a sportsman who is expected to win. He is also expected to be a representative of an entire race.

But Hamilton, as a rookie, has had it relatively easy so far. His first three races happened in relative anonymity as far as the general public was concerned. Now, it seems, everybody knows about him. He has made history, being the first ever driver to finish on the podium in each of his first three races.

Yesterday morning Jackie Stewart moved the hype machine up a gear by saying that he could be the World Champion this year. He would be the first rookie to do so, apart from the very first World Champion back in 1950 (because they were all rookies).

In one sense, Jackie Stewart is absolutely right. What he said is really no more than a statement of fact. Lewis Hamilton could win the World Championship this year. I said so myself yesterday. But there is a difference between me and Jackie Stewart.

I am an arsehole with a blog. I have never raced a car in my life. The ultimate armchair enthuso-dick. Stewart, on the other hand, is one of the most respected observers of Formula 1 in the world, a triple World Champion who has seen decades of racing and knows what he is talking about.

As such, Jackie Stewart’s word is taken as gospel. And because he has said that Hamilton could win the championship this year (a statement of fact), people will now start to expect him to actually win the championship this year (a fanciful tabloid seller).

Jackie Stewart’s appearance on Today was just the first step, and by the end of the morning Matt Bishop, editor-in-chief of F1 Racing, was on Radio Five Live spouting the biggest load of crap I have ever heard about a driver who has only driven three grands prix.

F1 Racing is a good magazine, but it likes its hype and sensationalism. It’s a bit like the NME of motor racing publications. “Why Nico Rosberg will be world champion!” and “Robert Kubica is the best rookie since Alonso!” are two typical headlines you might see in F1 Racing. They said similar sorts of things about Fisichella and Trulli a decade ago.

This is made worse by the fact that Hamilton happens to be British, so everyone in the country will be interested. I can see the next cover in my head. “HAMILTON! The best driver the world has ever seen! And why he will be the first ever rookie champ!”

I can understand this sort of thing when it is designed to sell magazines. But Matt Bishop was there on Radio Five Live representing Formula 1. He is meant to be a level-headed expert. So what did he say?

He said that Hamilton has trounced his team-mate Alonso. Well, he beat Alonso in the last race, but was it a trouncing? It looked to me as though Alonso was just struggling on the soft tyres. He had a bad race in Bahrain. But in the other two races, Alonso beat Hamilton. At best, I would say Hamilton and Alonso look neck-and-neck.

But what Mr Bishop went on to say after that was even worse, almost unimaginable. He said that Hamilton is one of five or six drivers in Formula 1 history who have ever had this much talent. And then a minute later he even trotted out the names of people who Hamilton is meant to be as good as.

Lewis Hamilton is in the same chapter only as Juan Manuel Fangio, Jim Clark, Ayrton Senna, Michael Schumacher. And that’s it.

So, with a career that has lasted just three races, Lewis Hamilton is, according to Matt Bishop, at least the fifth-best driver the world has ever seen; the latest in a short list of Formula 1’s most legendary names. That is just an extraordinary thing to say. He hasn’t even won a race yet. Hamilton has looked impressive, but give him a chance! This is just going to create expectations that simply will not be met any time soon.

And, predictably, it just gets worse with ITV’s coverage. ITV have spent the past few years creaming their pants over the distinctly average Jenson Button. Now that a genuinely good British driver has arrived it is just one big Lewis Hamilton wank-fest.

As if the interviews with his brother (eh? What other sports give you interviews with a sportsperson’s brother?) weren’t bad enough, ITV even manage to spend their whole time talking about Lewis Hamilton even when they are interviewing other drivers.

Before the race at the weekend there was an interview with Robert Kubica where Louise Goodman actually said to him something along the lines of, “But you’re making the sort of mistakes that Lewis Hamilton should be making as a rookie — what do you think of him?”

And then after the race there was an interview with Alonso where the questions about Alonso’s race came across as a chore for Louise Goodman, who obviously couldn’t wait to say, “But Lewis Hamilton had a good race, didn’t he?” Alonso frowned and politely said “yes”, but if I was in his shoes I might have given her a punch.

And the British public will tune into the Spanish Grand Prix next month expecting to see something amazing. And Hamilton will now know what is expected. And he will be unable to deliver it.

Let us just remember the last time a rookie driver had such an impressive start to a career. Jacques Villeneuve came damn close to winning his first race in 1996. He came close to winning that championship. He went on to win the Championship in 1997. But after that, his career was so shoddy that it became just one big embarrassment to the entire concept of the 1997 World Drivers’ Championship.

Something tells me that the next issue of F1 Racing won’t have the headline, “LEWIS HAMILTON: The next Jacques Villeneuve!”

Rate: 4 (Votes: 4)
Loading ... Loading ...

14 Comments »

Comments RSS feed
Trackback URL

  1. #1 Sarah Gravatar
    17 April 2007 11:41

    The Allen/Brundle/Ryder loveathon means that I call him King Hamilton. Or Hamilton [insert kissy kissy noise here]. And then I get dirty looks for talking over the commentary and have to leave the room.

  2. #2 Danny Gravatar
    18 April 2007 01:49

    I posted a similar thing in response to friend’s comment. Matt Bishop’s comments were incredibly unhelpful and he no doubt knew what he was doing. His decision was probably calculated to get him and the sport the maximum attention.

    If Hamilton does well, they can pat themselves on the back for spotting the next star. If he does badly, it’s his/the team’s/the pressure’s fault. The critics are never wrongTM.

  3. #3 TOM THUMB Gravatar
    11 June 2007 23:37

    IT IS PURE IGNORANCE THAT PEOPLE OVER LOOK THE FACT THAT HIS MOTHER IS WHITE AND THIS IS WHY HE CAN DO WHAT BLACK MEN CAN’T DO BECAUSE HE HAS WHITE BLOOD IN HIM. IT’S THE SAME WITH TIGER WOODS HE TOO HAS WHITE BLOOD. WHAT ABOUT BARACK OBAMA HE TOO HAS WHITE BLOOD WHITE MOTHER. ALL THIS TALK OF GREAT BLACK MEN IS REALLY FUNNY WHEN NON OF THE MEN ABOVE ARE REALLY BLACK ..LOL!

    FACE IT! DON’T FAKE IT!

  4. #4 doctorvee Gravatar
    12 June 2007 21:22

    I definitely think that all-caps is the online equivalent of green ink.

  5. #5 joe coker Gravatar
    19 June 2007 16:49

    Tiger woods has white blood!!?? Get your facts right! Fool!!

  6. #6 John Hickman Gravatar
    8 September 2007 16:30

    Is Hamilton talented? Obviously, but due to the possibility of McLaren benefiting from Ferrari data on how to get the Bridgestones to work only Alonso knows how good. To compare him with Fangio and Clark is a slur on their characters and skill.
    Does Hamilton respect others? Obviously not - his behaviour is akin to an eight year old having a tantrum in the school playground. Just look how he responded to Ron Dennis’s request that he allow Alonso to pass (and this was the man who subsidised Hamilton’s racing for years) and the FIA request that McLaren drivers be honest at the forthcoming meeting.
    So talent yes, but a genuine guy – hardly.

  7. #7 Lawrence Gravatar
    1 October 2007 10:09

    “Lewis Hamilton is in the same chapter only as Juan Manuel Fangio, Jim Clark, Ayrton Senna, Michael Schumacher. And that’s it.”

    In the light of Hamilton’s Fuji Victory, in what way is the above statement inaccurate?

  8. #8 doctorvee Gravatar
    1 October 2007 17:41

    Juan Manuel Fangio

    Years in F1: 8
    World Championships: 5
    Races competed: 52
    Race wins: 24

    Jim Clark

    Years in F1: 9
    World Championships 2:
    Races competed: 73
    Race wins: 25

    Ayrton Senna

    Years in F1: 11
    World Championships: 3
    Races competed: 162
    Race wins: 41

    Michael Schumacher

    Years in F1: 16
    World Championships: 7
    Races competed: 250
    Races wins: 91

    Lewis Hamilton

    Years in F1: 1
    World Championships: 0
    Races competed: 15
    Wins: 4

    It is obvious in what way the statement is inaccurate. Juan Manuel Fangio, Jim Clark, Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher all had careers. They had high times and low times and had to struggle during difficult moments. Meanwhile, Lewis Hamilton has not even completed one season and has had the odds stacked in his favour from the beginning.

    If Lewis Hamilton can keep this up for five, six, seven years. Then yes, maybe the statement will be accurate. But when the statement was made — when Hamilton was a paltry three races into his career — it was (and still is) an utter lie.

  9. #9 Mozira Gravatar
    3 October 2007 11:05

    Well where do i start this guy is causing a lot of commotion, firstly answer Tom Thumb, the child takes the side of the father and secondly i think tiger woods’s mother is Asian, moving on even here in South Africa you have analysts saying he is the best thing that has hit Formula One after a long stance by Michael Schumacer. Personally I think he is excellent because if you look closely nothing seems from the media seems to disrupt him on his mission to become the World Champion in his first year of F1 but rating him to otrher Previous Champions is not appropriate because they had their way of driving and have written their path in Formula One, let Lewis Hamilton wite his own history in his own time and in his own way. Lastly check mobivids.co.za on your mobile phones people and judge me thank you
    ____________________________

    This is the way!!!

  10. #10 Hamilton Interview Gravatar
    25 November 2007 19:43

    Obviously Lewis Hamilton is not the next Jacques Villeneuve! He’s done so much better and more consistently - they’re not even really comparable. They were also racing in different generations of Formula 1 - so it’s always pretty impossible to compare as there are totally circumstances.

Leave a comment

Name and email required, email never displayed, some HTML allowed.
If you are posting your first comment, I will have to approve it before it is displayed.