<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader deleting unread posts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gs</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-951104</link>
		<dc:creator>gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/#comment-951104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed the same thing and it&#039;s driving me crazy. What sort of use-case assumption is it to mark a post as read after it&#039;s a month old? If I have kept a post as unread then I want it to stay unread unless I change it myself. 

What a ridiculous assumption made by the software engineers. I&#039;m actually planning to use another reader now as this is unacceptable. 

And not to mention all the ads Google has started inserting!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed the same thing and it&#8217;s driving me crazy. What sort of use-case assumption is it to mark a post as read after it&#8217;s a month old? If I have kept a post as unread then I want it to stay unread unless I change it myself. </p>
<p>What a ridiculous assumption made by the software engineers. I&#8217;m actually planning to use another reader now as this is unacceptable. </p>
<p>And not to mention all the ads Google has started inserting!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mihai Parparita</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-45922</link>
		<dc:creator>Mihai Parparita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2007/01/05/google-reader-deleting-unread-posts/#comment-45922</guid>
		<description>Reader doesn&#039;t actually delete old unread posts, it just marks them as read. If you show all items for a feed or a folder, you can scroll back to see even these old items.

Mihai Parparita
Google Reader Engineer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reader doesn&#8217;t actually delete old unread posts, it just marks them as read. If you show all items for a feed or a folder, you can scroll back to see even these old items.</p>
<p>Mihai Parparita<br />
Google Reader Engineer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

