<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m converted!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatGB</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/comment-page-1/#comment-21453</link>
		<dc:creator>MatGB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/#comment-21453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been trying it last few days, and am finding it very good, except...

It&#039;s really dial up unfriendly.  At work, it&#039;s great, but I really don&#039;t want to be spending much time at work looking at feeds, so my friends page is better.  But at home, it&#039;d be wonderful, except it&#039;s so slow to do anything.

But, it does seem to have everything I actually want from a feedreader, including folders and sorting chronologically.  If they can make it easier to assign feeds to folders, especially on subscription, I&#039;d be completely sold, despite the load lag.

As it is, I think a combination of this and LJ will work well.  Given it also allows you to make folders public, and releases a feed, it works as a mini aggregator as well, which is even better.  Could easily integrate some content intoa  few sites at some point.  That&#039;d be good.

Thx for the mention; doubt I&#039;d have re-tried it otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been trying it last few days, and am finding it very good, except&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really dial up unfriendly.  At work, it&#8217;s great, but I really don&#8217;t want to be spending much time at work looking at feeds, so my friends page is better.  But at home, it&#8217;d be wonderful, except it&#8217;s so slow to do anything.</p>
<p>But, it does seem to have everything I actually want from a feedreader, including folders and sorting chronologically.  If they can make it easier to assign feeds to folders, especially on subscription, I&#8217;d be completely sold, despite the load lag.</p>
<p>As it is, I think a combination of this and LJ will work well.  Given it also allows you to make folders public, and releases a feed, it works as a mini aggregator as well, which is even better.  Could easily integrate some content intoa  few sites at some point.  That&#8217;d be good.</p>
<p>Thx for the mention; doubt I&#8217;d have re-tried it otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Reader Roundup &#187; Another Blogger</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/comment-page-1/#comment-21059</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reader Roundup &#187; Another Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/10/12/im-converted/#comment-21059</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doctorvee loves many things including stars, reverse-chronological sorting, and the smooth OPML import.Ã‚Â  He has a few complaints too, go check them out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

