<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/comment-page-1/#comment-18092</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/#comment-18092</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone.

Yeah, I saw that clip on the official DVD! At first I thought he was just playing a drunkard or something, but he&#039;s much better at playing somebody who walks in a really camp manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone.</p>
<p>Yeah, I saw that clip on the official DVD! At first I thought he was just playing a drunkard or something, but he&#8217;s much better at playing somebody who walks in a really camp manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Longrider</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/comment-page-1/#comment-18071</link>
		<dc:creator>Longrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 06:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/#comment-18071</guid>
		<description>The hazard perception test is one of the more ridiculous attempts by the DSA to get &quot;hip&quot; and up with the new technology. The clips are poor quality and don&#039;t test the candidate&#039;s perception skills one jot.

As I&#039;m retaking my ADI qualifications (having allowed my license to lapse some 15 years ago), I had to take this silly test. As it is designed to test learner drivers, it disadvantages experienced drivers who spot the &quot;hazards&quot; well before the scoring window. Consequently, they tend to score low. I managed to blow one complete clip. In this case, the clip showed the car on a  dual carriageway approaching a junction. Now, come on, it&#039;s blindingly obvious what the &quot;hazard&quot; will be - a car emerging from the left. Yup, sure enough, that&#039;s what it was. As there was a truck overtaking on the right at the same time, I clicked for that, too. The computer said &quot;no&quot; as I&#039;d clicked too many times.

I still passed the test overall, and still have a very low opinion of the test. Hazard perception will only be carried out effectively out on the road with real hazards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hazard perception test is one of the more ridiculous attempts by the DSA to get &#8220;hip&#8221; and up with the new technology. The clips are poor quality and don&#8217;t test the candidate&#8217;s perception skills one jot.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m retaking my ADI qualifications (having allowed my license to lapse some 15 years ago), I had to take this silly test. As it is designed to test learner drivers, it disadvantages experienced drivers who spot the &#8220;hazards&#8221; well before the scoring window. Consequently, they tend to score low. I managed to blow one complete clip. In this case, the clip showed the car on a  dual carriageway approaching a junction. Now, come on, it&#8217;s blindingly obvious what the &#8220;hazard&#8221; will be &#8211; a car emerging from the left. Yup, sure enough, that&#8217;s what it was. As there was a truck overtaking on the right at the same time, I clicked for that, too. The computer said &#8220;no&#8221; as I&#8217;d clicked too many times.</p>
<p>I still passed the test overall, and still have a very low opinion of the test. Hazard perception will only be carried out effectively out on the road with real hazards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collie</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/comment-page-1/#comment-18053</link>
		<dc:creator>Collie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/#comment-18053</guid>
		<description>Did you ever see the official Hazard Perception Test DVD before you took your test?  It gives sample videos of what to expect.  The second clip I believe is a country road where a man is walking by the side of the road.  Now you mention the acting - well this particular chap plays it up to the cameras all right, because as soon as the camera/car gets up close to him, he immediately starts walking in the most camp fashion ever.  When you notice it, it&#039;s ridiculous! 

I actually think the Hazard part of the test is a good idea though.  Yes you know there will be a hazard in the clip, but you don&#039;t know if the scoreable hazard will occur 5 seconds into the clip, or 1 minute 30.  You are made to continuously scout the surroundings for the kind of things its easy to forget about or miss when you are actually driving.  In addition, it tests your response time to hazards that unfold.  I remember when I took my theory test, on the way to the test centre I took the bus in.  Sitting on the top deck, I spent much of the journey looking out for the hazards.  Up until that point I&#039;d been much more casual about such things but now I was much more focused and aware,  and when I took the actual driving part, I was much more confident.

Congrats on passing though.  It really is a piece of piss isn&#039;t it.  I assume the only people who struggle with the theory tests are the same types who watch shows like ITV&#039;s The Mint and actually believe they&#039;re going to guess the number and win Â£10,000 or whatever.  Bunch of idiots the lot of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever see the official Hazard Perception Test DVD before you took your test?  It gives sample videos of what to expect.  The second clip I believe is a country road where a man is walking by the side of the road.  Now you mention the acting &#8211; well this particular chap plays it up to the cameras all right, because as soon as the camera/car gets up close to him, he immediately starts walking in the most camp fashion ever.  When you notice it, it&#8217;s ridiculous! </p>
<p>I actually think the Hazard part of the test is a good idea though.  Yes you know there will be a hazard in the clip, but you don&#8217;t know if the scoreable hazard will occur 5 seconds into the clip, or 1 minute 30.  You are made to continuously scout the surroundings for the kind of things its easy to forget about or miss when you are actually driving.  In addition, it tests your response time to hazards that unfold.  I remember when I took my theory test, on the way to the test centre I took the bus in.  Sitting on the top deck, I spent much of the journey looking out for the hazards.  Up until that point I&#8217;d been much more casual about such things but now I was much more focused and aware,  and when I took the actual driving part, I was much more confident.</p>
<p>Congrats on passing though.  It really is a piece of piss isn&#8217;t it.  I assume the only people who struggle with the theory tests are the same types who watch shows like ITV&#8217;s The Mint and actually believe they&#8217;re going to guess the number and win Â£10,000 or whatever.  Bunch of idiots the lot of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/comment-page-1/#comment-18043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/#comment-18043</guid>
		<description>Yeah, congrats man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, congrats man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/comment-page-1/#comment-18016</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/09/14/passage/#comment-18016</guid>
		<description>Well done!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

