<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Wipe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 06:47:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/comment-page-1/#comment-16009</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 17:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/#comment-16009</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I had always assumed that they deliberately scheduled those programmes next to each other for that reason. Time Trumpet finishes very close to 10:30 for my liking -- I was a bit worried that I was missing the start of Screen Wipe. But Screen Wipe (usually) starts a bit after 10:30. I thought that was intentional, so that people flicking over from BBC Two wouldn&#039;t miss it.

I heard a few years ago that the BBC was considering employing people whose job it was to make sure that clashes like this didn&#039;t take place. I assume they decided against it in the end. No doubt it would be criticised for being too typically bureaucratic-Beeb, but if it could avoid howlers like the Time Trumpet / Screen Wipe clash it surely would be a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I had always assumed that they deliberately scheduled those programmes next to each other for that reason. Time Trumpet finishes very close to 10:30 for my liking &#8212; I was a bit worried that I was missing the start of Screen Wipe. But Screen Wipe (usually) starts a bit after 10:30. I thought that was intentional, so that people flicking over from BBC Two wouldn&#8217;t miss it.</p>
<p>I heard a few years ago that the BBC was considering employing people whose job it was to make sure that clashes like this didn&#8217;t take place. I assume they decided against it in the end. No doubt it would be criticised for being too typically bureaucratic-Beeb, but if it could avoid howlers like the Time Trumpet / Screen Wipe clash it surely would be a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prolix</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/comment-page-1/#comment-16004</link>
		<dc:creator>Prolix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/#comment-16004</guid>
		<description>I spotted this in the TV guide (paper version, I don&#039;t get on with DigiGuide) on Saturday, it does seem somewhat harebrained. As you suggest, and as both our situations highlight - the audience of Time Trumpet is highly likely to be the same audience that watch Screenwipe. I&#039;ll be joining you in watching the repeat then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spotted this in the TV guide (paper version, I don&#8217;t get on with DigiGuide) on Saturday, it does seem somewhat harebrained. As you suggest, and as both our situations highlight &#8211; the audience of Time Trumpet is highly likely to be the same audience that watch Screenwipe. I&#8217;ll be joining you in watching the repeat then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/comment-page-1/#comment-16003</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/#comment-16003</guid>
		<description>I think it was to do with coComment (which I&#039;ve started using again). The &#039;Submit&#039; button simply wasn&#039;t working. I should have just turned coComment off for that page; that would have been the clever thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it was to do with coComment (which I&#8217;ve started using again). The &#8216;Submit&#8217; button simply wasn&#8217;t working. I should have just turned coComment off for that page; that would have been the clever thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/comment-page-1/#comment-16002</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 15:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doctorvee.co.uk/2006/08/14/time-wipe/#comment-16002</guid>
		<description>Were you getting blocked for spam, or something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you getting blocked for spam, or something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

