<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Talk: why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/</link>
	<description>Not a real vee</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Up Your Ego</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7804</link>
		<dc:creator>Up Your Ego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7804</guid>
		<description>If it's just other Google Talk users then it just strikes me as a pointless marketing excersize - I mean creating a messenger client based on an existing protocol isn't exactly taxing for a major company like Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s just other Google Talk users then it just strikes me as a pointless marketing excersize - I mean creating a messenger client based on an existing protocol isn&#8217;t exactly taxing for a major company like Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7803</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7803</guid>
		<description>It's just other Google Talk user. Hardly revolutionary if you ask me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just other Google Talk user. Hardly revolutionary if you ask me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Up Your Ego</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7802</link>
		<dc:creator>Up Your Ego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7802</guid>
		<description>I read in a news story, I think in the Register that Google WILL be implementing the ability to connect to all the other services - if that does happen then it really is a strong news story - a big, well known brand launching a messenger client that can connect to any other network.

If they implement webcams, smillies and avaters I will use it all the time I expect but right now can't be arsed to download it.

As for the phone feature - will you be able to call normal landlines or just other google talk users?

If you can call landlines then I might invest in a wifi phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read in a news story, I think in the Register that Google WILL be implementing the ability to connect to all the other services - if that does happen then it really is a strong news story - a big, well known brand launching a messenger client that can connect to any other network.</p>
<p>If they implement webcams, smillies and avaters I will use it all the time I expect but right now can&#8217;t be arsed to download it.</p>
<p>As for the phone feature - will you be able to call normal landlines or just other google talk users?</p>
<p>If you can call landlines then I might invest in a wifi phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VoIP Blog - VoIP News, Gadgets</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7798</link>
		<dc:creator>VoIP Blog - VoIP News, Gadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 21:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7798</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Talk Just a "Me too" product - for now&lt;/strong&gt;

In yesterday's blog post, I wrote about Google Talk's impending launch today. I tried to test Google Talk as quickly as I could and blog my testing experiences here. Further, yesterday I pondered, &#34;...the ability for Google Talk to do...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Talk Just a &#8220;Me too&#8221; product - for now</strong></p>
<p>In yesterday&#8217;s blog post, I wrote about Google Talk&#8217;s impending launch today. I tried to test Google Talk as quickly as I could and blog my testing experiences here. Further, yesterday I pondered, &quot;&#8230;the ability for Google Talk to do&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctorvee</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7797</link>
		<dc:creator>doctorvee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7797</guid>
		<description>I saw the report on the Six O'Clock News. I think the 'news' here is that Google has scratched its arse. Next week they'll start something like a photo sharing site, and they'll get free publicity on every news bulletin in the western world without having done anything notable. A good day's work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the report on the Six O&#8217;Clock News. I think the &#8216;news&#8217; here is that Google has scratched its arse. Next week they&#8217;ll start something like a photo sharing site, and they&#8217;ll get free publicity on every news bulletin in the western world without having done anything notable. A good day&#8217;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchy</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7795</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7795</guid>
		<description>Well this sums up my thoughts about Google Talk. But i see it in a different way, if google can give Jabber a kick up the arse to implement web-cams then this could be big. Jabber is already capable of connecting to the other IM services in one client (also one connection as although you still have to sign up for each   network, then link it to your jabber server account, you only connect via the jabber server rather then MSN, AIM and Yahoo all at the same time). What we really need is interoperability, and if google let you use MSN, AIM and Yahoo accounts with Google talk (is possible) then it will be a big wake up call to the big 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this sums up my thoughts about Google Talk. But i see it in a different way, if google can give Jabber a kick up the arse to implement web-cams then this could be big. Jabber is already capable of connecting to the other IM services in one client (also one connection as although you still have to sign up for each   network, then link it to your jabber server account, you only connect via the jabber server rather then MSN, AIM and Yahoo all at the same time). What we really need is interoperability, and if google let you use MSN, AIM and Yahoo accounts with Google talk (is possible) then it will be a big wake up call to the big 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7794</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7794</guid>
		<description>The BBC's 6 O'Clock News went for a similar angle as C4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC&#8217;s 6 O&#8217;Clock News went for a similar angle as C4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7793</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7793</guid>
		<description>If you want to know why, then the rather long piece on Channel 4 News just now, explaining how you can use Google Talk as an internet phone service is probably why. While VOIP and IM might be old hat to us bloggers, it's the latest bright new shiny thing for the majority of the population, and now lovely wonderful Google have brought it to them.

Google Earth is a mission statement, not a product :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to know why, then the rather long piece on Channel 4 News just now, explaining how you can use Google Talk as an internet phone service is probably why. While VOIP and IM might be old hat to us bloggers, it&#8217;s the latest bright new shiny thing for the majority of the population, and now lovely wonderful Google have brought it to them.</p>
<p>Google Earth is a mission statement, not a product <img src='http://doctorvee.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Eady's Brainlock</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7792</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Eady's Brainlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7792</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google breaking its philosophy?&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;ve been wondering when Google would start to break it&#8217;s lofty philosphies stated on it&#8217;s corporate website.  While it is noble to forsake the expansion of your business and the pursuit of higher profits, publicly owned companies ha...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google breaking its philosophy?</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve been wondering when Google would start to break it&#8217;s lofty philosphies stated on it&#8217;s corporate website.  While it is noble to forsake the expansion of your business and the pursuit of higher profits, publicly owned companies ha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lambic</title>
		<link>http://doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7790</link>
		<dc:creator>lambic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doctorvee.co.uk/2005/08/24/google-talk-why/#comment-7790</guid>
		<description>It is going to be a struggle to fight against the likes of AIM and MSN, but I'm happy that Google are using open source software (Google Talk is based on the Jabber IM protocol). Jabber has been around for a long time, but it has needed something like this to give it a kickstart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is going to be a struggle to fight against the likes of AIM and MSN, but I&#8217;m happy that Google are using open source software (Google Talk is based on the Jabber IM protocol). Jabber has been around for a long time, but it has needed something like this to give it a kickstart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
